http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Colon
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	colon
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf partOfSpeech (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1439
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Sign with two vertical points that is used in writing and printing to introduce an explanation, example or quotation. (Gil Francopoulo; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1439)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SentenceMedialPunctuation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#StrongInflection
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In German (and other Germanic languages), when gender, number and case are not expressed by a determiner, the adjective takes the endings of the strong inflection. (http://www.canoo.net/services/OnlineGrammar/Wort/Adjektiv/Deklinationstyp/Stark.html 20.11.06) Strong inflection is a characteristic of lexemes, not individual tokens.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#InflectionTypeFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SublativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Sublative; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1392
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	SublativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location under which another referent is moving toward. It has the meaning 'towards the underneath of'. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Sublative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adverbial
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Bies et al. 1995
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	-ADV (adverbial) — marks a constituent other than ADVP or PP when it is used adverbially (e.g., NPs or free (“headless”) relatives). However, constituents that themselves are modifying an ADVP generally do not get -ADV. (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SyntacticFunction
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DeponentMiddle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/DeponentMiddle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Action denotes physical/mental disposition of subject. (Siewierska 1988:257) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/DeponentMiddle)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MiddleVoice
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CessativeAspect
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	cessative
	accomplished
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2001
	subClassOf aspect (dcif:conceptualDomain)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Aspect that expresses the cessation of an event or state. (SIL; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2001)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#AspectFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CloseBracket
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	close bracket
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2083
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Punctuation that is graphically represented by ] (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2083)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RightParentheticalPunctuation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubordinatorField
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In the German clause, the PARORD-field is the field for non-coordinating particles which optionally occur as the left-most element of a verb-second clause (Telljohann et al. 2009, p.17)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#TopologicalField
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ReducedRelativeClause
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Santorini 1991
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	RRC (reduced relative clause) Reduced relative clauses are adjoined to the NP they modify. (Bies et al. 1995) We will use the term \reduced relative clause" to refer to participial or adjectival constituents of the type illustrated in (@26). (26) He bought two watches designed by Paloma Picasso. Reduced relative clauses should be bracketed as adjunction structures. The structure of ( 26) is thus as in (@27). Note that the reduced relative clause, which is headed by a participle, is bracketed as a VP. (27) (S (NP He) (VP bought (NP (NP two watches) (VP designed (PP by (PNP (PNP Paloma) (PNP Picasso)))))) .) (Santorini 1991)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubordinateClause
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Reflexive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TODO: integrate with Voice, rename to ReflexiveVoice
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A reflexive verb is a verb whose semantic agent and patient (typically represented syntactically by the subject and the direct object) are the same. In many languages, reflexive constructions are rendered by transitive verbs followed by a reflexive pronoun, as in English -self (e. g., She threw herself to the floor.). (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reflexive_verbs 20.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ReflexivityFeature
	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#VoiceFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Supine
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES NonFiniteVerb with VerbForm="Supine".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Supine is a nonfinite form of motion verbs with functions similar to that of an infinitive (Angelika Adams)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Converb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NonReflexive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TODO: remove
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A non-reflexive verb is a verb whose semantic agent and patient (typically represented syntactically by the subject and the direct object) are not the same. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reflexive_verbs 20.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ReflexivityFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AbbreviatedPronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#Pronominal
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Abbreviation/Syntactic_Type="pronominal" (Romanian), e.g., d-ta/dumneata, d-tale/dumitale, d-voastră/dumneavoastră, dv./dumneavoastră, dvs./dumneavoastră (http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#Pronominal)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Abbreviation
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Pronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Superlative
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES, http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1422
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The superlative of an adjective or adverb is a form of adjective or adverb which indicates that something has some feature to a greater degree than anything it is being compared to in a given context. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superlative 17.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#DegreeFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CliticDefiniteArticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	clitic definite article
	clitic definite determiner
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	cf. http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#CliticDistalDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	clitic definite determiner, e.g., in Macedonian, Bulgarian, and Romanian (http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#CliticDeterminerType)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DefiniteArticle
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CliticElement
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Strong
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TODO: rename to StrongPronoun
	EAGLES
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Strong pronouns are different from the weak pronouns (cf. StrengthFeature:Weak)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#StrengthFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SeparablePrefix
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TüBa-D/Z
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	separable verb prefix, e.g., "Auch die Vertreter der AfB [stimmten] den 86 Millionen [zu]."
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Prefix
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#VulgarRegister
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	vulgar register
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf register (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1998
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Register of a term or text type that can be characterized as profane or socially unacceptable. (ISO12620; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1998)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#RegisterFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DiminutiveNoun
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	diminutive noun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2225
	subClassOf noun (dcif:isA); can be proper name (German Julchen from Julia, Russian Olichka from Olga) or common noun (German Blümchen from Blume "flower", Russian yozhik from yozh "hedgehock")
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	diminutive noun (MIRACL LSCA; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2225)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Noun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RelationNoun
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	relation noun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf partOfSpeech (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2226
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	relation noun (MIRACL & LSCA; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2226)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CommonNoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Anticausative
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Anticausative This is a semantic manipulation of the verb frame (and thus limited to a specific semantic class of verbs) rather than a grammatical device for the manipulation of argument structure, therefore classified as Active here.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An intransitive verb is derived from a basically transitive one with the direct object of the transitive verb corresponding to the subject of the intransitive. (Siewierska 1988:267) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Anticausative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ActiveVoice
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RemotePast
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/RemotePast, classified as absolute-relative here
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	RemotePastTense locates the situation in question prior to the present moment, usually more than a few days ago (Dahl 1985:121; Comrie 1985:88). Subsumes notion of PreHesternalPast tense, which locates the situation in question before that of an opposing hesternal past tense. (Bybee, Perkins, Pagliuca 1994: 98). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/RemotePast)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Past
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CollectivePronoun
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3006
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A pronoun that refers to all elements of a set.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Pronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PseudopassiveVoice
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3851
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	voice in a specify passive construction (different from the regular passive) where the patient is the syntactic subject and agent is the syntactic object
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PassiveVoice
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NegativeDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#NegativeDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Determiner/Type="negative" (Romanian) In Romanian the negative determiner is expressed by the unit nici + indefinite article (e.g. nici un, nici o). (MTE v4) e.g., nici-o/nici_un, nici_o/nici_un, nici_un, nici_unei/nici_un, nici_unii/nici_un, nici_unor/nici_un, nici_unui/nici_un (http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#NegativeDeterminer)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IndefiniteDeterminer
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Clitic
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	cliticness
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CliticElement
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1903 (cliticness), http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#Cliticness
	Deprecated: Note that the original MULTEXT-East definition of cliticness conflates four different aspects under this label: (a) whether an element *is* a clitic, (b) whether an element *contains* a clitic, (c) whether an element *should contain* a clitic that is, however, represented as a separate token, and (d) whether an element is part of a collocation. In the MULTEXT-East ontology (and here), this is made explicit by CliticElement, NoncliticElement, ElementWithClitic, ElementWithoutClitic and Collocation. Instead of the original "Clitic", CliticElement (state of being a clitic) and Cliticization (process of adding a clitic) are to be used
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Categorization of the different types of clitics (MultText-East; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1903)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Morpheme
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CommissiveModality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	commissive force
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3120
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	CommissiveForce indicates that the speaker promises or threatens to perform some action [Palmer 2001: 10, 72].
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ActionalModality
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RelativeMood
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3836
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Clarify relationship with DirectSpeech
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Mood to express reported speech (or indirect speech) as opposed to direct speech.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MoodFeature
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RelativeModality
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AdverbialModifier
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#adverbialModifier
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An adverbial modifier modifies a verb. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#adverbialModifier)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Modifier
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CircumstantialVoice
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3848
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	voice that promotes an oblique argument of a verb to the role of subject
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#VoiceFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AspirationalVerb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from Dzongkha tagset (Chungku et al. 2010, http://purl.org/olia/dzongkha.owl#AspirationalVerb)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	It is a verb, which indicates a strong desire to achieve something, without the doer. དག་པ ་ ང་ ་ ་བར་ ག། dag-pai zhing-lu kewa shÔ 'May i be born in pure land' (http://panl10n.net/english/Outputs%20Phase%202/CCs/Bhutan/Papers/2007/0701/PartOfSpeech.pdf)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MainVerb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SuperessiveCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Superessive, http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1396
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	SuperessiveCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location on which another referent exists. It has the meaning of 'on' or 'upon'. (Pei and Gaynor 1954: 207, Gove, et al. 1966: 2293). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Superessive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#OrdinalNumber
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Numeral with Type="Ordinal".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An ordinal number is a number belonging to a class whose members designate positions in a sequence, e.g. in English "First", "Second", "Third". (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAOrdinalNumeral.htm 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Numeral
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#WeakObligativeModality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3557
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	WeakObligativeModality indicates that an agent is under a moral obligation to perform the action expressed by the predicate [Bybee, Perkins and Pagliuca 1994: 186-187].
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ObligativeModality
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ImperativeMood
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Pertaining to the mood or mode of a verb form or clause such that it predicates a command, request, or exhortation (OED). (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#imperativeModality)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MoodFeature
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ImperativeModality
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PragmaticInverseVoice
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/PragmaticInverse
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	If the agent is more topical than the patient, the direct-active clause is used. If norm is reversed and the patient is more topical, the inverse clause is used. (Givon 1994:23) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/PragmaticInverse)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InverseVoice
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Collective
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	collective
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf grammaticalNumber (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	rename to CollectiveNumber
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1254
	Normally realized by derivation rather than inflection, unless other evidence is provided, OLiA follows *both* the modelling of EAGLES (Collective rdf:type Number) and the modelling of the MTE ontology (Collective rdf:type MorphologicalDerivation, cf. http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#Collective)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A collective number is a number referring to 'a set of things'. Languages that have this feature can use it to get a phrase like 'flock of sheeps' by using 'sheep' in collective number. (en2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_number; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1254)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#NumberFeature
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Derivation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#EvaluativeModality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	evaluative property
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3184 (EvaluativeProperty)
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	EvaluativeProperty: A term used in semantics for a type of modality where propositions express the speaker's attitude (e.g. surprise, regret) towards what is being said. [Crystal 2003: 168]
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ModalityFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PermissiveModality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3384
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	PermissiveModality indicates that an agent has permission to perform the action expressed by the predicate [Palmer 2001: 10, 71].
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ModalityFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CoordinatorField
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The KOORD-field is the field for coordinating particles in the German clause. In contrast to the PARORD-field, it can optionally occur as the left-most element of all clause types. (Telljohann et al. 2009, p.17)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#TopologicalField
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Possessive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	possessive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1355
	subClassOf referentType (dcif:conceptualDomain)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Relative to the possession or association. (www.wordreference.com/English/definition.asp?en=possessive; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1355)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ReferentTypeFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Utterance
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	utterance
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1409
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Complete unit of talk, bounded by the speaker's silence. (www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAnUtterance.htm; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1409)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#DiscourseEntity
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PrepositionalAdverb
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3000
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	adverb which is very similar in its form to a preposition
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Preposition
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adverb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Singular
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Singular is a grammatical number denoting a unit quantity (as opposed to the plural and other forms). (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singular 17.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#NumberFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DemonstrativeQuantifier
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#DemonstrativeQuantifier
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In the Czech and Slovak MTE v4 specs, Numeral/Class="demonstrative" are items meaning `this many/much', etc. Strictly speaking, they are pronumerals (pro-quantifiers), but traditional descriptions don't recognise such a category, so they are described variously as pronouns (because they contain a demonstrative element) or as numerals (because their syntactic distribution is that of numerals, or very close)." (Ivan A Derzhanski, email 2010/06/11, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#DemonstrativeQuantifier)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ProQuantifier
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AspectParticle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#AspectParticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In the Romanian MULTEXT-East scheme, a verbal particle with Particle/Type="aspect" modifies the verbs and carries information on the verb form, i.e., on its aspect (Dan Tufis, email 2010/06/09, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#AspectParticle)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#VerbalParticle
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SuspensionPoints
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	suspension points
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf partOfSpeech (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1447
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Sequence of three dots having the same meaning as "et cetera" (full form) or "etc" (abbreviated form). (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1447)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SentenceMedialPunctuation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#QuantificationalAspect
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Quantificational, http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#quantitativeAspect
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A speaker may report an event as occurring once only (semelfactive) or several times (iterative); he may view it as a specific event or as part of a general habit of carrying out similar events; he may also differentiate between different degrees of frequency with which the event occurs. The markers that a given language provides for one or more of these meaning distinctions can be grouped under a subcategory called “quantificational aspect", as all of them refer to the quantitative aspect of the event concerned (Bhat 1999:53). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Quantificational)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#AspectFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MannerNoun
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	manner noun
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:0
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3854
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	deprecated, as merely a shorthand for CommonNoun and hasSemanticRole some MannerRole
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	noun expressing a manner
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#EquativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1279
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Case that expresses likeness or identity to the referent of the noun it marks. It can have meaning, such as: 'as', 'like', or 'in the capacity of'. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1279)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SemiColon
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	semi-colon
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf partOfSpeech (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1446
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Sign (;) usually used to separate phrases. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1446)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SentenceMedialPunctuation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ListMarker
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	PTB bracketing guidelines, Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	LST — List marker. (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LayoutElement
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DurativeAspect
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Durative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Events which involve some duration (Bhat 1999:58). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Durative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#AspectFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AdmonitiveModality
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#admonitiveModality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Expression of warning (Bybee 1985:22) (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#admonitiveModality)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ModalityFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ReflexiveVoice
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#reflexiveVoice
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The reflexive voice is a grammatical voice in which the subject is both the agent and the patient or recipient. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#reflexiveVoice)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#VoiceFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasWordConjunct
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#WordCoordinatingConjunction
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:1
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasConjunct
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#HodiernalPast
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/HodiernalPast, classified as Past here
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	HodiernalPastTense locates the situation in question before the moment of utterance within the span culturally defined as 'today' (Comrie 1985:87; Dahl 1985:125-126). Contrasts with PreHodiernalPastTense. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/HodiernalPast)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Past
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MeasureArgument
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in conformance with TIGER
	TODO: check definition
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	added in conformance with TIGER
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AdnominalConstituent
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NominalizedVerb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#withNominalProperites
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A non-finite embedded construction which contains features with nominal properties (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#withNominalProperites, with reference to Dik 1997)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NonFiniteEmbeddedConstruction
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PartitiveDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TODO: Check the relationship between PartitiveDeterminer and PartitiveCase: The partitive case is a grammatical case which denotes "partialness", "without result", or "without specific identity" (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#partitiveCase, with reference to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partitive). PartitiveCase expresses the partial nature of the referent of the noun it marks, as opposed to expressing the whole unit or class of which the referent is a part. This case may be found in items such as the following: existential clauses, nouns that are accompanied by numerals or units of measure, or predications of material from which something is made. It often has a meaning similar to the English word 'some'. (GOLD, "Partitive"; see there for references)
	EAGLES Determiner with DetType="Partitive".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A partitive determiner indicates an indefinite quantity of a mass noun; there is no partitive article in English, though the words some or any often have that function. (Wilson and Leech 1996)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Determiner
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PossessiveAdjective
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#PossessiveAdjective
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A PossessiveAdjective is an denominal adjective, often derived from a ProperNoun, that serves to indicate possession in most Slavic languages. Unlike a genitival construction, a possessive adjective shows agreement with its head noun. (Chiarcos)
	Adjective/Type="possessive" are denominal, not pronominal expressions of possession (Ivan A Derzhanski, email 2010/06/09). Therefore not to be confused with Pronoun/Type=adjectival(a) (Bulgarian only), for words like умно /cleverly, wisely, sensibly/, which are derived from adjectives. (Dimitrova et al. 2009) e.g., Slovene dušikovima/dušikov, Marsovi/Marsov, Slovak vojvodova/vojvodov, vojvodove/vojvodov, vojvodovej/vojvodov, vojvodovho/vojvodov, vojvodovi/vojvodov, vojvodovmu/vojvodov, vojvodovo/vojvodov, vojvodovom/vojvodov, vojvodovou/vojvodov, Serbian evroazijske/evroazijska, evroazijskih/evroazijski, Goldštajnov, govornikov, Jehovine/Jehovin, malabarskom/malabarski, O'Brajenov, O'Brajenovog/O'Brajenov, oficirov, Czech Riegrovými/Riegrův, Stradellovými/Stradellův, Tristanovou/Tristanův, Wagnerových/Wagnerův, Wagnerovým/Wagnerův, Weberovi/Weberův, Weberových/Weberův, Wertherovi/Wertherův, Winstonovi/Winstonův (http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#PossessiveAdjective)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adjective
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MannerAdverb
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:2
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	DEPRECATED: equivalent to Adverb and hasSemanticRole some MannerRole from ILPOSTS, http://purl.org/olia/ilposts.owl#MannerAdverb
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adverb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NonInitial
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES, reimplemented as subhierarchy of CoordinatingConjunction
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	When two distinct words occur, as in German weder...noch..., then the second is given the Non-initial value. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node18.html#oav1av 17.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CoordTypeFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubjectControl
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.lexinfo.net/ontology/2.0/lexinfo#SubjectControl
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Indicates the subject of the main clause is the (omitted) subject of the subclause (http://www.lexinfo.net/ontology/2.0/lexinfo#SubjectControl)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Control
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TemporalisCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#TemporalisCase
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The so-called Temporalis Case is formed in Hungarian with -kor. Expresses a point of time or a period. (http://member.melbpc.org.au/~tmajlath/form-suffix.html)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#zuInclusion
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	zu inclusion
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1954
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Inclusion of zu. (DFKI; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1954)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Infix
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ConditionalIrrealisMood
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	ILPOSTS (Indian languages), http://purl.org/olia/ilposts.owl#NonReal is restricted to conditional participles, hence probably a subtype of ConditionalMood
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Conditional Mood (modality) with Irrealis meaning (ILPOSTS)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ConditionalMood
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ConditionalIrrealisModality
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Circumposition
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES adposition with optional attribute Type="Circumposition". The relationship between circumpositions and pre-/postpositions in EAGLES is not clear. We do not prohibit Circumpositions from being Prepositions or Postpositions, though the EAGLES feature assignment (with all optional values implemented) would possibly rule this out. (Chiarcos)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A circumposition is an adposition with a part before the noun phrase and a part after. It is much less common than prepositions or postpositions. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumposition 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adposition
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasObjectNumber
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#NumberFeature
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#domain	_:3
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	introduced for double agreement of transitive verbs, e.g., in Hungarian, see http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#FirstSgSecondSg
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Number of the object of a transitive verb. (Note that this does not entail of hasNumber).
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DeclarativeSentence
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:4
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Santorini 1991, Bies et al. 1995
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	S|Simple declarative clause, i.e. one that is not introduced by a (possibly empty) subordinating conjunction or wh-word and that does not exhibit subject-verb inversion. (Santorini 1991) Simple declarative sentences: (S (NP-SBJ Casey) (VP threw (NP the ball))) ... S â ´ Simple declarative clause, i.e. one that is not introduced by a (possibly empty) subordinating conjunction or wh-word and that does not exhibit subject-verb inversion. (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DeclarativeModality
	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SentenceTypeFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InceptiveAspect
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Inceptive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	InceptiveAspect, also called the ingressive, encodes the beginning portion of some event (Bybee 1985: 147, 149; Payne 1997: 240; Bhat 1999:176). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Inceptive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#AspectFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SecondHonorific
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TOCHECK: is SecondHonorific different from SecondPolite ?
	Adopted from ILPOSTS for Indian languages, http://purl.org/olia/ilposts.owl#Honorific
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Second
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InstrumentNoun
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3856
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:5
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	deprecated, as merely a shorthand for Noun and hasSemanticRole some InstrumentRole
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	noun expressing an instrument of the action
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InflectedWithOvertMarker
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Chiarcos, motivated by BaseForm in SUSANNE (Sampson 1995) and related schemes; cf. http://purl.org/olia/emille.owl#MarkedForGender
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An inflected form with overt morphological marking (as opposed to the base form and lexemes that do not inflect at all).
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Inflected
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ApproximateNumeral
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#ApproximateNumeral
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Bulgarian has Numeral/Form=approx(a), used for approximate numerals (десетина /about a ten/, стотина /about a hundred/) (Dimitrova et al. 2009, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#ApproximateNumeral)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Numeral
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#QualifierAdjective
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	qualifier adjective
	qualificative adjective
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1477, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#QualificativeAdjective
	subClassOf adjective (dcif:isA)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Adjective used to qualify. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1477)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Qualifier
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adjective
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#UniquitiveDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#UniquitiveDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Determiner/Type="exceptional" is applied to the Persian uniquitive determiner تنها i.e., "the only" (MTE v4; Hamidreza Kobdani, email 2010/06/15, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#UniquitiveDeterminer)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Determiner
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ProprietiveCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TDS Ontology, http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#proprietiveCase-grammatical
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Proprietive case marks a possessional relation, i.e. 'having' something. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#proprietiveCase-grammatical)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AffirmativeParticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	particule affirmative
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1918
	subClassOf particle (dcif:isA)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Particle used to express affirmation. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1918)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Particle
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ConditionalVerb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES finite verb with VerbForm="Conditional".
	TODO: reimplement with properties
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A conditional verb is a verb form in many languages. It is used to express degrees of certainty or uncertainty and hypothesis about past, present, or future. Such forms often occur in conditional sentences. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conditional_mood 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FiniteVerb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CorrelativeCoordinatingConjunction
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#CorrelativeCoordinatingConjunction
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	When the same word is also placed before the first conjunct, as in French "ou...ou...", the former occurrence is given the Correlative value and the latter the Simple value. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node18.html#oav1av 17.11.06)
	Conjunction/Coord_Type="correlat" (Romanian). In Romanian, there are three kinds of conjunctions depending on their usage: as such or together with other conjunctions or adverbs: (1) simple, between conjuncts: Ion ori Maria (John or Mary); (2) repetitive, before each conjunct: fie Ion fie Maria fie... (either John or Mary or...) (3) correlative, before a conjoined phrase, it requires specific coordinators between conjuncts: atât mama cât şi tata (both mother and father). (MTE v4, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#CorrelativeCoordinatingConjunction)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CoordinatingConjunction
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Specific
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#CliticSpecificDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	"By ʻspecificʼ and ʻnon-specificʼ I intend the difference between the two readings of English indefinites like (3): (3) Iʼm looking for a deer. In the specific reading there is a particular deer, say Bambi, that I am looking for. In the non-specific reading I will be happy to find any deer. Von Heusinger (2002) likes the test in English of inserting ʻcertainʼ after the ʻaʼ to fix the specific reading. In either reading of (3) a deer is being introduced as a new discourse referent. This is opposed to ʻdefiniteʼ which requires a previous pragmatic instantiation as in ʻIʼm looking for the deer.ʼ In English both the readings of (3) are indefinite. In Klallam, the specific demonstratives are neither definite nor indefinite." (Montler, Timothy. 2007. Klallam demonstratives. Papers ICSNL XLVII. The 42nd International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Language, pp. 409-425. University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics, Volume 20; on specific vs. nonspecific determiners in Klallam, a Salish language, http://montler.net/papers/KlallamDemons.pdf)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SpecificityFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InstrumentalCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TDS Ontology, http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#instrumentalCase-grammatical; GOLD, http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Instrumental; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1316
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	InstrumentalCase indicates that the referent of the noun it marks is the means of the accomplishment of the action expressed by the clause (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Instrumental)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MassNoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Noun with Countability="Mass".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A mass noun (also uncountable noun or non-count noun) can't be modified by a numeral, occur in singular/plural or co-occur with the relevant kind of determiner. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_noun 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:6
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#HodiernalFuture
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/HodiernalFuture, classified as Future here
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	HodiernalFutureTense locates the situation in question after the moment of utterance within the span culturally defined as 'today' (Comrie 1985: 86; Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca 1994: 247). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/HodiernalFuture)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Future
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LocationalCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Locational
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Category of case that denotes that the referent of the noun it marks is a location. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Locational)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DemonstrativeAdverb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/urdu.owl#AdverbialDemonstrative, http://purl.org/olia/emille.owl#DistalDemonstrativeAdverb
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Pronominal adverb derived from a demonstrative stem (Ch. Chiarcos)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PronominalAdverb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PastPerfectTense
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Past perfect
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1348
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	denoting a tense of verbs used in relating past events where the action had already occurred at the time of the action of a main verb that is itself in a past tense. In English this is a compound tense formed with had plus the past participle (www.wordreference.com/English/definition.asp?en=past+perfect; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1348)
	Past perfect tense is an absolute-relative tense that refers to a time in the past relative to a reference point, which itself is in the past relative to the moment of utterance (www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsPastPerfectTense.htm; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1348)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AbsoluteRelativeTense
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSentenceConjunct
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#SentenceCoordinatingConjunction
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasConjunct
	_:7
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Separable
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES; note that UbyPos extends separability to particles
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A separable verb is a verb that is composed of a verb stem and a separable affix. In some verb forms, the verb appears in one word, whilst in others the verb stem and the affix are separated. German and Dutch are notable for having many separable verbs. For example, the Dutch verb "aankomen" is a separable verb. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separable_verb 20.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SeparabilityFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DelativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Delative, http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1268
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	DelativeCase expresses motion downward from the referent of the noun it marks (Pei and Gaynor 1954: 53; Gove, et al. 1966: 595). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Delative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NonabsolutiveAntipassive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/NonabsolutiveAntipassive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An Antipassive in which the P or logical object is overtly downgraded. (Klaiman 1991:232) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/NonabsolutiveAntipassive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Antipassive
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#HeadOfNP
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES NPFunction="head"
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The HeadFunction is a function of an adjective or participle that can serve as the focus of the phrase.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Head
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Space
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	space
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2189
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Empty area between words, lines or columns (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2189)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#GraphicalSeparator
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InterrogativeMultiplicativeQuantifier
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3021 (InterrogativeMultiplicativeNumeral)
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An interrogative/relative word used to ask about the number of times something happened.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InterrogativeQuantifier
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Correlative
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	from EAGLES, reimplemented as subhierarchy of CoordinatingConjunction
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	When the same word is also placed before the first conjunct, as in French "ou...ou...", the former occurrence is given the Correlative value and the latter the Simple value. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node18.html#oav1av 17.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CoordTypeFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#EmphaticDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:8
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	deprecated: merely shorthand for Determiner and hasEmphasis some Emphatic
	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#EmphaticDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Determiner/Type="emphatic" (Romanian) In Romanian, there are specific forms for the so-called emphatic determiner, which may accompany both a noun and a personal pronoun: fata însăşi (the girl herself), also ea însăşi (she herself). e.g., însele/însumi, însemi/însumi, însene/însumi, însevă/însumi, înseşi/însumi, înseţi/însumi, însumi, însuşi/însumi, însuţi/însumi (http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#EmphaticDeterminer)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Determiner
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MediopassiveVoice
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:9
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3850
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	voice which subsumes both the middle voice and the passive voice
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#VoiceFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AspectMarkingAuxiliary
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from Sajjad (2007) for Urdu, cf. http://purl.org/olia/urdu.owl#AspectualAuxiliary
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An auxiliary that marks exclusively aspect, e.g., in Urdu: Auxiliaries: Based on the syntactic nature of Urdu, auxiliaries are divided into two categories. Aspectual auxiliaries always occur after main verb of the sentence. Tense auxiliaries are used to show the time of the action. They occurred at the end of the verb phrase (Sajjad 2007). E.g., Urdu rahā, an auxiliary element is used to mark the durative aspect. (Hardie 2004, http://purl.org/olia/emille.owl#RahaAuxiliary)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#StrictAuxiliaryVerb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SemelfactiveAspect
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Semelfactive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Momentaneous, without an inherent end-point, as sneeze (Michaelis 1998:xvi). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Semelfactive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#AspectFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubordinatingConjunctionWithComparative
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	For example, in German the subordinating conjunction "als" is followed by various kinds of comparative clause (including clauses without finite verbs). (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node19.html#oav2u 17.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubordinatingConjunction
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FrequentiveAspect
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Frequentive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Events which are frequently repeated, differs from habitual in that it can only be based upon the observation of several occurrences of the event concerned, whereas habitual can be based upon the observation of a single occurrence (Bhat 1999: 53). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Frequentive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#AspectFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SuperallativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Superallative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	SuperallativeCase expresses that something is moving toward the region that is above the referent of the noun it marks. It has the meaning 'towards the region that is over'. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Superallative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ContextualVariation
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1977
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Variation on a particular usage or immediate proximity of words.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Possible
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RemoteFuture
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/RemoteFuture, classified as Future here
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	RemoteFutureTense locates the situation in question at a time that is considered relatively distant. It is characteristically after the span of time culturally defined as 'tomorrow' (Dahl 1985:121; Comrie 1985:94). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/RemoteFuture)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Future
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ComparativeParticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	comparative particle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf particle (dcif:isA)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1922
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Particle used to compare. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1922)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Particle
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AbsolutiveCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TDS Ontology, http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1225
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Absolutive case marks the first argument of an intransitive verb and the second argument of a transitive verb in ergative-absolutive languages. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#absolutiveCase)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ExclamatoryAdverb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES WHAdverb with Wh-Type="Exclamatory".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An ExclamatoryAdverb seves to express exclamation, cf. how in "How well everyone played!" Exclamative sentences or exclamatives An exclamatory sentence or exclamation is generally a more emphatic form of statement, in particular, they are used are used to express strong feelings (Latin exclamare : "to call out, to cry out"). (http://english.unitecnology.ac.nz/resources/resources/exp_lang/sentence.html 07.05.07, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentence_(linguistics) 07.05.07)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#WHTypeAdverbs
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#QuestionPredicate
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Santorini 1991, Bies et al. 1995
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	SQ â ´ Inverted yes/no question, or main clause of a wh-question, following the wh-phrase in SBARQ. (Bies et al. 1995) SQ|That part of an SBARQ that excludes the wh-word or wh-phrase. See Section 5.32. (Santorini 1991) The SBARQ label marks wh-questions (i.e., those that contain a gap and therefore require a trace). A further level of structure, SQ, contains the inverted auxiliary (if there is one) and the rest of the sentence. The inverted auxiliary in wh-questions is not labeled. ... SQ (See also section 1.2.7.) â ¢ inside SBARQ: As described above, inside wh-questions, SQ holds the subject, inverted auxiliary (if any), main verb phrase, and some adjuncts. â ¢ yes/no questions: SQ is used for yes/no questions (i.e., those with inversion but no wh-movement). ... â ¢ subject-less yes/no questions: In questions where the auxiliary and subject do not appear, the auxiliary is unlabeled and a null subject (NP-SBJ *) is used. ... Note that questions with overt subjects and auxiliaries that show declarative word order are simply labeled S. â ¢ Tag questions: Tag questions are treated as an adjunction of SQ to S. The resulting structure is labeled SQ, since the whole thing is interrogative in nature. The lower SQ is annotated to show predicate deletion; that is, an appropriate null *?* is inserted. (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Question
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DemonstrativeModifier
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#demonstrativeModifier
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A nominal is modified by a demonstrative. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#demonstrativeModifier)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AdnominalConstituent
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubterminativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Subterminative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	SubterminativeCase expresses the notion of something moving into the region under the referent of the noun it marks, but not through that region. It has the meaning 'into the region under'. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Subterminative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#VoiceNoun
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	voice noun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2253
	subClassOf partOfSpeech (dcif:conceptualDomain)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	noun of a voice (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2253)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Noun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#WithInfinite
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES, reimplemented within SubordinatingConjunction taxonomy
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	For example, in German the subordinating conjunction "ohne" ("zu"...) is followed by an infinitive. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node19.html#oav2u 17.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SubordTypeFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SimpleFuture
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Future, cf. http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Past
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	FutureTense locates the situation in question after the present moment, with no specification on the distance in time. (adapted from the definition of http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Past)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Future
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Honorific
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	honorific
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2347
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	special form of language used when talking about those in positions of social situation (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2347)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Possible
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Stem
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	stem
	base
	root
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1389
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Root of a word, together with any derivational affixes, to which inflectional affixes are added. (www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAStem.htm; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1389)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Morpheme
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CompoundPreposition
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	compound preposition
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf preposition (dcif:isA)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1934
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Preposition that is a aggregation of words (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1934)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Preposition
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#VolitiveModality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	volitive force
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3555
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	VolitiveForce indicates that the speaker is willing to perform some action [Palmer 2001: 76].
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ModalityFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AntiCausativeVoice
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3080
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An intransitive verb is derived from a basically transitive one with the direct object of the transitive verb corresponding to the subject of the intransitive [Siewierska 1988: 267].
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#VoiceFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#DependencyRelation
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SyntacticRelation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Transgressive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Transgressive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1404
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	present (action in the same time as of the predicate): The dog going through the house barks. past (action premature to the one of predicate): He has started to read the book after he had sat down. (ark.wz.cz/cidarke/mverb.html; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1404)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Present
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Initialism
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-333
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from ubyPos.owl
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Abbreviation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Phraseme
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:10
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/ubyPos.owl#phraseme, no definition there
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Conventional lexical unit consisting of a particular phrase (CC)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FixedExpression
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ZeroPronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	PTB bracketing guidelines, Santorini 1991, Bies et al. 1995; often considered as extremely weak form of personal pronouns (Ariel 1990; Givón 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	*|An asterisk represents a zero pronoun; it may need to be deleted. ... * is used to represent the empty subject of gerunds, imperatives and to-infinitive clauses. (Santorini 1991) (NP *) â ´ arbitrary PRO, controlled PRO, and trace of A-movement (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PersonalPronoun
	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#NullElement
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NumeralModifier
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#numeralModifier
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A nominal is modified by a numeral. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#numeralModifier)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AdnominalConstituent
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#EssiveFormalCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#EssiveFormalCase
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The Hungarian "formativus, or essivus-formalis `-ként' ... usually expresses a position, task and manner of the person or the thing." (Nose 2003), e.g., Hungarian 'katonaként' -> [serves] as a soldier. (Csaba Oravecz, email 2010/06/15) "Haspelmath & Buchholz (1998:321) explained the function of the essive case as ``role phrases''. Role phrases represent the role of the function in which a participant appears. They regard the role phrases as adverbial." (Nose 2003, p. 117) In the Hungarian language this case combines the Essive case and the Formal case, and it can express the position, task, state (e.g. "as a tourist"), or the manner (e.g. "like a hunted animal"). The status of the suffix -ként in the declension system is disputed for several reasons. First, in general, Hungarian case suffixes are absolute word-final, while -ként permits further suffixation by the locative suffix -i. Second, most Hungarian case endings participate in vowel harmony, while -ként does not. For these reasons, many modern analyses of the Hungarian case system, starting with László Antal's "A magyar esetrendszer" (1961) do not consider the essive/formal to be a case. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essive-formal_case) cf. Masahiko Nose (2003), Adverbial Usage of the Hungarian Essive Case
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PresentativePronoun
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3015
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Should be redefined in terms of deixis
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	pronoun that identify the current locative or temporal situation
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Pronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TargetRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added as counterpart of SourceRole, see there
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The target role instantiates the destination of an event or entity.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DirectionRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FusedPreposition
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	fused preposition
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf preposition (dcif:isA)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1901
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Preposition that is the result of a morphological merge from at least two words. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1901)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Preposition
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DebitiveMood
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3835
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Mood to express necessity or requirement
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MoodFeature
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DebitiveModality
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubordinatingConjunctionWithInfinite
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	For example, in German the subordinating conjunction "ohne" ("zu"...) is followed by an infinitive. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node19.html#oav2u 17.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubordinatingConjunction
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InterrogativeParticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	interrogative particle
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:11
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf particle (dcif:isA)
	TODO: check relationship with interrogative adverb
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1921
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Particle used to express a question. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1921)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Particle
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RelativePast
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/RelativePast
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	RelativePastTense locates the situation in question before that of a contextually determined temporal reference point (Comrie 1985: 104). Also called PastPerfectTense. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/RelativePast)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RelativeTense
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CountableNoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Noun with Countability="Countable".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A countable noun (also count noun) is a noun which can be modified by a numeral and occur in both singular and plural form, as well as co-occurring with quantificational determiners like every, each, several, most, etc.. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Countable_noun 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:12
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SecondPolite
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES PersonalPronoun attribute Politeness="Polite". The EAGLES attribute politeness (polite/ familiar) is limited to second-person pronouns. In French, for example, it is possible to treat Polite simply as pragmatic values encoded through other attributes - especially person and number. In languages where there are special polite pronoun forms (e.g. Dutch u and Spanish usted), the additional Politeness attribute is required. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node18.html#oav1p 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In several European languages exist special forms of pronouns for polite or respectful reference, e.g. Dutch u and Spanish usted. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node18.html#oav1p 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Second
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubstitutivePronoun
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:13
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	introduced to account for non-attributive pronouns, see olia:AttributivePronoun
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	non-attributive pronoun
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Pronoun
	_:14
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Lative; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1323
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	LativeCase expresses 'motion up to the location of,' or 'as far as' the referent of the noun it marks (Pei and Gaynor 1954: 121; Gove, et al. 1966: 1277). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Lative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FactiveCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#FactiveCase
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	case category of the Hungarian MULTEXT-East scheme, e.g., amilyenné/amilyen, azzá/az, erőddé/erő, jelmezeivé/jelmez, jelükké/jel, kevéssé/kevés, Kissé/Kiss, legjelentéktelenebbekké/jelentéktelen (hu) (http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#FactiveCase)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RelativeQuantifier
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#RelativeQuantifier
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In the Czech MTE v4 specs, Numeral/Class="relative" are items meaning `how many/much', `as many/much' etc. Strictly speaking, they are pronumerals (pro-quantifiers), but traditional descriptions don't recognise such a category, so they are described variously as pronouns or as numerals (because their syntactic distribution is that of numerals, or very close)." (Ivan A Derzhanski, email 2010/06/11, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#RelativeQuantifier)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ProQuantifier
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NeutralRegister
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	standard register
	neutral register
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf register (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1999
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The register appropriate to general texts or discourse. (ISO12620; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1999)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#RegisterFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#QuestionMark
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	interrogative point
	question mark
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf partOfSpeech (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1444
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Sign used to express a question. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1444)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SentenceFinalPunctuation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#GivenName
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	introduced as generalization over http://purl.org/olia/ubyPos.owl#nounProperFirstName
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In most European cultures, a given name designates an individual person throughout her/his life span. To distinguish people with the same name but from different families, additional elements have been introduced into name formulas that identify a person's family or ancestry. (CC)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ProperNoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PlainMiddle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/PlainMiddle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Results of action occur to subject. (Siewierska 1988:257) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/PlainMiddle)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MiddleVoice
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SecondNonHonorific
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Adopted from ILPOSTS for Indian languages, http://purl.org/olia/ilposts.owl#NonHonorific
	TOCHECK: is SecondNonHonorific different from SecondFamiliar ?
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Second
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DirectVoice
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/DirectVoice
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Signals that the action proceeds in an ontologically salient way, i.e. that salience is assigned to nominals based on their referent's relative real-world capacities to control situations. (Klaiman 1991:32) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/DirectVoice)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ActiveVoice
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#BrokenPlural
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	broken plural
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf plural (dcif:isA)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2218
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Internal plural that do not have any inflection. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2218)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Plural
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#WHAdverbPhrase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in conformance with PTB bracketing guidelines (Santorini 1991, Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	WHADVP|Wh-adverb phrase. Phrasal category headed by a wh-adverb such as how or why. (Santorini 1991) WHADVP â ´ Wh-adverb Phrase. Introduces a clause with an ADVP gap. May be null (containing the 0 complementizer) or lexical, containing a wh-adverb such as how or why. (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AdverbPhrase
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#HonorificVerb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from Dzongkha tagset (Chungku et al. 2010, http://purl.org/olia/dzongkha.owl#HonorificVerb)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Dzongkha uses honorific forms: ན་བཟའ་/nam za/ (cloths) is the honorific form of the noun གོ་ ལ་/gola/(cloths), གསངས་/sung/(tell) the honorific form of the verb སབ་/lab/(tell). We opted to mark them by adding the tag NNH (honorific common noun) and VBH (honorific verb) to enable future research on this specific usage of Dzongkha language. A number of tags were added to the set, of which we describe four in more detail: two of the additional tags are subclasses of verbs: VBH (honorific verb form), and VBN which describes past participle forms, like, e.g. བངམ་/jun/(created), the past particle form of བང་/jung/(create).
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MainVerb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TitleNoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in accordance with Sajjad (2007, for Urdu, http://purl.org/olia/urdu.owl#Title)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A title designates the function or the social status of an individual. Often, it accompanies a proper noun, but it can also be used in place of a proper noun (if the bearer of the title is contextually unambiguous). E.g. "The/Det German/Adj Chancellor/Title Angela/Name Merkel/Name said ..." can be used besides "the German Chancellor said ...". Accordingly, some schemes (e.g., Chungku et al. 2010, for Dzongkha) group titles together with proper names (http://purl.org/olia/dzongkha.owl#ParticularPersonNoun). However, if multiple people hold the same title, they can be referred to as a group, e.g., "Since WWII, the politics of the German chancellors always followed ...", and in this usage, titles are more comparable to common nouns. Functionally, titles are thus an intermediate category between CommonNoun and ProperNoun (cf. also Mulkern 1996). Titles do, however, share important characteristics with common nouns. In English, for example, titles generally require a definite determiner (unlike proper nouns), even if unambiguous ("the pope"). They are thus classified here as a subtype of CommonNoun. (Ann E. Mulkern. The name of the game. In Jeanette Gundel and Thorstein Fretheim, editors. Reference and Referent Accessibility: Pragmatics and Beyond. John Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, 1996, pages 235–250.)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CommonNoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ConditionalParticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	conditional particule
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	DCR subClassOf particle (dcif:isA)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2230
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	conditional particule (MIRACL & LSCA; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2230)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Particle
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CausativeCase
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	causative case
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1253
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Case which expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the cause of the situation expressed by the clause. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1253)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#GenitiveCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES-recommended case feature
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Genitive case signals that the referent of the marked noun is the possessor of the referent of another noun, e.g. "the man's foot". In some languages, genitive case may express an associative relation between the marked noun and another noun. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/glossaryoflinguisticterms/WhatIsGenitiveCase.htm 17.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NonspecificArticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	nonspecific determiner
	nonspecific article
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	introduced in analogy with SpecificArticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	"By ʻspecificʼ and ʻnon-specificʼ I intend the difference between the two readings of English indefinites like (3): (3) Iʼm looking for a deer. In the specific reading there is a particular deer, say Bambi, that I am looking for. In the non-specific reading I will be happy to find any deer. Von Heusinger (2002) likes the test in English of inserting ʻcertainʼ after the ʻaʼ to fix the specific reading. In either reading of (3) a deer is being introduced as a new discourse referent. This is opposed to ʻdefiniteʼ which requires a previous pragmatic instantiation as in ʻIʼm looking for the deer.ʼ In English both the readings of (3) are indefinite. In Klallam, the specific demonstratives are neither definite nor indefinite." (Montler, Timothy. 2007. Klallam demonstratives. Papers ICSNL XLVII. The 42nd International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Language, pp. 409-425. University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics, Volume 20; on specific vs. nonspecific determiners in Klallam, a Salish language, http://montler.net/papers/KlallamDemons.pdf)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Article
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Slash
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	slash
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf partOfSpeech (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	Parenthetical in Russian (instead of "(", ")"), sentence medial in English
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1437
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The punctuation sign / (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1437)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SecondaryPunctuation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RaisableSubject
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:15
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	from http://lemon-model.net/lemon#RaisableSubject, deprecated because this is just a shorthand for Raising and SyntacticSubject
http://purl.org/olia/hasSemanticRole
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SemanticRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ModernUsage
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	modern
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf dating (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1962 (modern)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Currently in use. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1962)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TemporallyDefinedUsage
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#HaveAuxiliary
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	have
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf partOfSpeech (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1299
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The verb have as an auxiliary. (www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAnAuxiliaryVerb.htm; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1299)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#StrictAuxiliaryVerb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ObjectiveCase
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2798
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Case used to express the direct object, indirect object, object of a preposition, object complement and subject of an infinitive.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RelativeAdverb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Adverb with Wh-Type="Relative".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The value relative is used for adverbs in clear relative cases as in: "The place 'where' I met you.", "The reason 'why' I did it." (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/pub/eagles/lexicons/elm_en.ps.gz, p.33, 07.05.07)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#WHTypeAdverbs
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ReflexivePossessiveDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:16
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	shorthand for ReflexiveDeterminer and PossessiveDeterminer, relevant for MULTEXT-East (Slavic) and EMILLE (Urdu), http://purl.org/olia/emille.owl#ReflexivePossessiveAdjective
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Attributive possessive pronoun form of the reflexive pronoun, e.g., Russian свой: Обама на свой день рождения угощал гостей стейками и хот-догами. Obama on his day of.birth entertained guests with.steaks and hot.dogs "On his birthday, Obama entertained his guests with steaks and hot dogs." (http://ua.rian.ru/world_news/20110805/78815136.html) The antecedent of a possessive reflexive is not determined by its gender, but by its syntactic prominence.
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Aorist
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	aorist
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1240
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Simple past tense that is predominantly used for narration. Both the perfective and the imperfective forms can be used in the aorist without any restrictions. (www.helsinki.fi/~bontchev/grammar/index.html; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1240)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Past
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ConditionalPronoun
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	conditional pronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2222
	subClassOf pronoun (dcif:isA)
	check for a definition
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	conditional pronoun (MIRACL & LSCA; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2222)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Pronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ContlativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Contlative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	ContlativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location in the vicinity of which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'in the vicinity of'. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Contlative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Typo
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#Typo
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	a mis-typed word
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Residual
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Trace
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	PTB bracketing guidelines, Bies et al. (1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	T|Trace. Marks the position where a fronted wh-constituent is interpreted. ... T marks the spot where an argument NP that has been moved by wh-movement or relative clause formation is interpreted. For instance, the relative clause the man that I saw should be bracketed as follows, by analogy to the corresponding simple declarative I saw the man. (NP (NP the man) (SBAR that (S (NP I) (VP saw) (NP T))))) T is also used to represent the empty subjects of as-clauses. (Santorini 1991) *T* â ´ trace of Aâ ²-movement (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#NullElement
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Copula
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	copula
	copule
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Adopted from the SFB632 annotation guidelines. In EAGLES, copulas are not distinguished from auxiliaries, hence represented as such here.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A copula is an intransitivity verb which links a subject to a noun phrase, an adjective or an other constituent which expresses the predicate. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsACopula.htm 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AuxiliaryVerb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Feminine
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES, http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#feminineGender
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Feminine gender is a grammatical gender that marks nouns, articles, pronouns, etc. that have human or animal female referents, and often marks nouns that have referents that do not carry distinctions of sex. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node19.html#oav2at 17.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#GenderFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Intransitive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	SUSANNE (Sampson 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A predicate/verb that takes one argument, e.g., English "to go", cf. van Valin and Lapolla (1997).
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ValencyFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#UnaccomplishedAspect
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	unaccomplished
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2217
	subClassOf aspect (dcif:conceptualDomain)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	aspect that expresses an event or state that is not finished. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2217)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#AspectFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AgentRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#agentRole
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An agentive role is one in which the actor exerts some degree of will(-power) in the execution of the event. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#agentRole)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ActorMacroRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LeftDislocationField
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The German Linksversetzungsfeld is a field for the left-dislocated phrase of resumptive constructions. A Linksversetzung is a pendent constituent. It can be regarded as a syntactic anticipation of a part of a sentence (Telljohann et al. 2009, p.16)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Extraposition
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Fronting
	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#TopologicalField
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#YesNoQuestion
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Santorini 1991, Bies et al. 1995
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	There are two types of direct questions: yes-no questions and wh-questions. Yes-no questions should be bracketed as SQ. The auxiliary verb or form of do that precedes the subject in a yes-no question is a child of SQ. Note that yes-no questions need not contain a VP node (Santorini 1991)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DirectQuestion
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Frame
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Introduced to account for semantic frames in lexinfo, note that full-fledged semantic role annotation is subject to specialized resources (FrameNet, Verbnet, etc.) and beyond the scope of OLiA. For compliance with lexinfo, however, these have been added to OLiA.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	According to "Frame Semantics, deriving from the work of Charles J. Fillmore and colleagues (Fillmore 1976, 1977, 1982, 1985, Fillmore and Baker 2001, 2010) ... [,] the meanings of most words can best be understood on the basis of a semantic frame: a description of a type of event, relation, or entity and the participants in it. For example, the concept of cooking typically involves a person doing the cooking (Cook), the food that is to be cooked (Food), something to hold the food while cooking (Container) and a source of heat (Heating_instrument)." (https://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu/fndrupal/about)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LexicalUnit
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Date
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from Sajjad (2007, for Urdu, cf. http://purl.org/olia/urdu.owl#Date)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Date is a stretch of text that specifies a specific point in time and that is not further linguistically analysed. (Chiarcos)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Residual
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ConterminativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Conterminative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	ConterminativeCase expresses the notion of something moving into the vicinity of the referent of the noun it marks, but not through that region. It has the meaning 'moving into the vicinity of'. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Conterminative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Inanimate
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	inanimate
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf animacy (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1952
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Perceived as not living. (ISO12620; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1952)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#AnimacyFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TechnicalRegister
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	technical register
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf register (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1997
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The register appropriate to scientific texts or special languages. (ISO12620; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1997)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#RegisterFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#GenitiveAttribute
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TODO: check definition
	added in conformance to the TIGER scheme
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	added in conformance to the TIGER scheme
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AdnominalConstituent
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CloseParenthesis
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	close parenthesis
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1440
	subClassOf partOfSpeech (dcif:conceptualDomain)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	End of a parenthesis pair. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1440)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RightParentheticalPunctuation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NegativePronoun
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	negative pronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1925
	subClassOf pronoun (dcif:isA), reclassification as IndefinitePronoun follows EAGLES and STTS praxis
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Pronoun used in a context of a negation or for expressing a negation. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1925)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IndefinitePronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Weak
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Weak pronouns are helping pronouns many languages have for easily explaining the possessive status of something, to which something belongs. Many languages have different ways to express this. For example, English has distinctive words for all of these: "my", "mine". Germanic languages and Romance languages have the same, but inflect them for gender: (Spanish example) "mío", "mía", "míos" and "mías" ("mine", in the masculine singular, feminine singular, masculine plural, and feminine plural form, respectively). (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_pronoun 20.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#StrengthFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#EmbeddedParticiple
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	participle construction
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#withParticipleAsHead, http://purl.org/olia/tcodex.owl#ParticipialConstruction
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A participle is the head of the embedded construction. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#withParticipleAsHead) Participial constructions are used as adjunct clauses in Old High German. As they lack a finite verb form they are kept separately from finite subordinate clauses. (http://purl.org/olia/tcodex.owl#ParticipialConstruction)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NonFiniteEmbeddedConstruction
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SuperlativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Superlative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	SuperlativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location onto which another referent is moving. It has the meaning of 'onto'. Unfortunate name clash with 'Superlative' as a property of adjectives. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Superlative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#DominanceRelation
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SyntacticRelation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasUsage
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#UsageAndFrequencyFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1965
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The relative commonness with which a term occurs. (ISO12620; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1965)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AdverbialParticiple
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#AdverbialParticiple
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Adverb/Type="participle" is used in the Slovene MTE v4 specs, e.g., 'leže' / lying. Slovenian adverbial participles are, however, not attested for Resian. (MTE v4)(http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#AdverbialParticiple)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Participle
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adverb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FinalField
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In a German clause, the finite verb can appear in three different positions: verb-second, verb-initial, and verb-final. Only in verb-final clauses the verb complex consisting of the finite verb and non-finite verbal elements forms a unit. The discontinuous positioning of the verbal elements in verb-first and verb-second clauses is the traditional reason for structuring German clauses into fields. The positions of the verbal elements form the Satzklammer (sentence bracket) which divides the sentence into a Vorfeld (initial field), a Mittelfeld (middle field), and a Nachfeld (final field). The Vorfeld and the Mittelfeld are divided by the linke Satzklammer (left sentence bracket), which is the finite verb, the rechte Satzklammer (right sentence bracket) is the verb complex between the Mittelfeld and the Nachfeld. (Telljohann et al. 2009, p.13)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#TopologicalField
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DifferentialPronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TOCHECK: maybe this is a quantifier ?
	adopted from Dzongkha tagset (Chungku et al. 2010)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A pronoun, which classifies or differentiates(pronoun) by a single basis, like everybody; each; individual etc. འ ག་པ ་ ་ ར་ ག་ར་ ན་ ང་ ང་ཁ་ ས་ད ། Drupai Miser Gara Enrung Dzongkha ShegÔ 'Every Bhutanese must know Dzongkha' (http://panl10n.net/english/Outputs%20Phase%202/CCs/Bhutan/Papers/2007/0701/PartOfSpeech.pdf)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Pronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NonspecificPronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#NonspecificPronoun
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In the Russian MTE v4 specs, Pronoun/Type="nonspecific" marks the following Russian words: весь 'all', всякий 'any, every', сам 'oneself', самый 'the very', каждый 'every, each', иной 'other', любой 'any', другой 'other'. The name "nonspecific" follows Halliday (1985, Section 6.2.1.1). (MTE v4) A nonspecific pronoun refers to an unidentified or general entity (e.g., "I saw *someone*", "I saw *everyone*"). A nonspecific pronoun is not, therefore, a personal pronoun, but an indefinite one. (Andrews 2003). Andrews, Richard J. (2003), Introduction to Classical Nahuatl. University of Oklahoma Press. Halliday, M.A.K. (1985), An introduction to Functional Grammar, London: Edward Arnold (http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#NonspecificPronoun)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:17
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IndefinitePronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NucleonicMiddle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/NucleonicMiddle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Object of action belongs to. Moves into, or moves from sphere of subject. (Siewierska 1988:257) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/NucleonicMiddle)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MiddleVoice
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ImpersonalPronoun
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	impersonal pronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1426
	subClassOf pronoun (dcif:isA)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Pronoun lacking person referent. (Gil Francopoulo; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1426) More precisely, a form of pronoun that denotes the absence of a concrete or specific referent, e.g., German "man". As opposed to IndefinitePronoun, this referent is not just discourse-new, but generic or hypothetical.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IndefinitePronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DitransitiveTheme
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#T
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Ditransitive theme (T) (Siewierska 2004:57). (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#T)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DirectObject
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SimpleAspect
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	ILPOSTS, http://purl.org/olia/ilposts.owl#SimpleAspect
	TODO: check whether this is properly defined
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	non-progressive, non-purposive aspect (for Indian languages defined by http://purl.org/olia/ilposts.owl#SimpleAspect)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#AspectFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PreNominalModifier
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES, NPFunction="premodifying", cf. http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1943 (preModifier, but without reference to nominal heads)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Premodifying is a function of an adjective that can modify a following noun. (EAGLES) modificationType: Refers to the prenominal or postnominal positions of determiners which distinguish different forms. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1931)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AdnominalConstituent
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Topicalization
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	PTB bracketing guidelines, Bies et al. 1995
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Topicalization structures are ones where a non-subject immediately precedes a subject, which immediately precedes the verb/auxiliary of the sentence. Two examples: Pizza, John likes. Tomorrow, I will go to the store. Such examples should be bracketed as adjunction structures. (Santorini 1991) -TPC (“topicalized”) — marks elements that appear before the subject in a declarative sentence, but in two cases only: (i) if the fronted element is associated with a *T* in the position of the gap. (ii) if the fronted element is left-dislocated (i.e., it is associated with a resumptive pronoun in the position of the gap). (See the section on fronted elements in section 1 [Overview of Basic Clause Structure] for more details on the treatment of fronted elements and the section on *T* with fronted elements in section 4 [Null Elements] for more details on the distribution of *T*.) (Bies et al. 1995) Fronted elements are placed inside the top clause level (e.g. S, SINV, SQ, SBAR). (Only certain fronted elements are tagged -TPC: (i) constituents associated with a *T* in the position of the gap and (ii) left-dislocated constituents (those associated with a resumptive pronoun in the position of the gap).) (See section 1 [Overview of Basic Clause Structure] for more details on the treatment of fronted elements.) (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Fronting
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Nominal
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Bies et al. 1995
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	-NOM (nominal) — marks free (“headless”) relatives and gerunds when they act nominally. (See section 9 [WH-Phrases] for more information about free relatives, and section 13 [Gerunds and Participles] for more information about gerunds.) (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SyntacticFunction
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasReferentType
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ReferentTypeFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1376 (referentType)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ElementWithClitic
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#ElementWithClitic"
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Expression representing a lexeme together with its clitics (Chiarcos)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Cliticization
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Image
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	image
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2249
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	graphical representation (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2249)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LayoutElement
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Masdar
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	masdar
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2224
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	property that expresses a verbal idea under an abstract form. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2224) the verbal noun present in Arabic and various Caucasian languages, such as Georgian and North-Caucasian languages. This grammatical term is an Arabic word, used later as a specialized, technical term to name the verbal noun in Arabic and Caucasian grammar. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masdar)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#VerbalNoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ComplementClause
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Santorini 1991
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In noun phrases like the fact that she is late, the subordinate clause that she is late is a complement of the noun fact and should not be confused with a relative clause. (Note that the embedded clause she is late is not missing a constituent; by contrast, in a relative clause construction like the TV that she bought the other day, the clause that she bought the other day is incomplete.) The entire noun phrase should be bracketed as a sister of the head noun. (NP the fact (SBAR that (S (NP she) (VP is (ADJP late))))) (Santorini 1991)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubordinateClause
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CliticSpecificArticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	clitic specific determiner
	clitic specific article
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#CliticSpecificDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Persian does have an article, but it marks specificity rather than definiteness. The Persian article is similar to the Balkan one (a clitic of pronominal origin that's written together with the word), except that it isn't exactly definite (you can even see it described as an indefinite article). (Ivan A. Derzhanski, p.c. 2010/06/18)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SpecificArticle
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CliticElement
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Homophone
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	homophone
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1302
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Word that sounds like another word, but is different in writiing or meaning.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#Relation
	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#LexicalRelation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Ideophone
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-4192
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Ideophones are marked words that depict sensory imagery.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SemanticUnit
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PostNominalModifier
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES, NPFunction="postmodifying", http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1945 (without restriction on nominal heads ?)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Postmodifying is a function of an adjective that can modify, describe, or qualify a preceding noun. (EAGLES) modificationType: Refers to the prenominal or postnominal positions of determiners which distinguish different forms. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1931)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AdnominalConstituent
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubordinatingConjunctionWithFiniteClause
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	For example, in German the subordinating conjunction "weil" introduces a clause with a finite verb. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node19.html#oav2u 17.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubordinatingConjunction
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TransitiveSubject
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#A
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	First argument of a transitive or ditransitive verb. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#A)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SyntacticSubject
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DeficientVerb
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3007
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	This is an ill-defined concept originating from ISOcat. It is however, not possible to circumscribe it in OLiA as it lacks an established concept of deficiency. Despite the unsatisfactory definition, this was thus adopted in OLiA for compatibility with ISOcat, but marked as deprecated.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	verb lacking certain morphosyntactic properties
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Verb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#QuotativeMood
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#Quotative, MTE VForm="quotative" (Estonian)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A quotative is grammatical device to mark reported speech in some languages (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quotative), e.g., in Estonian. ‘Reportedly, while he was going (in his boat), he turned over.’ Ta olevat oma paadiga ümber läinud He was_QUOTATIVE his_own boat_WITH over gone. (Estonian translation of an example given under http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAQuotativeEvidential.htm) (Heiki-Jaan.Kaalep, email 2010/06/22)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MoodFeature
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#QuotativeModality
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AnimateGender
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Animate
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	One of the two grammatical genders, or classes of nouns, the other being inanimate. Membership in the animate grammatical class is largely based on meanings, in that living things, including humans, animals, spirits, trees, and most plants are included in the animate class of nouns (Valentine 2001: 114). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Animate)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#GenderFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Comparative
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES, http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1421
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The comparative is the form of an adjective or adverb which denotes the degree or grade by which a person, thing, or other entity has a property or quality greater or less in extent than that of another. In English the structure of a comparative consists normally of the positive form of the adjective or adverb, plus the suffix -er, or (especially in the case of longer words) the modifier "more" (or "less") before the adjective or adverb. The form is usually completed by "than" and the noun which is being compared, e.g. "he is taller than his father is", or "the village is less picturesque than the town near by is". (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative 17.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#DegreeFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#OpenQuote
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from EMILLE, http://purl.org/olia/emille.owl#OpenQuotationMark
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	quotation mark, opening
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Quote
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ExpletiveArgument
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TüBa-D/Z
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Three different expletive usages [of the German expletive pronoun es] are traditionally distinguished: formal subject or object (expletive argument), correlate of an extraposed clausal argument (expletive correlate), and Vorfeld-es (structural expletive) (cf. (Eisenberg 1999 2001), (Pütz 1986)). ... The formal subject obligatorily occurs with weather verbs, e.g. "Es regnet" and unpersonal or agentless constructions such as "Es gibt so eine Buchung" or "Es geht um populäre Unterhaltung." Some verbs optionally permit an expletive subject but also occur with referential subjects such as "Max/Es kopft an der Tür." A formal object is found in constructions like "jmd. legt es an auf etw." or "jmd. verdirbt es mit jmdm." In all examples mentioned, es functions as a grammatical argument without semantic contribution, i.e. it does not refer to a person, object, or event. (Telljohann et al. 2009, p.60f)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ExpletivePronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Verbal
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#Verbal
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In MULTEXT-East a characteristic of abbreviated verbs (http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#Verbal)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SyntacticFunction
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InterrogativePunctuation
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	interrogative punctuation
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2087
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Punctuation used when the sentence is interrogative. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2087)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MainPunctuation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Human
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#Human
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	For Slavic languages, animacy, and in particular, Humanness, defines so-called "sub-genders" that manifest themselves in the accusative ending of masculine and neuter singular nouns. Humans are by definition animate. (http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#Human)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Animate
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PredicativeMarker
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	predicative marker
	marque predicative
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from Bambara Reference Corpus, http://cormand.huma-num.fr/gloses.html
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	no definition given
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#VerbalParticle
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MentalAbilitiveModality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3313
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	MentalAbilitiveModality indicates that an agent has the capacity to perform some mental action [Bybee, Perkins and Pagliuca 1994: 192; Palmer 2001: 77].
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AbilitativeModality
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SecondFamiliar
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES PersonalPronoun attribute Politeness="Familiar". The EAGLES attribute politeness (polite/ familiar) is limited to second-person pronouns.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In several European languages exist special forms of pronouns for polite or respectful reference, e.g. Dutch u and Spanish usted. The feature SecondFamiliar applies to the corresponding unmarked forms for informal conversiation in such languages. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node18.html#oav1p 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Second
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InitialField
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	In the canonical sentence, the initial field is the first position in the sentence, hence grouped under Fronting.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In a German clause, the finite verb can appear in three different positions: verb-second, verb-initial, and verb-final. Only in verb-final clauses the verb complex consisting of the finite verb and non-finite verbal elements forms a unit. The discontinuous positioning of the verbal elements in verb-first and verb-second clauses is the traditional reason for structuring German clauses into fields. The positions of the verbal elements form the Satzklammer (sentence bracket) which divides the sentence into a Vorfeld (initial field), a Mittelfeld (middle field), and a Nachfeld (final field). The Vorfeld and the Mittelfeld are divided by the linke Satzklammer (left sentence bracket), which is the finite verb, the rechte Satzklammer (right sentence bracket) is the verb complex between the Mittelfeld and the Nachfeld. (Telljohann et al. 2009, p.13)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Fronting
	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#TopologicalField
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FutureInFuture
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/FutureInFuture, classified as absolute-relative tense here.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	FutureInFutureTense locates the situation in question in the future, relative to a temporal reference point that itself is located in the future relative to the moment of utterance. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/FutureInFuture)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AbsoluteRelativeTense
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PastInFuture
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/PastInFuture
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Locates the situation in question in the future, prior to a reference time in the future.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AbsoluteRelativeTense
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ModalityMarkingAdverb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	introduced for http://purl.org/olia/emille.owl#NegativeModalAdverb in the EMILLE tagset (Hardie 2003) for Urdu
	despite the deviating terminology, this seems to be a subconcept of VerbalParticle, and maybe, it corresponds to ModalParticle (but only if the DCR definition is incorrect)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A modality-marking adverb is a verbal particle that serves to indicate mood, aspect and/or tense (cf. Schmidt 1999). Note that this is not to be confused with the conventional meaning of "modal adverb" in the sense of "manner adverb" (cf. http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Category:English_modal_adverbs), hence the uncommon name. Ruth Laila Schmidt (1999) Urdu, an essential grammar, Routledge, London.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adverb
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#VerbalParticle
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TransitiveObject
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#P
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Second argument of a transitive verb, transitive object (P) (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#P)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DirectObject
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InallativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Inallative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	InallativeCase expresses that something is moving toward the region that is inside the referent of the noun it marks. It has the meaning 'towards in(side)'. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Inallative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CloseSquareBracket
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	PTB bracketing guidelines, Santorini 1991
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	] *RSB* Right square bracket (Santorini 1991)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RightParentheticalPunctuation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LetterNumeral
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1937
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Numeral expressed with letters.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Numeral
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#String
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ProcessedRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#processedRole
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The entity that undergoes a Process (Dik, 1997:118). (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#processedRole)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#UndergoerMacroRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FutureInPast
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/FutureInPast, classified as absolute-relative tense here
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	FutureInPastTense locates the situation in question in the future, relative to a contextually determined temporal reference point that itself must be located in the past relative to the moment of utterance. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/FutureInPast)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AbsoluteRelativeTense
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SyntacticComplement
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	according to the PennTreebank definition (Bies et al. 1995), arguments are complements
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The complement is attached inside the VP, NP, ADJP, or PP. Verbs: The term “complement” as it is used here refers to: 1. internal arguments such as NP objects, S and SBAR with no adverbial dash tags (including some if-clauses, as in I wonder if the Cubs are winning), and quoted constituents (including SINV and FRAG) 2. the passive logical-subject by-phrase 3. VP 4. constituents tagged -BNF, -CLR, -DTV, -PRD, and -PUT (S (NP-SBJ-1 the guide) (VP was (VP given (NP *-1) (PP-DTV to (NP Arthur)) (PP by (NP-LGS Ford))))) Nouns: Since it is difficult to consistently annotate an argument/adjunct distinction, all PP modifiers of nouns are Chomsky-adjoined to the NP: (NP (NP a teacher) (PP of (NP chemistry))) Adjectives: Except in comparatives, any modifier following an adjective is bracketed as a complement. (ADJP eager/likely/ready (S to believe anything)) Prepositions: The NP or S complement of a preposition is placed inside the PP. (Bies et al. 1995)
	A complement is a phrase that fits a particular slot in the syntax requirements of a parent phrase (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complement_%28linguistics%29). An additional (morpho)syntactic constituent that may be subcategorized for by the predicate. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#syntacticComplement)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SyntacticRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PositionerRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#positionerRole
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The entity controlling a Position (Dik, 1997:118) (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#positionerRole)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ActorMacroRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DemonstrativeDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Determiner with DetType="Demonstrative".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Demonstratives are deictic expressions (they depend on an external frame of reference) which indicate entities a speaker refers to, and distinguishes those entities from others. Demonstratives are usually employed for spatial deixis (using the context of the physical surroundings), but in many languages they double as discourse deictics, referring not to concrete objects but to words, phrases and propositions mentioned in speech. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demonstrative 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AttributivePronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AbessiveCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Abessive, http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1223
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	AbessiveCase expresses the lack or absence of the referent of the noun it marks. It has the meaning of the English preposition 'without' (Pei and Gaynor 1954: 3,35; Gove, et al. 1966: 3). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Abessive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Headline
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	PTB bracketing guidelines, Bies et al. 1995
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	-HLN (headline) — marks headlines and datelines. Note that headlines and datelines always constitute a unit of text that is structurally independent from the following sentence. (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#DiscourseEntity
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FormalRegister
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	formal register
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1992
	subClassOf register (dcif:conceptualDomain)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Formal register. (12620; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1992)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#RegisterFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#BoundClitic
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	bound
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf cliticness (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1933 (bound as value of cliticness http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1933), originally from MULTEXT-East, see http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#BoundClitic, but note that as it is used in MULTEXT-East, BoundClitic is ambiguous between "being" a bound clitic and "containing a bound clitic". Here, only the first aspect is preserved, is is thus a subclass of CliticElement.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Linked to a particular element. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1933)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CliticElement
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SuperterminativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Superterminative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	SuperterminativeCase expresses the notion of something moving into the region over the referent of the noun it marks, but not through that region. It has the meaning 'into the region over'. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Superterminative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ContrastiveEmphaticParticle
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:18
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from EMILLE, http://purl.org/olia/emille.owl#ContrastiveEmphaticParticle, shorthand for ContrastiveParticle and EmphaticParticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#EmphaticParticle
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasOwnerGender
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#GenderFeature
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	owner gender
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1416
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Indication concerning the gender of the person that ownes something. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1416)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IndefiniteMultiplicativeQuantifier
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3024 (IndefiniteMultiplicativeNumeral)
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A word indicating imprecise number of times something happened.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IndefiniteQuantifier
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#QualitativeVerb
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	qualitative verb
	verbe qualitatif
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from the Bambara Reference Corpus (BRC, http://cormand.huma-num.fr/gloses.html)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	no definition given
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MainVerb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CloseAngleBracket
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	PTB bracketing guidelines, Santorini 1991
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	> *RAB* Right angle bracket (Santorini 1991)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RightParentheticalPunctuation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InterrogativeAdverb
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:19
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Adverb with Wh-Type="Interrogative".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Interrogative adverbs are used to introduce questions, e.g. "When are you coming?" (Angelika Adam)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#WHTypeAdverbs
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MainClause
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	MainClause is the class of clauses that can stand on their own as a full, independent sentence. If a sentence contains any embedded clauses, the main clause is understood as the matrix plus the embedded clauses. In the sentence 'John thinks that Mary is sick', 'John thinks that Mary is sick' is the main clause [Crystal 2001, 231]. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/MainClause) The independent clause can stand by itself as a grammatically viable simple sentence. Multiple independent clauses can be joined (usually with a comma and a coordinating conjunction) to form a compound sentence (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#mainClause with reference to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clause).
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FiniteClause
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IronicRegister
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	ironic register
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf register (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1994
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Register for irony. (12620; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1994)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#RegisterFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MultiplicativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#MultiplicativeCase
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A case used in the Hungarian MULTEXT-East scheme, e.g., tizennegyedszer/tizennegyed, tucatszor/tucat, tízezredszer/tízezred (hu) (http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#MultiplicativeCase)
	The multiplicative case is a grammatical case used for marking a number of something ("three times"). The case is found in the Hungarian language, for example nyolc (eight), nyolcszor (eight times). The case appears also in Finnish as an adverbial (adverb-forming) case. Used with a cardinal number it denotes the number of actions; for example, viisi (five) -> viidesti (five times). Used with adjectives it refers to the mean of the action, corresponding the English suffix -ly: kaunis (beautiful) -> kauniisti (beautifully). It is also used with a small number of nouns: leikki (play) -> leikisti (just kidding, not really). In addition, it acts as an intensifier when used with a swearword: piru -> pirusti. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiplicative_case)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InchoativeAspect
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	inchoative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2002
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Aspect that expresses the beginning of an event or state.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#AspectFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Dual
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	dual
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf grammaticalNumber (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1879
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Form used in some languages to designate two persons or things. (ISO12620; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1879)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#NumberFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Trial
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	trial
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf grammaticalNumber (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1407
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Grammatical number referring to 'three things', as opposed to 'singular' and 'plural'. (en2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_number; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1407)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#NumberFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#EchoWord
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	reduplicative
	echo word
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-4209
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from Ancorra for Indian languages, http://purl.org/olia/ancorra.owl#EchoWord
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The word is a copy of a previous word. In Hindi, this would add the meaning of distribution ("one rupee each"), separation ("sit separately"), variety, diversity or just emphasis. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-4209, reduplicative) Echo word is a linguistic term that refers to a particular kind of reduplication which is a widespread areal feature in the languages of South Asia. Echo words are characterized by reduplication of a complete word or phrase, with the initial segment or syllable of the reduplicant being overwritten by a fixed segment or syllable. In most languages in which this phenomenon is present, echo words serve to express a meaning of "... and such; and things like that." In some cases the echo word may express a depreciative meaning as well. Echo words in Hindi are typically created with a fixed initial v: aam "mango" aam vaam "mangoes and the like" tras "grief" tras vras "grief and the like" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Echo_word)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Reduplication
	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#Word
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ModalParticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	modal particle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf particle (dcif:isA)
	TOCHECK: is this definition correct ? Could it be that ModalParticle actually means "VerbalParticle marking mood" ? (Cf. ModalityMarkingAdverb)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1920
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Particle which functions as a modal. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1920)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Particle
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TitleInRunningText
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	PTB bracketing guidelines, Bies et al. 1995
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	-TTL (title) — is attached to the top node of a title when this title appears inside running text. -TTL implies -NOM. The internal structure of the title is bracketed as usual. (See section 12 [Titles] for more information about the bracketing of titles.) (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#DiscourseEntity
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DeterminalPronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#DeterminalPronoun
	Not to be confused with pronominal determiners
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The Estonian determinal pronouns _ise_, _end(a)_ `(one)self'." combine aspects of emphatic pronouns and reflexive pronouns. It could also be described as an intensifier that is formally identical with the reflexive pronoun or as an emphatic reflexive pronoun. (Ivan A. Derzhanski, Heiki-Jaan Kaalep, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#DeterminalPronoun; Insa Gülzow (2006), The acquisition of intensifiers: Emphatic reflexives in English and German child language, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, p. 258)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PersReflPronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ContallativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Contallative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	ContallativeCase expresses that something is moving toward the vicinity of the referent of the noun it marks. It has the meaning 'towards the vicinity of'. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Contallative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CharacteristicAdjective
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from Dzongkha tagset (Chungku et al. 2010, http://purl.org/olia/dzongkha.owl#CharacteristicAdjective)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	It is an adjective, which expresses the character and feature of subject or an object, while modifying a noun. ང་འ ་ ང ་ འ ག། Shing-di rim du 'The tree is tall' (http://panl10n.net/english/Outputs%20Phase%202/CCs/Bhutan/Papers/2007/0701/PartOfSpeech.pdf)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adjective
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FamilyName
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	introduced as generalization over http://purl.org/olia/ubyPos.owl#nounProperSecondName
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In most European cultures, family names have been introduced into name formulas to identify a person's family, so that individuals with the same given name can be distinguished. (CC)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ProperNoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RelativeClause
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#relativeClause
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A relative clause is a subordinate clause that modifies a noun. For example, the noun phrase [the man who wasn't there] contains the noun [man], which is modified by the relative clause [who wasn't there] (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#relativeClause with reference to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relative_clause and Dik 1997) There are three di erent types of relative clauses in English (be careful not to confuse relative clauses and complement clauses): (i) wh-relative clauses (a guy who(m) I know), (ii) that-relative clauses (a guy that I know), and (iii) zero relative clauses (a guy I know). (Santorini 1991)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubordinateClause
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#OnomatopoeticWord
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	onomatopoetic word
	onomatopée
http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#altLabel	onomatopée
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Bambara Reference Corpus "Onomatopée", http://cormand.huma-num.fr
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	no definition given
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Residual
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ImmediatePast
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/ImmediatePast, classified as Past here
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	ImmediatePastTense locates the situation in question at a time considered very recent in relation to the moment of utterance (Comrie 1985: 87). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/ImmediatePast)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Past
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CosubordinateClause
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#non-embeddedSubordinateClause Termed "cosubordination" here in accordance with van Valin and LaPolla (1997)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CoordinateClause
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PersonalPassive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/PersonalPassive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A Passive in which the argument mapped to Object in a basic structural configuration assumes the Subject relation in a corresponding nonbasic configuration. (Klaiman 1991:23) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/PersonalPassive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PassiveVoice
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SimplePreposition
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	simple preposition
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf preposition (dcif:isA)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1900
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Preposition that is a pure simple word in contrast with the notion of fused preposition. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1900)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Preposition
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PhasalAspect
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#phaseAspect, http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Phasal
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A set of aspectual distinctions involving relations between a background situation (the reference situation) and a situation located relative to the reference situation (the denoted situation). In English, phasal distinctions are expressed by auxiliary-headed constructions, like the inceptive, progressive, and perfect constructions, whose head verbs express the aspectual class of the denoted situation. The aspectual class of the denoted situation differs from that of the reference situation (Michaelis 1998:xv). An event may have a beginning and an end, a middle portion (continuing or changing), and also an ensuing result or an altered state. These are considered to be the various “phases‽ of an event. A speaker may talk about an event from the point of view of any of these individual phases, and his language may have inflectional (or other type of) markers for representing these distinctions. Since such markers indicate distinctions in the temporal structure of an event, we may regard them as belonging to the category of aspect. It has been suggested (Dik 1989: 186) that these may be grouped under a subcategory (or “level") of aspect called “phasal aspect". (Bhat 1999:49) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Phasal)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#AspectFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PossessiveRelativePronoun
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:20
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3005
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	here "Pronoun" seems to refer to attributive pronoun, as the corresponding possessiverelativeDeterminer is not found in ISOcat (substitutive possessive relative pronouns [without accompanying noun] do exist, but are comparably marked, cf. "I remember whose lines these are." vs. "I remember certain lines and whose they are." In this example, the latter is actually an elliptical construction with an elided head noun)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A relative pronoun whose antecedent is the possessor of the subject or object in the relative clause.
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#OtherSourceEvidentiality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3367
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An indication that the source of information is someone other than the speaker. [Aikhenvald 2006: 106]
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#EvidentialityFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Root
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	root
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2231
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	base of a word (MIRACL & LSCA; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2231)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Morpheme
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasEvidentiality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#EvidentialityFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FusedPrepArt
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Adposition with Type="FusedPrepArt"
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The additional value Fused prep-art is for the benefit of those who do not find it practical to split fused words such as French au (= à + le) into two text words. This very common phenomenon of a fused preposition + article in West European languages should preferably, however, be handled by assigning two tags to the same orthographic word (one for the preposition and one for the article). (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node18.html#oav1ap 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Preposition
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Article
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#OldUsage
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	old
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1961
	subClassOf dating (dcif:conceptualDomain)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Used in the past. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1961)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TemporallyDefinedUsage
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ExperiencerRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#experiencerRole, originally a subconcept of UndergoerMacroRole
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An experiencer instantiates the role of an entity (usually animate) who takes the event in through sensory means in some way. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#experiencerRole)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#UndergoerMacroRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SupertranslativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Supertranslative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	SupertranslativeCase expresses the notion of something moving along a trajectory above the referent of the noun it marks. It has the meaning 'along the region over'. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Supertranslative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CloseQuote
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from EMILLE, http://purl.org/olia/emille.owl#CloseQuotationMark
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	quotation mark, closing
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Quote
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ImpersonalPassive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/ImpersonalPassive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A Passive that alters the mapping of a nominal to the Subject relation in a basic intransitive structure (Klaiman 1991:23) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/ImpersonalPassive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PassiveVoice
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PartitiveArticle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TODO: Check relationship with PartitiveDeterminer
	EAGLES Article with Article-Type="Partitive". (optional for French)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A partitive article indicates an indefinite quantity of a mass noun; there is no partitive article in English, though the words some or any often have that function. An example is French du / de la / des, as in Voulez-vous du café? ("Do you want some coffee?" or "Do you want coffee"). (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_(grammar) 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Article
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#OpenParenthesis
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	open parenthesis
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf partOfSpeech (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1442
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Beginning of a pair of parenthesis. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1442)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LeftParentheticalPunctuation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FirstPersonPronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Pronoun with Person="First". As only personal and reflexive pronouns show person differentiation, FirstPersonPronoun is modelled as a subclass of PersReflConcept here.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A FirstPersonPronoun refers to the speaker, or to both the speaker and referents grouped with the speaker. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsFirstPersonDeixis.htm 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PersReflPronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IndicativeVerb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES FiniteVerb with VerbForm="Indicative"
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Indicative mood is used in factual statements. All intentions in speaking that a particular language does not put into another mood use the indicative. It is the most commonly used mood and is found in all languages. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_mood#Indicative_mood 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FiniteVerb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Interjection
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES top-level category Interjection (I).
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An interjection is a form, typically brief, such as one syllable or word, which is used most often as an exclamation or part of an exclamation. It typically expresses an emotional reaction, often with respect to an accompanying sentence and may include a combination of sounds not otherwise found in the language, e.g. in English: psst; ugh; well, well (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAnInterjection.htm 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MorphosyntacticCategory
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CaseMarker
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from Dzongkha tagset (Chungku et al. 2010). If its tradition of grammar description is influenced by the Indian, these case markers are variously described as case morphemes or as postpositions. Therefore introduced as a shorthand for Adposition or MorphologicalParticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:21
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Unique
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Contraction
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Uby POS, undocumented, http://purl.org/olia/ubyPos.owl
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	no definition given
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Residual
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#VoiceParticle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	generalization over EAGLES: http://purl.org/olia/eagles.owl#MediopassiveVoiceParticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	E.g., the mediopassive (middle) voice marker se in the Portuguese EAGLES scheme. (Leech and Wilson 1996)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#VerbalParticle
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PossessorRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in conformance with Stanford Parser Dependency Labels
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Semantic role as used by the Stanford Dependency Parser
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SemanticRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ElativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Elative, http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1276, note that the latter conflates ElativeDegree and ElativeCase
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	ElativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location out of which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'out of' (Lyons 1968: 299; Pei and Gaynor 1954: 64; Crystal 1985: 106; Gove, et al. 1966: 730). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Elative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AblativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Ablative, http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1224
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Case used to indicate locative or instrumental function. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1224) AblativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location from which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'from'. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Ablative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#StructuralExpletive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TüBa-D/Z
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Three different expletive usages [of the German expletive pronoun es] are traditionally distinguished: formal subject or object (expletive argument), correlate of an extraposed clausal argument (expletive correlate), and Vorfeld-es (structural expletive) (cf. (Eisenberg 1999 2001), (Pütz 1986)). (Telljohann et al. 2009, p.60) In German, a purely structural dummy element ... occurs in Vorfeld position only and is not correlated with any argument of the clause. It does not agree with the verb which becomes evident if there is a plural subject in the Mittelfeld: "es zahlen ihn die Völker, deren Menschenrechte angeblich verteidigt werden." It is ungrammatical in the Mittelfeld, e.g. *". . . dass es ihn die Völker zahlen".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ExpletivePronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InfinitiveParticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	infinitive particle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf particle (dcif:isA)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1896, taxonomic organization follows http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#InfinitiveParticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Particle used to express infinitive. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1896)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#VerbalParticle
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RelativeAdjective
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from EMILLE for Urdu, http://purl.org/olia/emille.owl#RelativeAdjective
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Relative adjectives express similarity or a comparison. (Schmidt 1999, p.218, http://purl.org/olia/emille.owl#RelativeAdjective)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adjective
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PostHodiernalFuture
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/PostHodiernalFuture, classified as Future here
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	PostHodiernalFutureTense locates the situation in question after the span that is culturally defined as 'today' (Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca 1994: 247). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/PostHodiernalFuture)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Future
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CardinalNumber
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Numeral with Type="Cardinal".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A cardinal numeral is a numeral of the class whose members are considered basic in form, used in counting, and used in expressing how many objects are referred to. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsACardinalNumeral.htm 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Numeral
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PurposeRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in conformance with PTB bracketing guidelines (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	-PRP (purpose or reason) â ´ marks purpose or reason clauses and PPs. (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SemanticRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ReflexiveMiddle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TODO: Check Siewierska (1988:257)
	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/ReflexiveMiddle, but the definition given there ("Subjects perform action to self") may be oversimplistic as it entails that ReflectiveMiddle is the *same* as Reflexive. In my current understanding, reflexive middle is a middle construction that makes use of grammatical devices that normally indicate reflexivity, cf. the definition of ReflexivePassive. The definition given below is a generalization that covers the original definition as well.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Reflexive middle makes use of grammatical devices that normally indicate reflexivity. (Ch. Chiarcos)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MiddleVoice
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ReflexivePronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES PersReflPronoun with SpecialPronounType="Reflexive".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A reflexive pronoun is a pronoun that has coreference with the subject. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAReflexivePronoun.htm 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PersReflPronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ReciprocalPronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES PersReflPronoun with "Special PronounType"="Reciprocal".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A reciprocal pronoun is a pronoun that expresses a mutual feeling or action among the referents of a plural subject. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAReciprocalPronoun.htm 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PersReflPronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Macron
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	macron
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1327
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Mark placed over a long vowel to mark quantity. (www.southwestern.edu/~carlg/Latin_Web/glossary.html; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1327)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Diacritic
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Conjugated
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	conjugated
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2207
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Property of a verbal form when inflected (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2207)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Inflected
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NonreducedInflection
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#CompoundAdjective
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Nonreduced adjective inflection of Slavic languages, e.g., Czech nejubožejšími/ubohý, nejvyspělejších/vyspělý, nejvyšších/vysoký, nejvznešenějšímu/vznešený, nejvážnějšímu/vážný, nejvýznamnějších/významný, nejvýznamnějšími/významný, nejvýznamnějšímu/významný, největšími/velký (http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#CompoundAdjective)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#StrengthFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubordinatingConjunctionWithNegation
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#NegativeSubordinatingConjunction
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Conjunction/Sub_Type="negative" (Romanian, Serbian, Russian) In Romanian, each conjunction requires another mood, so that the diversity may be controlled by subcategorisation rules. The attribute Sub_Type distinguishes among the positive and negative conjunctions, providing means to control verbal double negation, (as in case of the negative pronouns, determiners and adverbs): nici NU am venit, nimeni NU vorbeşte, nici_un tren N-a trecut, nicăieri N-am văzut (MTE v4, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#NegativeSubordinatingConjunction)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubordinatingConjunction
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InfinitiveVerbPhrase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Ancorra, http://purl.org/olia/ancorra.owl#InfiniteVerbChunk
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	VGINF Infinitival Verb Chunk This tag is to mark the infinitival verb form. In Hindi, both, gerunds and infinitive forms of the verb end with a -nA suffix. Since both behave functionally in a similar manner, the distinction is not very clear. However, languages such as Bangla etc have two different forms for the two types. Examples from Bangla are given below. b8. Borabela ((snAna karA))_VGNN SorIrera pokze BAlo 'Morning' 'bath' 'do-verbal noun' 'health-gen' 'for' 'good' ‘Taking bath in the early morning is good for health” b9. bindu Borabela ((snAna karawe))_VGINF BAlobAse 'Bindu' 'morning' 'bath' 'take-inf' 'love-3pr' “Bindu likes to take bath in the early morning” In Bangla, the gerund form takes the suffix –A / -Ano, while the infinitive marker is –we. The syntactic distribution of these two forms of verbs is different. For example, the gerund form is allowed in the context of the word darakAra “necessary” while the infinitive form is not, as exemplified below: b10 Borabela ((snAna karA))_VGNN darakAra 'Morning' 'bath' 'do-verbal noun' 'necessary' “It is necessary to take bath in the early morning” b11. *Borabela ((snAna karawe))_VGINF darakAra Based on the above evidence from Bangla, the tag VGINF has been included to mark a verb chunk. (Akshar Bharati, Dipti Misra Sharma, Lakshmi Bai, Rajeev Sangal (2006), AnnCorra : Annotating Corpora. Guidelines For POS And Chunk Annotation For Indian Languages, Tech. Rep., L anguage Technologies Research Centre IIIT, Hyderabad, version of 15-12-2006, http://ltrc.iiit.ac.in/tr031/posguidelines.pdf)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NonfiniteVerbPhrase
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PartitiveCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TDS ontology; http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Partitive; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2003
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The partitive case is a grammatical case which denotes "partialness", "without result", or "without specific identity". (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#partitiveCase with reference to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partitive) PartitiveCase expresses the partial nature of the referent of the noun it marks, as opposed to expressing the whole unit or class of which the referent is a part. This case may be found in items such as the following: existential clauses, nouns that are accompanied by numerals or units of measure, or predications of material from which something is made. It often has a meaning similar to the English word 'some' (Pei and Gaynor 1954: 161; Richards, Platt, and Weber 1985: 208; Quirk, et al. 1985: 249; Gove, et al. 1966: 1648; Sebeok 1946: 1214). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Partitive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AdjectivalModifier
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#adjectivalModifier
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A nominal is modified by an adjective. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#adjectivalModifier)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AdnominalConstituent
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#BenefactiveCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Benefactive; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1247
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	BenefactiveCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks receives the benefit of the situation expressed by the clause (Crystal 1980: 43; Gove, et al. 1966: 203). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Benefactive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DirectWHQuestion
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Santorini 1991, Bies et al. 1995
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	SBARQ|Direct question introduced by a wh-word or wh-phrase. See Section 5.32. Indirect questions and relative clauses should be bracketed as SBAR, not SBARQ. (Santorini 1991) Wh-questions should be bracketed as SBARQ. The wh-constituent (whether it is a subject or not) is a child of SBARQ; the rest of the question is an SQ. If the wh-constituent is a subject or an object, the position where it is interpreted should be represented by the empty element T. (Santorini 1991) The SBARQ label marks wh-questions (i.e., those that contain a gap and therefore require a trace). A further level of structure, SQ, contains the inverted auxiliary (if there is one) and the rest of the sentence. The inverted auxiliary in wh-questions is not labeled. ... SBARQ â ´ Direct question introduced by a wh-word or wh-phrase. See section 1 [Overview of Basic Clause Structure]. Indirect questions and relative clauses should be bracketed as SBAR, not SBARQ. (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DirectQuestion
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PrepositionalCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Prepositional case is an in EAGLES optional value of CaseFeature for Spanish pronouns and determiners. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node19.html#oav2v 15.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In many grammars, the term "prepositional case" is to refer to case marking that only occurs in combination with prepositions. Normally, this is an oblique case, e.g., the Russian 6th case, also referred to as "locative". (Ch. Chiarcos)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InclusiveEmphaticParticle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from EMILLE for Urdu, http://purl.org/olia/emille.owl#InclusiveEmphaticParticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In Urdu, bhî is an emphatic particle meaning 'even'. In opposition to contrastive tô and exclusive hî, bhî is inclusive: maim *bhî* faisalâ karûm gâ "I'll *also* make a decision" maim *hî* faisalâ karûm gâ "*I'm the one who* will make the decision." (Schmidt 1999, p.237, http://purl.org/olia/emille.owl#InclusiveEmphaticParticle)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Inclusive
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#EmphaticParticle
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ExclusiveEmphaticParticle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from EMILLE for Urdu, http://purl.org/olia/emille.owl#ExclusiveEmphaticParticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In Urdu, the exclusive emphatic particle hî emphasizes the preceding word and excludes something else (which may not be expressed). (Schmidt 1999, p.233, http://purl.org/olia/emille.owl#ExclusiveEmphaticParticle) Compare with the inclusive emphatic particle bhî: maim *bhî* faisalâ karûm gâ "I'll *also* make a decision" maim *hî* faisalâ karûm gâ "*I'm the one who* will make the decision." (Schmidt 1999, p.237, http://purl.org/olia/emille.owl#InclusiveEmphaticParticle)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#EmphaticParticle
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Exclusive
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ComitativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Comitative; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1255
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	ComitativeCase expresses accompaniment. It carries the meaning 'with' or 'accompanied by' (Anderson, Stephen 1985: 186; Pei and Gaynor 1954: 42;Dixon, R. 1972: 12; Gove, et al. 1966: 455). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Comitative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Proximal
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in accordance with http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#CliticProximalDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The referent denoted by a distal demonstrative pronoun (e.g., English that) is usually spatially more remote or discoursally less salient as compared to a referent denoted by a proximal demonstrative pronoun (e.g., English this) (Chiarcos)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ProximityFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adjectival
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#Adjectival
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In MULTEXT-East a characteristic of attributive pronouns and abbreviated adjectives, e.g., in Ukrainian e.g., абичий/= бозна-чий/= будь-чий/= дечий/= хтозна-чий/= чий-будь/= чий-небудь/= чийсь/=, абичийого/абичий аби до чийого/абичий бозна-чийого/бозна-чий будь-чийого/будь-чий дечийого/дечий хтозна-чийого/хтозна-чий чийого-будь/чий-будь чийого-небудь/чий-небудь чийогось/чийсь, абичийого/абичий бозна-чийого/бозна-чий будь-чийого/будь-чий дечийого/дечий хтозна-чийого/хтозна-чий чийого-будь/чий-будь чийого-небудь/чий-небудь чийогось/чийсь, абичийому/абичий абичиєму/абичий абичиїм/абичий аби на чийому/абичий аби на чиєму/абичий аби на чиїм/абичий бозна на чийому/бозна-чий бозна на чиєму/бозна-чий бозна на чиїм/бозна-чий будь-чийому/будь-чий будь-чиєму/будь-чий будь-чиїм/будь-чий будь на чийому/будь-чий будь на чиєму/будь-чий будь на чиїм/будь-чий дечийому/дечий дечиєму/дечий дечиїм/дечий де на чийому/дечий де на чиєму/дечий, абичийому/абичий абичиєму/абичий бозна-чийому/бозна-чий бозна-чиєму/бозна-чий будь-чийому/будь-чий будь-чиєму/будь-чий дечийому/дечий дечиєму/дечий хтозна-чийому/хтозна-чий хтозна-чиєму/хтозна-чий чийому-будь/чий-будь чиєму-будь/чий-будь чийому-небудь/чий-небудь чиєму-небудь/чий-небудь чийомусь/чийсь чиємусь/чийсь, абичийому/абичий абичиєму/абичий бозна-чийому/бозна-чий будь-чийому/будь-чий будь-чиєму/будь-чий дечийому/дечий хтозна-чийому/хтозна-чий чийому-будь/чий-будь чийому-небудь/чий-небудь чийомусь/чийсь, абичию/абичий бозна-чию/бозна-чий будь-чию/будь-чий дечию/дечий хтозна-чию/хтозна-чий чию-будь/чий-будь чию-небудь/чий-небудь чиюсь/чийсь, абичия/абичий бозна-чия/бозна-чий будь-чия/будь-чий дечия/дечий хтозна-чия/хтозна-чий чия-будь/чий-будь чия-небудь/чий-небудь чиясь/чийсь, абичиє/абичий бозна-чиє/бозна-чий будь-чиє/будь-чий дечиє/дечий хтозна-чиє/хтозна-чий чиє-будь/чий-будь чиє-небудь/чий-небудь чиєсь/чийсь (http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#Adjectival)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SyntacticFunction
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#WithFinite
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES, reimplemented within SubordinatingConjunction taxonomy
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	For example, in German the subordinating conjunction "weil" introduces a clause with a finite verb. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node19.html#oav2u 17.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SubordTypeFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FocusMarker
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-4196
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	In compliance with ISOcat, this is defined here as a morpheme. However, focus markers can be independent words, as well.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	a morpheme indicating that the element it marks is the focus of the utterance.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Morpheme
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DynamicAspect
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#dynamicityAspect
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	dynamic aspect (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#dynamicityAspect)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#AspectFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SuballativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Suballative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	SuballativeCase expresses that something is moving toward the region that is under the referent of the noun it marks. It has the meaning 'towards the region that is under'. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Suballative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ConditionalClause
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#conditionalClause
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Conditional clauses refer to a hypothetical situation, in English they are introduced by 'if' or 'unless'. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#conditionalClause)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubordinateClause
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#HortativeModality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	hortative force
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/HortatoryForce
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A term sometimes used in the grammatical analysis of verbs, to refer to a type of modal meaning in which an exhortation is made. An example of a hortative usage ('a hortative') is the 'let us' construction in English ('let us pray'). [Crystal 2008: 232] (http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/HortatoryForce)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ActionalModality
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PurposiveAspect
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adapted from ILPOSTS (for Indian languages), http://purl.org/olia/ilposts.owl#PurposiveAspect
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The purposive aspect appears to add the notion of intention or probability, both negative and positive. (Steckley, 2007, p. 14, about Huron) (John Steckley, 2007, Words of the Huron, Wilfrid Laurier Univ. Press)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#AspectFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SimpleCoordinatingConjunction
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#SimpleCoordinatingConjunction
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In the Romanian MTE v4 specs, Conjunction/Coord_Type="simple" is defined in contrast to repetitive and correlative coordinating conjunctions. In Romanian, there are three kinds of conjunctions depending on their usage: as such or together with other conjunctions or adverbs: (1) simple, between conjuncts: Ion ori Maria (John or Mary); (2) repetitive, before each conjunct: fie Ion fie Maria fie... (either John or Mary or...) (3) correlative, before a conjoined phrase, it requires specific coordinators between conjuncts: atât mama cât şi tata (both mother and father). (MTE v4), e.g., aşa_că, va_să_zică (ro) (http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#SimpleCoordinatingConjunction)
	Simple applies to the regular type of coordinator occurring between conjuncts: German und, for example. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node18.html#oav1av 17.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CoordinatingConjunction
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ReferentialVoice
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/ReferentialVoice, classified as Antipassive here in analogy with ObliquePassive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	entails assignment of the absolutive to certain kinds of arguments other than the logical subjects (A) and objects (P), including the dative, benefactive, malefactive, and possessor. (Klaiman 1991:239) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/ReferentialVoice)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Antipassive
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PresentParticipleAdjective
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	present participle adjective
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf participleAdjective (dcif:isA)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1597
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Adjective based on a present participle. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1597)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ParticipleAdjective
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PresentParticiple
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AditiveCase
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	aditive case
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TODO: rename to AdditiveCase
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1229
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Case expressing "to" in Basque studies. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1229)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSubjectNumber
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#NumberFeature
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	subject number
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#domain	_:22
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	introduced for double agreement of transitive verbs, e.g., in Hungarian, see http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#FirstSgSecondSg
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Number of the subject of a transitive verb. (By default, this is the meaning of hasNumber).
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasNumber
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AllusivePronoun
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	allusive pronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2223
	subClassOf pronoun (dcif:isA)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	pronoun that have reference to something characterized by allusions. (MIRACL & LSCA; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2223) an invariable pronoun expressing a specific intention by means of unclear term (Khemakhem Aida, 2010-05-10 via isocat-morpho@loria.fr) examples from Arabic (Monica Monachini 2010-05-06 via isocat-morpho@loria.fr): "kam nahaituhu" (how often I forbade him, Hans Wehr), "baas Saar `amra `ashr isniin, gam (= kam) yriid paysikil" (He just turned ten, and here [how] he wants a bicycle, Georgetown University Iraqi Arabic-English Dictionary), "gam (= kam) yurguS imnil-faraH" ([how] he jumped for joy, Georgetown University Iraqi Arabic-English Dictionary)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Pronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FirstInclusive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/FirstInclusive, modelled here as subconcept of First
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Refers to the speaker, hearer(s) and possibly others. Contrasts with FirstPersonExclusive (Crystal 1997: 285). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/FirstInclusive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Inclusive
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#First
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NegativeAdverb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	to be modelled as SemanticRole (cf. CausalAdverb) ?
	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#NegativeAdverb
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Adverb/Type="negative" are used in the Serbian and Romanian MTE v4 specs, e.g., for Romanian nicăieri - nowhere, niciodată - never. (MTE v4) (http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#NegativeAdverb)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adverb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#HesternalPast
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/HesternalPast, classified as Past here
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	HesternalPastTense locates the situation in question somewhere in the span beginning with the period defined culturally as 'yesterday' and extends back through some period that is considered nonremote (Comrie 1985:87-88; Dahl 1985:126). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/HesternalPast)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Past
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Paucal
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	paucal
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf grammaticalNumber (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	TODO: rename to PaucalNumber, because of the existence of PaucalQuantifier in MULTEXT-East
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1350
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Number that specifies 'a few' things. (en2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paucal_number; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1350)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#NumberFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InablativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Inablative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	InablativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location from within which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'from within'. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Inablative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LocationAdverb
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:23
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	ILPOSTS, http://purl.org/olia/ilposts.owl#LocationAdverb DEPRECATED: equivalent to Adverb and hasSemanticRole some LocationRole
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adverb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NegativeParticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	negative particle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1894
	subClassOf particle (dcif:isA)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Particle used to express negation. (Gil Francopoulo; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1894)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Particle
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#EssiveCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Essive, http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1281
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	EssiveCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location at which another referent exists (Lyons 1968: 299,301; Gove, et al. 1966: 778; Crystal 1985: 112; Blake 1994: 154-5). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Essive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Composition
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from Ancorra, http://purl.org/olia/ancorra.owl#Compound
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In linguistics, a compound is a lexeme (less precisely, a word) that consists of more than one stem. Compounding or composition is the word formation that creates compound lexemes (the other word-formation process being derivation). Compounding or Word-compounding refers to the faculty and device of language to form new words by combining or putting together old words. In other words, compound, compounding or word-compounding occurs when a person attaches two or more words together to make them one word. The meanings of the words interrelate in such a way that a new meaning comes out which is very different from the meanings of the words in isolation. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compound_%28linguistics%29)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MorphologicalProcess
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NumeralBoth
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1938
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	The ISOcat definition entails that this just represents the value of "2". I guess, this is not true, but that this Numeral is actually a DualQuantifier (and should be renamed as such), otherwise, it should be eliminated
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Numeric value for two.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Numeral
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NominalNumber
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from Dzongkha tagset (Chunkgu et al. 2010, http://purl.org/olia/dzongkha.owl#NominalNumber)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Nominal numbers are used to identify or refer the things. It does not show the quantity or rank. Example: ངེ་གི་ འགལ་འཕིན་ ཨང་གངས་ འདི་ ༡༧༦༤༩༠༣༧ ཨིན། NGIGI DRUELTHRIN ANGDRANG 'DI 17649037 INN my mobile number is 17649037 be “ My mobile number is 17649037.” (Jurmey Rabgay, email Sep 20, 2010, http://purl.org/olia/dzongkha.owl#NominalNumber)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Numeral
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FullDefiniteArticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	full article
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1928
	DCR: "full article" in dcif:conceptualDomain definiteness, remodelled as a property of DefiniteArticles here
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	For definiteness, when a specific form is the syntactic subject of the clause. (DFKI; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1928)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DefiniteArticle
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PluperfectTense
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/PastInPast, classified as absolute-relative tense here.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	PastInPast tense locates the situation in question prior to a reference time in the past. Also known as PluperfectTense. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/PastInPast)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AbsoluteRelativeTense
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#UnitNoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from Sajjad (2007), http://purl.org/olia/urdu.owl#MeasuringUnit, TOCHECK: are units in Urdu Nouns ?
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Measuring units are frequently used with numerals. However, they have a different syntactic structure than numerals (Sajjad 2007). In European languages, Units are generally expressed as nouns, e.g., English "ten/Numeral kilogram/Unit". "Kilogram" can also be used as a common noun: "The kilogram is losing weight" (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12276822) Hassan Sajjad (2007), Urdu Part of Speech Tagset, version 1.0.0.0, 07-12-2007, Center for research in Urdu Language Processing. National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan, http://www.crulp.org/Downloads/langproc/UrduPOStagger/UrduPOStagset.pdf
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CommonNoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#HonorificCommonNoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from Dzongkha tagset (Chungku et al. 2010)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Dzongkha uses honorific forms: ན་བཟའ་/nam za/ (cloths) is the honorific form of the noun གོ་ ལ་/gola/(cloths), གསངས་/sung/(tell) the honorific form of the verb སབ་/lab/(tell). We opted to mark them by adding the tag NNH (honorific common noun) and VBH (honorific verb) to enable future research on this specific usage of Dzongkha language. A number of tags were added to the set, of which we describe four in more detail: two of the additional tags are subclasses of verbs: VBH (honorific verb form), and VBN which describes past participle forms, like, e.g. བངམ་/jun/(created), the past particle form of བང་/jung/(create). (Chungku et al. 2010) A noun, which indicates respect for the person being addressed, e.g., Miwang Gel-poi Yab “A king's father” [Though father=Apa, but colloquially we say YAB in Dzongkha] (http://panl10n.net/english/Outputs%20Phase%202/CCs/Bhutan/Papers/2007/0701/PartOfSpeech.pdf)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CommonNoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Perfect
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Perfect
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1351, modelled as an absolute tense here
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A verb tense that refers to completed action in the past. It corresponds to three English tenses. (www.southwestern.edu/~carlg/Latin_Web/glossary.html; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1351)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AbsoluteTense
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NamedEntity
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	named entity
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2275
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	segment of text for which one or many rigid designators stands for the referent (Gil Francopoulo; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2275)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#DiscourseEntity
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NecessitativePassive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/NecessitativePassive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A passive in Irish in which the preposition "with" is used, and a semantic meaning of necessity is added. (Noonan 1994:280) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/NecessitativePassive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PassiveVoice
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#EmbeddedInfinitive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	infinitival clause
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#withInfinitiveAsHead, http://purl.org/olia/tcodex.owl#InfinitivalClause
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An infinitive is the head of the embedded construction. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#withInfinitiveAsHead) Infinitival relatives. See section 14 [Infinitives] for more information. (NP (NP a movie) (SBAR (WHNP-1 0) (S (NP-SBJ *) (VP to (VP see (NP *T*-1)))))) (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NonFiniteEmbeddedConstruction
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Neuter
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES, http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#neuterGender
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Neuter gender is a grammatical gender that includes those nouns, articles, pronouns, etc. having referents which do not have distinctions of sex, and often includes some which do have a natural sex distinction. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/glossaryoflinguisticterms/WhatIsNeuterGender.htm 17.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#GenderFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#WeakInflection
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	German adjectives take the endings of the weak inflection when a determiner expresses number, gender and case. The weak adjective inflection has only two endings: –e and –en. (http://www.canoo.net/services/OnlineGrammar/Wort/Adjektiv/Deklinationstyp/Schwach.html 20.11.06) In other Germanic languages, similar systems exist. Weak inflection is a characteristic of lexemes, not individual tokens.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#InflectionTypeFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Ellipsis
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in conformance with PTB bracketing guidelines (Santorini 1991, Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	*?* â ´ placeholder for ellipsed material ... *?* is now available in the following great-tasting flavors: (VP *?*), (ADJP-PRD *?*), (PP-PRD *), (NP *?*), (S *?*), (SBAR *?*). These act as placeholders for a missing predicate or piece thereof, especially in comparative constructions and other environments where predicate deletion occurs. Although the missing material represented by *?* is often identical to another constituent in the same sentence, the two are never coindexed. Postmodifiers of the verb (including traces) may be attached under (VP *?*), but not to any other null element, including the other *?* null elements and (VP *T*). Note that policy for *?* was never finalized, so its use varies to some extent. In general, *?* is used by the annotators as a last resort (short of the FRAG analysis) for the annotation of clauses with â ¼missingâ ½ material. Nonetheless, there are certain constructions that are particularly likely to contain *?*: (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#NullElement
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Apocope
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	apocope
	apocopate
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2254
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	deletion of the final element in a word (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2254)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#PhonologicalProcess
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Definite
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES, http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#definite, http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2004
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Value referring to the capacity of identification of an entity. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2004) An entity is specified as definite when it refers to a particularized individual of the species denoted by the noun. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#definite) Definite noun phrases are used to refer to entities which are specific and identifiable in a given context. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definiteness 20.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#DefinitenessFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#VegetableGender
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3541
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Vegetable gender refers to inanimates and exists in some four-way gender systems, e.g., masculine, feminine, neuter, and vegetable as in Bininj Gun-wok [Evans 2003: 202].
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InanimateGender
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#WHCleft
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	PTB bracketing guidelines (Santorini 1991, Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Wh-clefts are constructions in which a wh-clause functions as the subject of a sentence. A simple example is What matters is the price. Here, the wh-clause What matters is the subject, and is the price is the predicate. The internal structure of the subject is: (NP (SBAR (WHNP what) (S (NP T) (VP matters)))) (Santorini 1991)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubordinateClause
	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SyntacticConstruction
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Augmentative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3094 (augmentativeSize)
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	modelled as a derivational process analoguously to Diminuitive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A special form of a noun that signals that the object being referred to is large relative to the usual size of such an object [Crystal 1980: 34].
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Derivation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Ditransitive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	SUSANNE (Sampson 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A predicate/verb that takes two arguments, e.g., English "to give", cf. van Valin and Lapolla (1997).
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ValencyFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AdjectivalAdverb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#AdjectivalAdverb
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An adjectival adverb is an adverb that is formally identical to an adjective. MULTEXT-East Adverb/Type="adjectival" (Serbian, Macedonian, Bulgarian) Bulgarian AdjectivalAdverbs have the same form as adjectives in Gender = neuter, Person = 3, Number = singular. (MTE v4, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#AdjectivalAdverb)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adverb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PresumptiveMood
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from ILPOSTS (http://purl.org/olia/ilposts.owl#PresumptiveMood) for Indian languages
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The presumptive mood is used in Romanian to express presupposition or hypothesis regarding the fact denoted by the verb, as well as other more or less similar attitudes: doubt, curiosity, concern, condition, indifference, inevitability. For example, acolo s-o fi dus "he might have gone there" shows the basic presupposition use, while the following excerpt from a poem by Eminescu shows the use both in a conditional clause de-o fi "suppose it is" and in a main clause showing an attitude of submission to fate le-om duce "we would bear". De-o fi una, de-o fi alta... Ce e scris și pentru noi, Bucuroși le-om duce toate, de e pace, de-i război. Be it one, be it the other... Whatever fate we have, We will gladly go through all, be it peace or be it war (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irrealis_mood#Presumptive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MoodFeature
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PresumptiveModality
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PossessedCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Possessed
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	PossessedCase is used to mark the noun whose referent is possessed by the referent of another noun. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Possessed)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasOwnerPerson
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#PersonFeature
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	owner person
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1929
	does not entail hasPerson: hasPerson pertains to agreement
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Indication concerning the person that ownes something. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1929)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CloseCurlyBracket
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	close curly bracket
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2085
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Punctuation that is graphically represented by } (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2085)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RightParentheticalPunctuation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IrrealisMood
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#irrealisModality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Irrealis modality indicates the situation to which it pertains is non-actual or non-factual. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#irrealisModality)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MoodFeature
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IrrealisModality
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CausativeVoice
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3847
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	voice where the subject causes someone or something else to do or be something
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#VoiceFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PossessionMarker
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	introduced for Urdu wala, as used in the tagset by Sajjad (2007, http://purl.org/olia/urdu.owl#Wala)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In Urdu, wālā can be added to substantives to derive nouns implying possession or general relationships, e.g., go-wāl, or go-wālā, s.m. cow-keeper, cow-herd (from go, 'cow'), or ghar-wālā, s.m. master or owner of the house (from ghar, 'house') (Plats 1884, cf. http://purl.org/olia/urdu.owl#Wala)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Unique
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#HangingTopic
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	hanging topic
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/tcodex.owl#HangingTopic
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	HangingTopic constructions are closely related to LeftDislocation. Unlike LeftDislocation, the dislocated element and its resuming pronoun do not necessarily agree in case, number and gender. (Petrova and Odebrecht 2011, http://purl.org/olia/tcodex.owl#HangingTopic)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Fronting
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FamiliarSecondPersonPronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES PersonalPronoun with Politeness="Familiar". The EAGLES attribute politeness (polite/ familiar) is limited to second-person pronouns.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In several European languages exist special forms of pronouns for polite or respectful reference, e.g. Dutch u and Spanish usted. The concept FamiliarSecondPersonPronoun applies to the corresponding unmarked forms for informal conversiation in such languages. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node18.html#oav1p 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SecondPersonPronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#BenchLevelRegister
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	shop term
	bench-level register
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf register (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1989
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Register of terms used in applications-oriented as opposed to theoretical or academic levels of language. (ISO12620; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1989)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#RegisterFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IntransitiveSubject
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#S
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Intransitive argument (S), single argument of an intransitive verb or only argument in a one-place predicate (frame). (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#S)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SyntacticSubject
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NotTemporallyAnchored
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	A replacement for TDS Habitual that is modelled here as an Aspect: Habitual tense pertains to verbs which refer to an action that occurs repeatedly. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#habitualTense)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	To be used for actions that are not bound to a particular reference point.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#TenseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Apposition
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in accordance with TIGER, definition according to PTB Bracketing Guidelines (Santorini 1991)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Apposition is a relation between two phrases: (1) the nucleus phrase and (2) an appositive phrase, generally set o by punctuation, which modi es the nucleus phrase. An example of apposition is given in (@11). (11) Ryukichi Imai, Japan’s ambassador to Mexico, agrees that Mexico may be too eager. Here, Ryukichi Imai is the nucleus phrase, and the phrase enclosed in commas, Japan’s ambassador to Mexico, is the appositive. Instances of apposition should be represented as adjunction structures (see Section 3.1). (Santorini 1991)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adjunction
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Causative
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Causative, cf. Anticausative
	TODO: rename to CausativeVoice
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Expressing the causation of an action. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Causative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ActiveVoice
https://mtp.linked.solutions/
http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/topic	https://mtp.linked.solutions/olia
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PromotionalInverseVoice
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/PromotionalInverse
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Involves promotion of the topical proximate-patient to subjecthood. (Givon 1994:24) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/PromotionalInverse)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InverseVoice
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FiniteVerbPhrase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TüBa-D/Z
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#VerbPhrase
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RarelyUsed
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	rarely used
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1986
	subClassOf frequency (dcif:conceptualDomain)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Said of a term that is almost never used. (ISO12620; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1986)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Possible
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ComplementizerField
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The C-Feld occurs in verb-final clauses in German (exception: the conjunction als in subordinated sentences of comparison als w¨are es nie geschehen.). It is obligatorily occupied in finite verb-final clauses if there is no conjunction in the Linke Klammer. In non-finite verb-final clauses the C-position may be empty. This field can be occupied by conjunctions of sentential objects (e.g. daß, ob) or sentence initial conjunctions like um, obwohl, wenn and also by complex interrogative or relative phrases, e.g. ..., ’um wieviel Geld’ geht es dabei? / ..., ’an der’ Max Daniel Professor f¨ur Klavier ist. (Telljohann et al. 2009, p.17)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#TopologicalField
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ConditionRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/tcodex.owl#ConditionalAdverb
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Adverbial that denotes a condition. (Petrova and Odebrecht 2011)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SemanticRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InitialCoordinatingConjunction
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	When two distinct words occur, as in German "weder...noch...", then the first is given the Initial value. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node18.html#oav1av 17.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CoordinatingConjunction
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ItCleft
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	PTB bracketing guidelines (Santorini 1991, Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	-CLF (cleft) — marks it-clefts (“true” clefts) and may be added to the labels S, SINV, or SQ. See section 16 [Clefts]. (SQ-CLF Was (NP-SBJ it) (NP-PRD (NP John's) car) (SBAR (WHNP-6 0) (S (NP-SBJ you) (VP borrowed (NP *T*-6)))) ?) (Bies et al. 1995) S-CLF (it-cleft or “true” cleft) Declarative it-clefts are labeled S-CLF, expletive it is tagged as the surface subject (-SBJ), the SBAR is attached at VP-level, and a trace is coindexed to the wh-complementizer of the clefted portion. (See section 16 [Clefts] for more information.) (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SyntacticConstruction
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#GeneralizationWord
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3033
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A word that does not carry its own meaning but generalizes the meaning of a neighboring word, adding the "etc." sense.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Residual
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Foreign
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	mot etranger
	foreign word
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Category Residuals with Type="ForeignWord".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A foreign word is a text word which lies outside the traditionally accepted range of grammatical classes, it occurs quite commonly in many texts and very commonly in some. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node16.html#mr 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Residual
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InvertedComma
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	inverted comma
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf partOfSpeech (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1443, used as left-parenthetical punctuation in German single quotes
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Inverted comma. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1443)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LeftParentheticalPunctuation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Comma
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	comma
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf partOfSpeech (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1448
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Mark (,) used in writing to show a short pause or to separate items in a list. (Longman DCE 2005; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1448)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SentenceMedialPunctuation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PastParticipleAdjective
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	past participle adjective
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1596
	subClassOf participleAdjective (dcif:isA)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Adjective based on a past participle. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1596)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ParticipleAdjective
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PastParticiple
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DeterminerPhrase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TüBa-D/Z, NOTE: not to be confused with "determiner phrase" in generative grammar, which would be a NounPhrase in most annotation frameworks
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Certain pronouns serving as determiners in noun phrases may be premodified, for instance, by degree adverbs such as in German "so viele ¨Altere", "gar kein Schutz", etc. In the case of "so viele Ältere", the premodifying adverb so is attached to the indefinite pronoun viele. Together, they form a determiner phrase (DP), which is attached to the head noun Ältere on the same level: [so viele] Ältere (Telljohann et al. 2009, p.63)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Phrase
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ImpersonalVerb
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Impersonal
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1306
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	(of a verb) having no logical subject. Usually in English the pronoun it is used in such cases as a grammatical subject, as for example in It is raining. (of a pronoun) not denoting a person (www.wordreference.com/English/definition.asp?en=impersonal; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1306)
	An impersonal verb is a verb that - occurs only in third person singular forms - has no specified agent , and - has a dummy subject or no subject. (www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAnImpersonalVerb.htm; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1306)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MainVerb
	_:24
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AdjectivalParticle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from the EMILLE Urdu tagset (Hardie 2003, http://purl.org/olia/emille.owl#AdjectivalParticle)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Particle that serves to form adjective phrases, e.g., Urdu sā (http://purl.org/olia/emille.owl#AdjectivalParticle)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Particle
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PointOfViewAspect
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#viewPointAspect
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	point of view aspect (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#viewPointAspect)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#AspectFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ZeroComplementizer
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in conformance with PTB bracketing guidelines (Santorini 1991)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	0|Zero represents a zero complementizer (= subordinating conjunction); it may need to be deleted. The zero complementizer is generally the counterpart of the overt complementizer that. Example: Iâ ¹m sure 0 heâ ¹ll be here any minute. ... 0 stands in for overt subordinating conjunctions like that in tensed subordinate clauses, including relative clauses. So the relative clause the man I saw should be bracketed as follows: (NP (NP the man) (SBAR 0 (S (NP I) (VP saw) (NP T))))) (Santorini 1991)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubordinatingConjunction
	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#NullElement
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IntensiveNoun
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3859
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:25
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	deprecated, as merely a shorthand for CommonNoun and hasEmphasis some Emphatic
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	noun that emphasizes another noun
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CommonNoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AdjutativeVoice
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3844
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	voice for a construction where the subject of the verb is not an agent of the action denoted by the verb but is assisting an unstated agent in performing the action
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#VoiceFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#QuotativeVerb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#Quotative, MTE VForm="quotative" (Estonian)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A quotative is grammatical device to mark reported speech in some languages (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quotative), e.g., in Estonian. ‘Reportedly, while he was going (in his boat), he turned over.’ Ta olevat oma paadiga ümber läinud He was_QUOTATIVE his_own boat_WITH over gone. (Estonian translation of an example given under http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAQuotativeEvidential.htm) (Heiki-Jaan Kaalep, email 2010/06/22)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MoodFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RelevanceAspect
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#relevanceAspect
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	relevance aspect (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#relevanceAspect)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#AspectFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InterlativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Interlative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	InterlativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location between which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'to the middle of'. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Interlative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AdessiveCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Adessive, http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1228
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	AdessiveCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location near/at which another referent exists. It has the meaning of 'at' or 'near' (Crystal 1997: 8). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Adessive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CoordinationParticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	coordination particle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2227
	subClassOf particle (dcif:isA)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	particle for coordination (MIRACL & LSCA; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2227)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Particle
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CoordinatingConjunction
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#OnceNoun
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3853
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	onceNoun [DC-3853] ``noun conveying the meaning that the action is performed once''. Clearly, this noun carries a meaning that is closely related to aspect information (e.g., SemelfactiveAspect), but as aspect is a verb-centered concept, it would have been counter-intuitive to model this as Noun and hasAspect some SemelfactiveAspect. Hence, this concept is directly adopted in the OLiA Reference Model, but marked as deprecated until an ontologically satisfying modeling of aspect-related features of nouns has been achieved.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	noun conveying the meaning that the action is performed once
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CommonNoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Nominalization
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TODO: compare against Lehmann, Handbuch Relativsätze
	Nominalization is the process of forming a noun from (mostly) a verbal form, often marked morphologically or via zero derivation. (Hasmik Sargsian and Christian Chiarcos)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Derivation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FuturePerfect
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/RelativeFuture, http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1292
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	RelativeFutureTense locates the situation in question after a contextually determined temporal reference point, regardless of the latter's relation to the moment of utterance. Also called FuturePerfectTense (Comrie 1985:69-71). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/RelativeFuture) A verb tense that refers to an action or state of being completed in the future. Translation into English requires the use of the auxiliary verbs will/shall have. (www.southwestern.edu/~carlg/Latin_Web/glossary.html; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1292) A tense of verbs describing an action that will have been performed by a certain time. In English this is formed with will have or shall have plus the past participle. (www.wordreference.com/English/definition.asp?en=future+perfect; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1292)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RelativeTense
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MultiplicativeMarker
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	introduced for Urdu gunâ (http://purl.org/olia/emille.owl#MultiplicativeMarker)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In Urdu, multiplicative numerals are formed by adding the suffix gunâ (Schmidt 1999, p. 260,http://purl.org/olia/emille.owl#MultiplicativeMarker)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Unique
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Classifier
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Added for compatibility with the SFB632 annotation guidelines.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A classifier is a word or affix that expresses the classification of a noun. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAClassifier.htm 19.09.06) Classifiers are a very typical feature of sign languages. In some Asian languages, classifiers are used as particles to combine a noun with a numeral, e.g. chin. _san ge ren_ 'three pieces of people', 'three people' (Bußmann 2002, under Klassifikator) Bharati et al. (2006, for Indian languages) group Classifiers together with Quantifiers and Numerals, but they do not provide a detailed characterization of this class. Akshar Bharati, Dipti Misra Sharma, Lakshmi Bai, Rajeev Sangal (2006), AnnCorra : Annotating Corpora. Guidelines For POS And Chunk Annotation For Indian Languages, Tech. Rep., L anguage Technologies Research Centre IIIT, Hyderabad, version of 15-12-2006, http://ltrc.iiit.ac.in/tr031/posguidelines.pdf
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Unique
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TerminativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/TerminativeCase, http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1401
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Case that indicates to what or where something ends. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1401) TerminativeCase expresses the notion of something into but not further than (ie, not through) the referent of the noun it marks. It has the meaning 'into but not through'. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/TerminativeCase)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NonAgentiveVerb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from Dzongkha tagset (Chungku et al. 2010, http://purl.org/olia/dzongkha.owl#NonAgentiveVerb
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A non-agentive verb is a type of verb, which indicates an action without the doer. Example: ང་མ་ འ ར་ ས། 'lungma phur-dä 'A wind is blowing' (http://panl10n.net/english/Outputs%20Phase%202/CCs/Bhutan/Papers/2007/0701/PartOfSpeech.pdf)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MainVerb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MixedInflection
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	German mixed inflection takes its name from the fact that it has endings from both the strong inflection and the weak inflection. The mixed inflection is used after the indefinite article "ein" and after "irgendein" e.g. "(irgend) ein kleines Kind", after "kein" or after possessive pronouns e.g. "ihr kleines Kind". (http://www.canoo.net/services/OnlineGrammar/Wort/Adjektiv/Deklinationstyp/Gemischt.html?MenuId=Word3132 20.11.06) Mixed inflection is a characteristic of lexemes, not individual tokens.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#InflectionTypeFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SuperablativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Superablative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Superablative expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location from over which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'from over'. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Superablative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Positive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES, http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1420
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Value used in a comparison relationship when no comparison is involved. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1420) The Positive is the form of an adjective or adverb on which comparative and superlative are formed. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive 17.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#DegreeFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Bullet
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	bullet
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf partOfSpeech (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1438
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Sign used to mark an item in a list. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1438)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LayoutElement
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FocusAntipassive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/FocusAntipassive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Blocks the P or logical object (basic absolutive) nominal from being assigned Focus salience. Topic salience is available for assignment to various arguments, including the P, but Focus salience is always assigned to A, and is therefore inaccessible to P or any other nominal. (Klaiman 1991:236) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/FocusAntipassive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Antipassive
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ModifierAdverb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#ModifierAdverb
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Adverb/Type="modifier" is used in the English, Romanian and Hungarian MTE v4 specs. For Romanian, Adverb/Type="modifier" applies to adverbs which can have predicative role, that is they can govern a subordinate sentence (ex. Fireşte că o ştiu -- Certainly I know it). Here (for uniformity within a multilingual environment), they are squeezed into the modifier class. (MTE v4) e.g., better (en) (http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#ModifierAdverb)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adverb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CommonGender
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Common is an optional attribute for nouns in EAGLES. The Common gender contrasts with Neuter in a two-gender system e.g. Danish, Dutch. This value is also used for articles, pronouns and determiners especially for Danish. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node19.html#oav2at 17.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#GenderFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TimeNoun
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3855
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:26
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	deprecated, as merely a shorthand for Noun and hasSemanticRole some TimeRole
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	noun expressing time
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Distal
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in accordance with http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#CliticDistalDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The referent denoted by a distal demonstrative pronoun (e.g., English that) is usually spatially more remote or discoursally less salient as compared to a referent denoted by a proximal demonstrative pronoun (e.g., English this) (Chiarcos)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ProximityFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#BaseForm
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	SUSANNE (Sampson 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Strong inflection is a characteristic of lexemes, not individual tokens. In traditional English tagsets, e.g., SUSANNE or the PennTreeBank tagset, surface ambiguities are normally not resolved. Uninflected forms and forms that have the same form (e.g., "be" as an imperative) are tagged as BaseForm. (Ch. Chiarcos) Since it is impractical (...) to resolve automatically the ambiguity of these six morphological functions, it is a common practice to assign a single value to the base form, or else to assign two values, one for the finite and one for the non-finite functions. Because of this, the tables below show two tagsets: one tagset representing the 6 attribute-values above, and a reduced tagset (`RTags'), which resembles most tagsets so far used for the English language in reducing the six values to two. http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/morphsyn/node150.html#SECTION00054000000000000000 BaseForm is not a characteristic of lexemes, but specific to certain forms in a complex paradigm.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#InflectionTypeFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#WithComparative
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES, reimplemented within SubordinatingConjunction taxonomy
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	For example, in German the subordinating conjunction "als" is followed by various kinds of comparative clause (including clauses without finite verbs). (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node19.html#oav2u 17.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SubordTypeFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Masculine
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES, http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#masculineGender
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Masculine gender is a grammatical gender that marks nouns, articles, pronouns, etc. having human or animal male referents, and often marks nouns having referents that do not have distinctions of sex. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/glossaryoflinguisticterms/WhatIsMasculineGender.htm 17.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#GenderFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Conjunct
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TIGER edge label CJ
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	TIGER edge label CJ
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SyntacticRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#BeAuxiliary
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	be
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf partOfSpeech (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1246
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Verb used to link the subject of a sentence and its noun or adjective complement or complementing phrase in certain languages. This verb could be used also to form the passive voice. (www.wordreference.com/English/definition.asp?en=be -> 4); http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1246)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#StrictAuxiliaryVerb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FirstExclusive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/FirstExclusive, modelled as a subconcept of First here
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Refers to the speaker and one or more nonparticipants, but not hearer(s). Contrasts with FirstPersonInclusive (Crystal 1997: 285). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/FirstExclusive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#First
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Exclusive
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PreverbalParticle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1455 (preverbalParticleLmf)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Particle
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MiddleField
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In a German clause, the finite verb can appear in three different positions: verb-second, verb-initial, and verb-final. Only in verb-final clauses the verb complex consisting of the finite verb and non-finite verbal elements forms a unit. The discontinuous positioning of the verbal elements in verb-first and verb-second clauses is the traditional reason for structuring German clauses into fields. The positions of the verbal elements form the Satzklammer (sentence bracket) which divides the sentence into a Vorfeld (initial field), a Mittelfeld (middle field), and a Nachfeld (final field). The Vorfeld and the Mittelfeld are divided by the linke Satzklammer (left sentence bracket), which is the finite verb, the rechte Satzklammer (right sentence bracket) is the verb complex between the Mittelfeld and the Nachfeld. (Telljohann et al. 2009, p.13)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#TopologicalField
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ReflexivePassive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/ReflexivePassive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A Passive construction which contains reflexive markings. (Siewierska 1988:257) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/ReflexivePassive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PassiveVoice
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AbilitativeMood
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Adopted from ILPOSTS (for Indian languages), http://purl.org/olia/ilposts.owl#AbilitativeMood
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Abilitative is a mood that indicates ability, comparable to the use of "can" in English. (http://zbb.spinnwebe.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=34901)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MoodFeature
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AbilitativeModality
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LeftSentenceBracket
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In a German clause, the finite verb can appear in three different positions: verb-second, verb-initial, and verb-final. Only in verb-final clauses the verb complex consisting of the finite verb and non-finite verbal elements forms a unit. The discontinuous positioning of the verbal elements in verb-first and verb-second clauses is the traditional reason for structuring German clauses into fields. The positions of the verbal elements form the Satzklammer (sentence bracket) which divides the sentence into a Vorfeld (initial field), a Mittelfeld (middle field), and a Nachfeld (final field). The Vorfeld and the Mittelfeld are divided by the linke Satzklammer (left sentence bracket), which is the finite verb, the rechte Satzklammer (right sentence bracket) is the verb complex between the Mittelfeld and the Nachfeld. (Telljohann et al. 2009, p.13)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#TopologicalField
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DistributivePronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from ILPOSTS (for Indian languages), http://purl.org/olia/ilposts.owl#Distributivity is a property of Pronominals
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	When the subject is conjoined, the reflexive cannot refer to only one of them. The proform has to be a distributive pronoun, i.e., the reduplicated form, when it has coreference to respective subjects, e.g., *kumaarum_i/Kumar.and umaavum_j/Uma.and tan_i+j/self-poss puunekki/cat.to paalu/milk kuDuttaanaanga/give-pst-aggr. "*Kumar_i and Uma gave milk to his_i/her_j cat." (Annamalai 2000, p. 189, on Tamil) Unlike reciprocals, the two parts of a distributive pronoun cannot be considered as two full, independent NPs. In "awar/1 awar/2", only "awar/2" is case marked; "awar/1" is its citation form. Also, the two parts cannot be separated by intervening material (cf. English "one another"). (Jayaseelan 2000, p. 149, on Malayalam) (K.A. Jayaseelan, 2000, Lexical anaphors and pronouns in Malayalam, In: Barbara C. Lust, Kashi Wali, James W. Gair, K.V.Subharao (eds.), Lexical Anaphors and Pronouns in Selected South Asian Languages. A Principled Typology, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, p. 113-168) (E. Annamalai, 2000, Lexical anaphors and pronouns in Tamil, , In: Barbara C. Lust, Kashi Wali, James W. Gair, K.V.Subharao (eds.), Lexical Anaphors and Pronouns in Selected South Asian Languages. A Principled Typology, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, p. 169-216)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Pronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NominalQuantifier
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	quantifier noun
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:27
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	shorthand for Quantifier and Noun, adopted from Dzongkha tagset (Chungku et al. 2010)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A noun which quantifies one or more things, regardless of subject and an object. ང་གིས་ བམོ་ ལ་ དང་ ཕད་ཅི། NGAGI BUM 'NGA 'DA CHECI I girl five with met “I met with five girls.” (Jurmey Rabgay, email Sep 20, 2010)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Quantifier
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#HabitualMood
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#HabitualAspect
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from ILPOSTS, http://purl.org/olia/ilposts.owl#HabitualMood, I assume that HabitualMood is equivalent with HabitualAspect, hence no corresponding HabitualModality has been introduced
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	"Habitual" is normally considered to be an aspect. Occasionally, it is, however, also described as a mood, e.g., by Bittner (2008, p. 354) for Kalaalisut (Greenlandic). Maria Bittner (2008), Aspectual universals of temporal anaphora, In: Susan Deborah Rothstein (ed.), Theoretical and crosslinguistic approaches to the semantics of aspect, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, p. 349-386.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MoodFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#EpistemicNecessityModality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	categorical modality
	epistemic necessitiy modality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3180
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	EpistemicNecessityModality indicates that the expressed proposition is known to be true. Also known as CategoricalModality [Palmer 2001: 37, 68-69].
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ModalityFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DegreeAdverb
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	specifier adverb
	degree adverb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Adverb with Adverb-Type="Degree".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Any adverb which modifies an adjective, an adverb, a verbal particle, a preposition, a conjunction or a determiner is a degree adverb. (http://xlex.uni-muenster.de/Portal/MTPE/tagsetDescriptionEN.doc, p. 113, 8.1 Degree Adverbs 23.09.06) Also known as specifier adverb (http://www.unlweb.net/unlarium/dictionary/export_tagset.php)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adverb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PerlativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Perlative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	PerlativeCase expresses that something moved 'through','across', or 'along' the referent of the noun that is marked (Blake 1998: 38, 203). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Perlative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ExtentRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in conformance with PTB bracketing guidelines, Bies et al. (1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	-EXT (extent) â ´ marks adverbial phrases that describe the spatial extent of an activity. -EXT was incorporated primarily for cases of movement in financial space, but is also used in analogous situations elsewhere. (S (NP-SBJ the Dow Jones Industrial Average) (VP plunged (NP-EXT 190.58 points))) (S (NP-SBJ She) (VP walked (NP-EXT 5 miles))) Obligatory complements do not receive -EXT: (S (NP-SBJ The sumo wrestler) (VP gained (NP 80 pounds))) Words such as fully and completely are absolutes and do not receive -EXT. (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SemanticRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#VerbalAdverb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#VerbalAdverb
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Adverb/Type="verbal" applies to adverbs derived from from verbs (verbal adverbs) in the Serbian, Macedonian and Hungarian MTE v4 specs. Macedonian verbal adverbs (gerunds) like odejkji are thus not considered as verbal forms, but as Adverb/Type="verbal". (MTE v4) (http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#VerbalAdverb)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adverb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FacultativePrepositionalObject
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TüBa-D/Z edge label FOPP
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	facultative (i.e. optional) prepositional object, e.g., passivized subject (von-phrase)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PrepositionalObject
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ReducedInflection
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#NominalAdjective
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Reduced adjective inflection of Slavic languages, e.g., Czech e.g., brillská/brillský, neznámo/neznámý, samo/sám, samy/sám (http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#NominalAdjective)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#StrengthFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Formula
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES category Residual with the attribute Type="Formula".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A formula (mathematical formulae) is a text word which lies outside the traditionally accepted range of grammatical classes, it occurs quite commonly in many texts and very commonly in some. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node16.html#mr 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Residual
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CausalAdverb
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:28
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#CausalAdverb
	DEPRECATED: equivalent to Adverb and hasSemanticRole some CauseRole
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Adverb/Type="causal" is used in the Hungarian MTE v4, but no examples are provided. (http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#CausalAdverb)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adverb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DirectSpeech
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in accordance with TIGER
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	added in accordance with TIGER
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#NarrativeType
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InfrequentlyUsed
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	infrequently used
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1985
	subClassOf frequency (dcif:conceptualDomain)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Said of a term that does not appear frequently. (ISO12620; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1985)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Possible
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IntertranslativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Intertranslative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	IntertranslativeCase expresses the notion of something moving along a trajectory between the referent of the noun it marks. It has the meaning 'along the in between. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Intertranslative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NonInitialCoordinatingConjunction
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	When two distinct words occur, as in German weder...noch..., then the second is given the Non-initial value. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node18.html#oav1av 17.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CoordinatingConjunction
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ThirdProximative
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/ThirdProximative, modelled here under Third
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Proximative refers to one or more non-participants that are in some way distinct/closer to the speaker than other non-particpants. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/ThirdProximative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Third
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DeductiveEvidentiality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3150
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	DeductiveEvidentiality encodes the fact that the speaker came to believe the content of the expression through a sound inference procedure. [Palmer 2001: 6-8].
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#EvidentialityFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SociativeCase
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	sociative case
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1388
	TODO: check whether this is really different from comitative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Case related to the person in whose company the action is carried out, or to any belongings of people which take part in the action. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1388)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InterablativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Interablative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	InterablativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location from between which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'from inbetween'. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Interablative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ObjectControl
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.lexinfo.net/ontology/2.0/lexinfo#ObjectControl
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Indicates the object of the main clause is also the (omitted) object of the subclause (http://www.lexinfo.net/ontology/2.0/lexinfo#ObjectControl)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Control
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubtranslativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Subtranslative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	SubtranslativeCase expresses the notion of something moving along a trajectory underneath the referent of the noun it marks. It has the meaning 'along the region underneath'. Unfortunate name clash with 'Superlative' as a feature of adjectives. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Subtranslative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Negation
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	negative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1839
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	denotes the negation or the absence (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1839) http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#Negated: Negative="yes" encodes negative verbal word-forms in Slavic languages and Estonian. (MTE v4) In Slovak, for example, verbs form negative by prefix 'ne-', with the exception of the verb "byť" (E. "to be") which forms the negative in indicative by using separate particle "nie", e.g. "nie je" (is not). Here, Slovak "je" would be marked as negative, despite having positive form. In Resian, negative is always marked as 'n' except for two verbs: 'nïman' / not to have, 'nïsi' / not to be. (MTE v4)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#PolarityFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PossessiveArticle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#PossessiveArticle
	not to be confused with PoessiveDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In Romanian, the possessive article (also called genitival article) is an element in the structure of the possessive pronoun, of the ordinal numeral (e.g. al meu (mine) and al treilea (the third)), and of the indefinite genitive forms of the nouns (e.g. capitol al cărţii (chapter of the book)), e.g., -al/al, a/al, ai/al, al, ale/al, alor/al (http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#PossessiveArticle)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Article
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubjunctiveVerb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TODO: remodelling by properties
	EAGLES finite verbs with VerbForm="Subjunctive".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A subjunctive verb is typically used to expresses wishes, commands (in subordinate clauses), emotion, possibility, judgment, necessity, and statements that are contrary to fact at present. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subjunctive_mood 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FiniteVerb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PossessiveParticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	possessive particle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1895
	subClassOf particle (dcif:isA)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Particle expressing ownship. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1895)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Particle
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FormalCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#FormalCase
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In Hungarian, `essive-formal' is in some descriptions simply called `formal', with the affix _-képp(en)_ and meaning (`in the form of ...', they probably meant when they came up with the term). In the Hungarian MULTEXT-East scheme, essive-formal and formal are distinguished. (Ivan A. Derzhanski, email 2010/06/15, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#FormalCase)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Dative case marks indirect objects (for languages in which they are held to exist), or nouns having the role of a recipient (as of things given), a beneficiary of an action, or a possessor of an item. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/glossaryoflinguisticterms/WhatIsDativeCase.htm 17.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IntranslativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Intranslative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	IntranslativeCase expresses the notion of something moving through the referent of the noun it marks. It has the meaning 'along through'. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Intranslative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NonEmphatic
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in accordance with ILPOSTS, cf. http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#EmphaticDeterminer, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#EmphaticPronoun
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In languages where emphasis can be grammatically marked, the unmarked form would be considered NonEmphatic, see #Emphatic
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#EmphasisFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasObjectPerson
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#PersonFeature
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	object person
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#domain	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Verb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2279
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	person for the object of the verb (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2279)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#OtherAnimacy
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	other animacy
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf animacy (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1953
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Perceived as related to animacy, but without specific reference to the previous items. (ISO12620; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1953)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#AnimacyFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MalefactorRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#maleficiaryRole
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A maleficiary (malefactor) instantiates the role of an entity (usually animate) who stands to undergoe a misfortune, or be at a disadvantage in some way from the event. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#maleficiaryRole)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#UndergoerMacroRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ProlativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1368
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Case for a noun or a pronoun that expresses motion within a place or a period of time needed for an event. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1368)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#BenefactorRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#beneficiaryRole
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A beneficiary (benefactor) instantiates the role of an entity (usually animate) who stands to benefit in some way from the event. Prototypically “benefit” here means “to do or be good to, to be of advantage or profit to; to improve, help forward” in some way. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#beneficiaryRole)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#UndergoerMacroRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FusedPronounAuxiliary
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3008
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	word resulting from the aggregation of a pronoun and an auxiliary
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Pronoun
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AuxiliaryVerb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NonpromotionalInverseVoice
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/NonpromotionalInverse
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Involves demotion of the non-topical obviate-agent from subjecthood. (Givon 1994:24) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/NonpromotionalInverse)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InverseVoice
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PeriodicAdjective
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/dzongkha.owl#PeriodicAdjective
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	It is an adjective, which expresses the time or period of the circumstances, while modifying a noun. ན་ ང་ ང་ ་ ལ་ ་ འ ་ ། Nahing Nga chigyel-lu joyi 'I went abroad last year' (http://panl10n.net/english/Outputs%20Phase%202/CCs/Bhutan/Papers/2007/0701/PartOfSpeech.pdf)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adjective
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Accusative
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In nominative-accusative languages, accusative case marks certain syntactic functions, usually direct objects. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/glossaryoflinguisticterms/WhatIsAccusativeCase.htm 17.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ConjunctionPhrase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Penn bracketing guidelines, Bies et al. 1995
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Multi-word conjunction Besides the usual and, or, but, etc., certain prepositions and subordinating conjunctions can be used as coordinating conjunctions. Multi-word coordinating conjunctions are labeled CONJP (see section 7 [Coordination]). ... CONJP — Conjunction Phrase. Used to mark certain “multi-word” conjunctions, such as as well as, instead of. (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Phrase
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Conjunction
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RecentPast
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/RecentPast
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	RecentPastTense locates the situation in question prior to the present moment, but by culturally and situationally defined criteria, usually within the span ranging from yesterday to a week or a few months previous (Comrie 1985:87; Dahl 1985:121-122). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/RecentPast)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Past
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Point
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	point
	dot
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf partOfSpeech (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1445
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Sign (.) used to expresses the end of a sentence or an abbreviation. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1445)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SentenceFinalPunctuation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AversiveCase
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3096
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	AversiveCase expresses fear or is literally translated as 'turning from' in some languages [Blake 2001: 156].
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IndefiniteArticle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Article with Article-Type="Indefinite".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An indefinite article is used before singular nouns that refer to any member of a group. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_%28grammar%29 18.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Article
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SlangRegister
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	slang register
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf register (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1995
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An extremely informal register of a word, term, or text that is used in spoken and everyday language and less commonly in documents. (ISO12620; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#RegisterFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PurposiveCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in accordance with the ILPOSTS tagset for a case marker (postposition) in Indian languages, cf. http://purl.org/olia/ilposts.owl#PurposiveCase
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Purposive marks the goal of an activity, e.g., 'going out FOR (i.e. to catch) KANGAROOS'; 'call them FOR (i.e. to eat) FOOD'. The common purposive suffix -gu is a recurrent suffix on verbs ... The purposive case suffix is often used on a nominalised clause (and this may possibly be the origin of the verbal purposive). (Dixon 2002, p.134, on purposive case in [several] Australian languages) R.M.W. Dixon (2002), Australian Languages. CUP, Cambridge
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ShortDefiniteArticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	short article
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1927 (short article)
	DCR: subClassOf definiteness (dcif:conceptualDomain)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	For definiteness, when a specific form is not the syntactic subject of the clause. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1927)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DefiniteArticle
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CollectiveNumeral
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#CollectiveNumeral
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	e.g., czworga/czworo, czworgiem/czworo, czworgu/czworo, czworo/czworo, dwoje/dwoje, dwojga/dwoje, dwojgiem/dwoje, dwojgu/dwoje, jedenaścioro/jedenaścioro (pl, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#CollectiveNumeral)
	Numeral/Type="collect" (Romanian) In traditional Romanian grammars, expressions like amândoi "both", toţi trei "all three" are referred to as collective numerals. (MTE v4, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#CollectiveNumeral)
	e.g., ambelor/ambii, ambilor/ambii, amânduror/amândoi, amândurora/amândoi, câteşipatru, tuspatru (ro, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#CollectiveNumeral)
	e.g., обата, обајцата, обете, шеесетминава/шеесетмина, шеесетминана/шеесетмина, шеесетмината/шеесетмина, шеснаесетминава/шеснаесетмина, шеснаесетминана/шеснаесетмина, шеснаесетмината/шеснаесетмина (mk, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#CollectiveNumeral)
	e.g., dvadesetora/dvadesetoro, dvoja/dvoje, dvoje, dvoji/dvoje, dvojih/dvoje, dvojim/dvoje, oboje, tridesetora/tridesetoro, troja/troje (sr, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#CollectiveNumeral)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Numeral
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RomanNumeral
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1936
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Numeral expressed with roman digits.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Numeral
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#String
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AgentDeletionPassive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/AgentDeletionPassive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The object of the active retains its old case-marking in the passive, the subject of the active cannot appear in the passive clause, and the passive tends to be semantically active. (Givon 1988:419) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/AgentDeletionPassive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PassiveVoice
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ForeignPhrase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TüBa-D/Z
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Single foreign words are projected to a syntactic level assigned the node label FX, which is an universal label for any syntactic category (phrasal and sentential) in the respective foreign language. (Telljohann et al. 2009, p.44)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Phrase
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PerfectiveAspect
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES, http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Perfective
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The perfective aspects (inceptive, punctual and completive) view the situation as a bounded entity, and often put an emphasis on its beginning or end. (Bybee 1985:21) (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#perfectiveAspect) The Perfective aspect is an aspect that expresses a temporal view of an event or state as a simple whole, apart from the consideration of the internal structure of the time in which it occurs. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/glossaryoflinguisticterms/WhatIsPerfectiveAspect.htm 17.11.06) A viewpoint aspect which encodes the speaker’s willingness to attend to the endpoints of the situation referred to. Perfective aspect is the canonical mode of presentation for events (Michaelis 1998: xv). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Perfective)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#AspectFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IndicativeMood
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TODO: check relationship with DeclarativeMood
	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Indicative, http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#indicativeModality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The indicative is the unmarked mood. It is used when no special modal nuance in the clause or sentence is intended. It is the default mood of independent declarative and often also of interrogative sentences. (http://www.uni-erfurt.de/sprachwissenschaft/proxy.php?port=8080&file=lido/servlet/Lido_Servlet Indikativ 18.06.07) Expression of assertion. (Bybee 1985:22) Pertaining to the mood or mode of a verb form or clause such that it predicates a stated relation of objective fact (OED). (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#indicativeModality)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MoodFeature
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DeclarativeModality
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ModalVerb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Added for compatibility with the SFB632 annotation guidelines. May correspond to the (optional, French-only) EAGLES feature value "semiauxiliary". http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1329
	TODO: rename to semiauxiliary, this seems to be a more language-independent term
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Verb form that is usually used with another verb to express ideas such as possibilities, permission, or intention. (Gil Francopoulo; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1329) A modal verb (also modal, modal auxiliary verb, modal auxiliary) is a type of auxiliary verb that is used to indicate modality. The use of auxiliary verbs to express modality is characteristic of Germanic languages. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modal_verb 19.09.06) In addition to main and auxiliary verbs, it may be useful (e.g. in English) to recognise an intermediate category of semi-auxiliary for such verbs as be going to, have got to, ought to. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node18.html#oav1v 20.09.06) The auxiliaries in English subdivide into the primary verbs `be', `have', and `do', which can also function as main verbs, and the modal auxiliaries such as `can', `will', and `would', which are uninflected, and always function as auxiliaries. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/morphsyn/node158.html#SECTION00054800000000000000)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AuxiliaryVerb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubjunctiveParticle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#SubjunctiveParticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In the Romanian MULTEXT-East scheme, a verbal particle with Particle/Type="future" modifies the verbs and marks the verb as being subjunctive, e.g., s-/să, să (Dan Tufis, email 2010/06/09, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#SubjunctiveParticle)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#VerbalParticle
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#OpenAngleBracket
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	PTB bracketing guidelines, Santorini 1991
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	< *LAB* Left angle bracket (Santorini 1991)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LeftParentheticalPunctuation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IndefiniteCardinalQuantifier
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	indefinite cardinal numeral
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3023 (indefiniteCardinalNumeral)
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	ndefiniteCardinalNumeral: A word used to express imprecise quantity.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IndefiniteQuantifier
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FacetiousRegister
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	facecious register
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1991
	subClassOf register (dcif:conceptualDomain)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Register related to an expression that is intended to be clever and funny but that is really silly and annoying. (Longma DCE; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1991)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#RegisterFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LocativeCase
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	locative case
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1326
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Case that indicates a final location of action or a time of the action. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1326)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#WHAdjectivePhrase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in conformance with PTB bracketing guidelines (Santorini 1991, Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	WHADJP â ´ Wh-adjective Phrase. Adjectival phrase containing a wh-adverb, as in how hot. (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AdjectivePhrase
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#EpistemicPossibilityModality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3181
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	EpistemicPossibilityModality indicates that the designated state of affairs is not known not to be true.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ModalityFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ThemeRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in conformance with SFB632 Theme
	TODO: check definition, AFAIK Theme also applies to the third (non-ACTOR, non-UNDERGOER) argument (Ch. Chiarcos)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Theme is a general term covering the notions of patient that means an entity affected by the action, of result that means an entity effected by the action, i.e. which emerges out of the action, or of theme that means an entity effected by the action, i.e. which emerges out of the action. (Dipper et al. 2007: §5.3.3)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SemanticRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InvertedQuestionMark
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	inverted question mark
	inverted interrogative point
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2088
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Punctuation used in certain languages at the beginning of an interrogative sentence. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2088)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LeftParentheticalPunctuation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RecipientRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#recipientRole
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A recipient instantiates the role of an entity (usually animate) who recieves an entity in some way from the event. Prototypically “recieve” here means “to take in one’s hand, or into one’s possession (something held out or offered by another); to take delivery of (a thing) from another” in some way. (OED) (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#recipientRole)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#UndergoerMacroRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Infinitive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES NonFiniteVerbs with VerbForm="Infinitive"
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An infinitive is the base form of a verb. It is unmarked for inflectional categories such as the following: Aspect, Modality, Number, Person and Tense. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAnInfinitive.htm 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NonFiniteVerb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RelativeParticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	relative particle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2229
	subClassOf particle (dcif:isA)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	relative particle (MIRACL & LSCA; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2229)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Particle
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ReciprocalMiddle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/ReciprocalMiddle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Referents of plural subject do action to one another. (Siewierska 1988:257) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/ReciprocalMiddle)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MiddleVoice
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ObliqueRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#obliqueRole
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A semantic role which is not straightforward. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#obliqueCase)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SemanticRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CompletiveAspect
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	completive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-5474
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	To do something thoroughly and to completion.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#AspectFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DemonstrativePronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TODO: This definition is nonsatisfactory, cf. Ehlich (1982) for intra-textual ("anadeictic") uses of demonstratives.
	EAGLES Pronoun with Pron.-Type="Demonstrative".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Demonstrative pronouns are deictic words (they depend on an external frame of reference). They indicate which entities a speaker refers to, and distinguishes those entities from others. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demonstrative_pronoun 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Pronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Gapping
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	PTB bracketing guidelines (Santorini 1991)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The term "gapping" refers to a form of coordination in which the coordinated phrases after the rst are incomplete. For instance, the gapped equivalent of the full coordination structure in (@18a) is given in ( 18b). ( 18) a. Mary likes Bach and Susan likes Beethoven. b. Mary likes Bach and Susan, Beethoven. Gapped sequences like Susan, Beethoven should be labelled X. On the other hand, while coordination constructions containing gapped sequences involve coordination of unlike categories, it is clear that the entire coordination structure is a clause; hence, it should be labelled S. (Santorini 1991)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#NullElement
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Simple
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Simple applies to the regular type of coordinator occurring between conjuncts: German und, for example. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node18.html#oav1av 17.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CoordTypeFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ContinuousAspect
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Continuous
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Similar to progressive, however an aspect is continuous versus progressive when it is anchored to non-punctual time reference (Salaberry 2002:264). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Continuous)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#AspectFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MultipleNumeral
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	multiple numeral
	multiplicative numeral
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#MultipleNumeral, http://purl.org/olia/urdu.owl#MultiplicativeNumeral; As "manyfold" fits Ghostwick's definition, MultipleNumeral is modelled as a subclass of Quantifier rather than Numeral. In MULTEXT-East, "Numeral" was extended to coover non-numerical quantifiers, hence the name.
	TODO: rename to MultiplicativeNumeral
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A Multiple Numeral serves to define a complex whole, with respect to the number of its parts, e.g., English "twofold", "twice" or "manyfold". Used in morphosyntactic descriptions of, e.g., Romanian, Slovak and Czech. (Joseph Ghostwick [1878], English language -- Grammar, Historical, London, Longmans, Green, and Co.; http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#MultipleNumeral)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Quantifier
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ExclamativePoint
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	exclamative point
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf partOfSpeech (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1441
	MainPunctuation, not SentenceFinalPunctuation because of the Spanish inverted exclamation point (Chiarcos)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Special sign (!) usually used in writing to mark exclamation. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1441)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MainPunctuation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#WeakPersonalPronoun
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	weak personal pronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf personalPronoun (dcif:isA)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1414
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Personal pronoun that cannot occupy the position after a preposition and/or reinforce a strong personal pronoun. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1414)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PersonalPronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LightVerb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#LightVerb, for Farsi
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In linguistics, a light verb is a verb participating in complex predication that has little semantic content of its own, but provides through inflection some details on the event semantics, such as aspect, mood, or tense. The semantics of the compound, as well as its argument structure, are determined by the head or primary component of the compound, which may be a verb or noun (V+V or V+N compounds). Other names for "light verb" include: vector verb or explicator verb, emphasising its role within the compound; or thin verb or semantically weak verb, emphasising (as with "light") its lack of semantics. A "semantically weak" verb is not to be confused with a "weak verb" as in the Germanic weak inflection. Light verbs are similar to auxiliary verbs in some ways. Most English light verbs occur in V+N forms sometimes called "stretched verbs": for example, take in take a nap, where the primary sense is provided by "nap", and "take" is the light verb. The light verbs most common in these constructions are also common in phrasal verbs. A verb which is "light" in one context may be "heavy" in another: as with "take" in I will take a book to read. Examples in other languages include the Yiddish geb in geb a helf (literally give a help, "help"); the French faire in faire semblant (lit. make seeming, "pretend"); the Hindi nikal paRA (lit. leave fall, "start to leave"); and the bǎ construction in Chinese.[1] Some verbs are found in many such expressions; to reuse an earlier example, take is found in take a nap, take a shower, take a sip, take a bow, take turns, and so on. Light verbs are extremely common in Indo-Iranian languages, Japanese, and other languages in which verb compounding is a primary mechanism for marking aspectual distinctions. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_verb)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Verb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Uninflected
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	For the EMILLE tagset (for Urdu, Hardi 2003), we need the possibility to specify that a lexeme is (un)inflected ([un]marked) *for a specific feature* (e.g., Gender, http://purl.org/olia/emille.owl#GenderMarking). At the moment, this cannot be expressed.
	Chiarcos, cf. BaseForm in Susanne (Sampson 1995) and related schemes, and http://purl.org/olia/emille.owl#UnmarkedForGender
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In many inflecting languages, there occur lexemes whose form does not change throughout the paradigm, e.g., Russian papa "dad". For such forms, the category uninflected may be assigned. However, Uninflected is not to be confused with BaseForm that applies to forms in a paradigm where overt marking exists. Uninflected is a characteristic of lexemes, not individual tokens.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#InflectionTypeFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PatientRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#patientRole
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A patient instantiates the role of an entity which undergoes a change of state (Cruse 2000:284) http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#patientRole
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#UndergoerMacroRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#VisualEvidentiality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3549
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	VisualEvidentiality encodes the fact that the speaker came to believe the content of the expression through direct visual experience; they saw it [Palmer 2001: 57].
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#EvidentialityFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#OmittedUnit
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in conformance with PTB bracketing guidelines (Santorini 1991, Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	*U* â ´ unit ... This element marks the interpreted position of a unit symbol, such as $, # (British pounds), FFr (French francs), C$, US$, HK$, A$, M$, S$, and NZ$. It may also appear after % or even cents, when convenient. See section 11 [Modification of NP] for more details on the use of *U*. ... In general, *U* is placed where the word corresponding to the symbol would appear in the string if the text were read aloud. One notable exception is in certain hyphenated compound adjectives, such as a $5-a-share increase (spoken: â ¼A five dollar a share increaseâ ½). Here, the bracketing will usually not reflect the spoken order, with *U* placed as the last element in the ADJP: (NP a (ADJP $ 5-a-share *U*) increase) Sometimes, this type may lack the *U* entirely. (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#NullElement
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Letter
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	letter
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1889
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Letter. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1889)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Character
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FutureParticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	future particle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1919, taxonomic organization (under VerbalParticle) follows http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#FutureParticle, regrouped under TenseMarkingParticle
	subClassOf particle (dcif:isA)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Particle used in order to express future. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1919)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TenseMarkingParticle
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TimitiveMood
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Timitive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	TimitiveMood expresses that the speaker fears something expressed in what is said (Palmer 2001: 13, 22). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Timitive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MoodFeature
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TimitiveModality
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#VerbalPredicate
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	introduced for non-nominal predicates, normally referred to as ``predicate'' (Ch. Chiarcos)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The predicate of the clause is represented by a verbal lexeme. (Ch. Chiarcos)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Predicate
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NonNegated
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#NonNegated
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Non-negated verbs carry no morphological marks of negation. In Resian, negative is always marked as 'no' except for two verbs: 'nïman' / not to have, 'nïsi' / not to be. In Slovak, verbs form negative by prefix 'ne-', with the exception of the verb "byť" (E. "to be") which forms the negative in indicative by using separate particle "nie", e.g. "nie je" (is not). Here, "je" would be marked as negative, despite having positive form. (MTE v4, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#NonNegated)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#PolarityFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Homograph
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1300
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Word that is written like another, but that has a different pronunciation, meaning, and/or origin.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#Relation
	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#LexicalRelation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IncorporatingAntipassive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/IncorporatingAntipassive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Blocks the P or logical object (basic absolutive) nominal from being assigned Focus salience. This correlates with the P's morphosyntactic downgrading, whereby it becomes insusceptible to any informational salience assignment. (Klaiman 1991:236) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/IncorporatingAntipassive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Antipassive
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CloseFuture
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/CloseFuture, classified as AbsoluteTense here
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Adopted from GOLD. No definition given.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AbsoluteTense
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ElementDemandingClitic
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#DemandingClitic
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Expression representing a lexeme with cliticization whose clitics are, however, represented as a separate token
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ElementWithoutClitic
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#GoalRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#goalRole
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A goal role instantiates the (intended) end location (directional path) of an event. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#goalRole)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SemanticRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubablativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Subablative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	SubablativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location from under which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'from under'. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Subablative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ElativeNoun
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3860
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in compliance with ISOcat
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	noun to express both comparative and superlative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ElativeDegree
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CommonNoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Quadrial
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	quadrial
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf grammaticalNumber (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2000
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Property related to four elements. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2000)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#NumberFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SuperlativeParticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	superlative particle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf particle (dcif:isA)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1923
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Particle expressing superlative degree. Superlative is the comparison between more than two entities and contrasts with comparative where only two entities are involved and positive where no comparison is implied. (Crystal 2003; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1923)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Particle
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ExpletiveCorrelate
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TüBa-D/Z
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Three different expletive usages [of the German expletive pronoun es] are traditionally distinguished: formal subject or object (expletive argument), correlate of an extraposed clausal argument (expletive correlate), and Vorfeld-es (structural expletive) (cf. (Eisenberg 1999 2001), (Pütz 1986)). (Telljohann et al. 2009, p.60) Extraposed clausal arguments: "Aber [es] ist übertrieben zu sagen, damit bekäme die FU erst eine Identität." (Telljohann et al. 2009, p.62)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ExpletivePronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DiscourseMarker
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Introduced in accordance with the TIGER and TüBa-D/Z annotation schemes (syntactic edge label)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Generally, discourse markers are expressions or phrases of greeting, apologizing, thanking, short emotional utterances, and interjections. Their node label is DM. ... Typical discourse markers are: ja, nein, hallo, oh, aha, pst, nunja, gewiß, toll, nun ja, etc. (Telljohann et al. 2009, p. 136)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Unique
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ExistentialPronoun
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:29
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3012
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	merely a shorthand for ExistentialParticle and Pronoun, hence deprecated
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	pronoun that indicates the existence of something or someone
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AttributiveAdjective
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Adjective with Use="Attributive".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An attributive adjective is an adjective that qualifies or modifies a noun and that precedes the noun, e.g."a delicious apple", "a short letter". (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adjective 18.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adjective
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AbsolutiveAntipassive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/AbsolutiveAntipassive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An Antipassive in which the P or logical object is suppressed or overtly absent. (Klaiman 1991:232) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/AbsolutiveAntipassive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Antipassive
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#GeographicalVariant
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	geographical variant
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1851
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Description of a specific form used in a certain region as opposed to another form used in another region (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1851)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Possible
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RhetoricalModifier
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in conformance with TIGER
	TODO: check definition
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	added in conformance with TIGER
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Modifier
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubstantiveAdjective
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Substantive adjective
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1394
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An adjective that modifies an implied, but not expressed, noun. When translating such an adjective into English, you must supply the missing noun. (www.southwestern.edu/~carlg/Latin_Web/glossary.html; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1394) (Chiarcos: this seems to pertain to nominalization)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adjective
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ArbitraryControl
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.lexinfo.net/ontology/2.0/lexinfo#ArbitraryControl
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Indicates either the subject or object of the main clause may be the omitted argument of the subclause (http://www.lexinfo.net/ontology/2.0/lexinfo#ArbitraryControl)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Control
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SimplePast
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Past
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	PastTense locates the situation in question prior to the present moment, with no specification on the distance in time (Comrie 1985). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Past)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Past
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Symbol
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Category Residual with Type="Symbol".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In morphosyntactic annotation schemes, a symbol is a single graphical sign that occurs in a written text with a conventionalized meaning but that does not represent a phoneme (like ordinary characters), an orthogaphic sign (punctuation), or a number. (Christian Chiarcos) Symbols such as alphabetic characters can vary for singular and plural (e.g. How many Ps are there in `psychopath'?), and are in this respect like common nouns. In some languages (e.g. Portuguese) such symbols also have gender. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node17.html#recr)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Residual
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ObliquePassive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/ObliquePassive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A Passive in which a basic Oblique nominal assumes the Subject relation in a corresponding nonbasic configuration. Can include locative passives, benefactive passives and instrumental passives. (Klaiman 1991:23) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/ObliquePassive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PassiveVoice
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#VocativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES-recommended case feature
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Vocative case marks a noun whose referent is being addressed. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/glossaryoflinguisticterms/WhatIsVocativeCase.htm 17.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AddresseeRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in conformance with PTB vocative, Bies et al. 1995
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	-VOC (vocative) — marks nouns of address, regardless of their position in the sentence. It is not coindexed to the subject and does not get -TPC when it is sentence-initial. (SQ (NP-VOC Mike) , would (NP-SBJ you) (INTJ please) (VP close (NP the door)) ?) (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SemanticRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AffixedPersonalPronoun
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	affixed personal pronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2221, modelled as a subClassOf PersonalPronoun, clitic pronouns are weak personal pronouns
	subClassOf pronoun (dcif:isA)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Personnal pronoun that is affixed. (MIRACL & LSCA; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2221)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PersonalPronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Acronym
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES category Residual with Type="Acronym".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An acronym is an abbreviation, such as NATO, laser, and ABC, written as the initial letter or letters of words, and pronounced on the basis of this abbreviated written form. Acronyms are used most often to abbreviate names of organizations and long or frequently referenced terms. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acronym 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Residual
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TabooRegister
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	taboo register
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf register (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1996
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Register that expresses a situation that people avoid because it is extremely offensive or embarrassing. (ISO12620; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1996)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#RegisterFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSubjectPerson
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	subject person
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#domain	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Verb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2278 (subject person)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	person for the subject of the verb (in languages with double congruency) (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2278)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasPerson
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ComitativeRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in conformance with TIGER edge labels, this is explicitly not defined as a grammatical case
	TODO: Check whether to be merged with ComitativeCase
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Comitative carries the meaning 'with' or 'accompanied by' (Anderson, Stephen 1985: 186; Pei and Gaynor 1954: 42;Dixon, R. 1972: 12; Gove, et al. 1966: 455). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Comitative) Comitative applies to an animate entity that accompanies a participant of the action. (Dipper et al. 2007, §5.3.12)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SemanticRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InHouseRegister
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	in house register
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf register (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1993
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Register of terms that are company-specific and not readily recognized outside this environment. (ISO12620; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1993)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#RegisterFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubordinatingConjunctionWithoutNegation
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#PositiveSubordinatingConjunction
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Conjunction/Sub_Type="negative" (Romanian, Serbian, Russian) In Romanian, each conjunction requires another mood, so that the diversity may be controlled by subcategorisation rules. The attribute Sub_Type distinguishes among the positive and negative conjunctions, providing means to control verbal double negation, (as in case of the negative pronouns, determiners and adverbs): nici NU am venit, nimeni NU vorbeşte, nici_un tren N-a trecut, nicăieri N-am văzut (MTE v4, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#PositiveSubordinatingConjunction)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubordinatingConjunction
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubessiveCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Subessive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	SubessiveCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location under which another referent exists. It has the meaning of 'under' or 'beneath'. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Subessive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#OptativeMood
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Optative, http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#optativeModality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Optative indicates that the speaker wishes or hopes that the expressed proposition be the case (Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca 1994: 179; Palmer 2001: 204). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Optative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MoodFeature
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#OptativeModality
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ProgressivePassive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/ProgressivePassive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A passive in Irish in which the preposition "at" is used, and a semantic meaning of progressive tense is found (Noonan 1994:280) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/ProgressivePassive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PassiveVoice
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#OpenSquareBracket
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	PTB bracketing guidelines, Santorini 1991
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	[ *LSB* Left square bracket (Santorini 1991)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LeftParentheticalPunctuation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasOwnedNumber
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#NumberFeature
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	owned number
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1930
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Indication concerning the number of the possessed thing. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1930)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasNumber
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PredicativeAdjective
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Adjective with Use="Predicative".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A predicative adjective is one which functions as part of the predicate of a sentence. This means that it is linked to the noun by a verb, often a copula (such as to be). (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adjective 18.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adjective
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ExclamatoryDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Determiner with optional attribute WhType="Exclamatory"
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A exclamatory determiner is used in combination with a Nominal Phrase in order to create an exclamation (a more emphatic form of statement), e.g. "What a lovely colour!", "What a wonderful day this is!" (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/pub/eagles/lexicons/elm_en.ps.gz, p.27, 07.05.07; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentence_(linguistics), 07.05.07)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#WHDeterminer
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ImmediateFuture
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/ImmediateFuture
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	ImmediateFutureTense, also called 'close future', locates the situation in question shortly after the moment of utterance (Dahl 1985:121; Comrie 1985:94; Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca 1994: 244-245). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/ImmediateFuture)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Future
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ImperativeVerb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES FiniteVerb with VerbForm="Imperative"
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An imperative verb is used to express commands, direct requests, and prohibitions. Often, direct use of the imperative mood may appear blunt or even rude, so it is often used with care. Example: "Paul, read that book". (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_mood#Imperative_mood 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FiniteVerb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Indefinite
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES, http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#indefinite
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An entity is specified as indefinite when it refers to a non-particularized individual of the species denoted by the noun. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#indefinite) Indefinite noun phrases are used to refer to entities which are not specific and identifiable in a given context. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definiteness 20.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#DefinitenessFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SourceRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#sourceRole
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A source role instantiates the origin of an event or entity. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#sourceRole)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DirectionRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Impossible
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1866
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	to denote something that cannot be considered as being correct in a given language
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#UsageAndFrequencyFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PoliteSecondPersonPronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES PersonalPronoun with Politeness="Polite". The EAGLES attribute politeness (polite/ familiar) is limited to second-person pronouns. In French, for example, it is possible to treat Polite simply as pragmatic values encoded through other attributes - especially person and number. In languages where there are special polite pronoun forms (e.g. Dutch u and Spanish usted), the additional Politeness attribute is required. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node18.html#oav1p 19.09.06)
	TODO: Politeness as feature rather than a concept.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In several European languages exist special forms of pronouns for polite or respectful reference, e.g. Dutch u and Spanish usted. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node18.html#oav1p 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SecondPersonPronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#WHPrepositionalPhrase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in conformance with PTB bracketing guidelines (Santorini 1991, Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	WHPP|Wh-prepositional phrase. Prepositional phrase containing a wh-determiner, as in by whatever means necessary. (Santorini 1991) WHPP â ´ Wh-prepositional Phrase. Prepositional phrase containing a wh-noun phrase (such as of which or by whose authority) that either introduces a PP gap or is contained by a WHNP. (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PrepositionalPhrase
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ConditionalRealisMood
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	ILPOSTS (Indian languages), http://purl.org/olia/ilposts.owl#Real is restricted to conditional participles, hence probably a subtype of ConditionalMood
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Conditional Mood (modality) with Realis meaning (ILPOSTS)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ConditionalRealisModality
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ConditionalMood
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RaisingSubject
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.lexinfo.net/ontology/2.0/lexinfo#RaisingSubject
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Indicates the syntactic subject of the main clause is in fact the subject of the subclause. The main clause should then be interpreted as being impersonal. (http://www.lexinfo.net/ontology/2.0/lexinfo#RaisingSubject)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Control
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LocativePronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TODO: clarify relationship with pronominal adverb
	adopted from Dzongkha tagset (Chungku et al. 2010)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A Locative pronoun is a pronoun, which locates the object of a noun or place of anything. ་ ན་ གས་ ང་ ་ ག། Nâ[LP] PhÜntsho'ling-lu ShÔ 'Come here at Phuntsholing' (http://panl10n.net/english/Outputs%20Phase%202/CCs/Bhutan/Papers/2007/0701/PartOfSpeech.pdf)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Pronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasOwnerNumber
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	owner number
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES feature for the inherent plural/singular of possessive pronouns and possessive determiners; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1417, does not entail hasNumber (against hasOwnedNumber), because hasNumber applies to agreement information
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The EAGLES-recommended attribute Possessive accounts for the fact that a possessive pronoun or possessive determiner may have two different numbers. This attribute handles the number which is inherent to the possessive form (e.g. Italian "(la) mia", "(la) nostra" as first-person singular and first-person plural) as contrasted with the number it has by virtue of agreeing with a particular noun (e.g. Italian "(la) mia", "(le) mie)". (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node17.html#recc 20.11.06) Indication concerning the number of the person that ownes something. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1417) Inherent plural or singular of possessive pronouns and possessive determiners.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PhysicalAbilitiveModality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3394
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	PhysicalAbilitiveModality indicates that an agent has the physical capacity to perform some action. [Bybee, Perkins and Pagliuca 1994: 192; Palmer 2001: 77]
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AbilitativeModality
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InterrogativeCardinalQuantifier
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	interrogative cardinal numeral
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3018 (interrogativeCardinalNumeral)
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	interrogativeCardinalNumeral: An interrogative/relative word used to ask about quantity.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InterrogativeQuantifier
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AdverbialSubordinateClause
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in conformance with the SFB632 Annotation Guidelines (Dipper et al. 2007)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Subordinate clauses with adverbial function are annotated as ADV, e.g. "Tom sleeps when the sun rises." (Dipper et al. 2007, §4.3.6)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubordinateClause
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InteressiveCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Interessive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	InteressiveCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location between which another referent exists. It has the meaning of 'between'. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Interessive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Nominative
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In nominative-accusative languages, nominative case marks clausal subjects and is applies to nouns in isolation. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/glossaryoflinguisticterms/WhatIsNominativeCase.htm 17.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MalefactiveCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Malefactive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Opposite of BenefactiveCase; used when the marked noun is negatively affected in the clause. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Malefactive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Personal
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	personal
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1946
	subClassOf referentType (dcif:conceptualDomain)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Property that refers to the person. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1946)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ReferentTypeFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ProgressiveAspect
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Progressive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	ProgressiveAspect, also called the continuative or the durative, encodes a single event as an ongoing process. Thus, states cannot generally be encoded with the progressive (Comrie 1976: 32-35; Bybee, Perkins and Pagliuca 1994: 127-139; Payne 1997: 240). An exponent of phasal aspect which expresses a stative situation that holds during the time at which an event is occurring (e. g., He is fixing the fence) (Michaelis 1998:xv). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Progressive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#AspectFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#WHNounPhrase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in conformance with PTB bracketing guidelines (Santorini 1991, Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	WHNP|Wh-noun phrase. Noun phrase containing (among other things) a wh-determiner, as in which book or whose daughter, or consisting of a wh-pronoun like who. (Santorini 1991) WHNP â ´ Wh-noun Phrase. Introduces a clause with an NP gap. May be null (containing the 0 complementizer) or lexical, containing some wh-word, e.g. who, which book, whose daughter, none of which, or how many leopards. (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NounPhrase
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LocativePassive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/LocativePassive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An oblique locative nominal assumes the subject relation. (Klaiman 1991:17) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/LocativePassive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PassiveVoice
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InterallativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Interallative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	InterallativeCase expresses that something is moving toward the region that is in the middle of the referent of the noun it marks. It has the meaning 'towards the middle of'. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Interallative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IterativeAspect
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Iterative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	IterativeAspect, also called repetitives, encodes a number of events of the same type that are repeated on a particular occasion. The time interval which is relevant to the iterative is relatively shorter than in the case of the habitual (Bybee 1985: 150; Bybee, Perkins and Pagliuca 1994: 127). Portrays events repeated on the same occasion (like the iterative knocking on the door) (Bhat 1999: 53) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Iterative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#AspectFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#StrongPersonalPronoun
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	strong personal pronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf personalPronoun (dcif:isA)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1390
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Personal pronoun that can occupy the position after a preposition and/or reinforce a weak personal pronoun. (Eagles; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1390)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PersonalPronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasRegister
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#RegisterFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1988
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Classification indicating the relative level of language individually assigned to a lexeme or term or to a text type. (ISO12620; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1988)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DeclarativeMood
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#declarativeModality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Pertaining to the mood or mode of a verb form or clause such that it predicates a type of (formal) assertion (OED). (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#declarativeModality) Unlike DeclarativeModality, a DeclarativeMood is morphologically marked.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MoodFeature
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DeclarativeModality
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubjunctiveMood
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Subjunctive, http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#subjunctiveModality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The subjunctive is the mood that is minimally marked as opposed to the indicative and that marks a clause as not directly representing an assertion of the speaker. (http://www.uni-erfurt.de/sprachwissenschaft/proxy.php?port=8080&file=lido/servlet/Lido_Servlet Subjunktiv 18.06.07)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MoodFeature
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubjunctiveModality
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CommonlyUsed
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	commonly used
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1984
	subClassOf frequency (dcif:conceptualDomain)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Said of a term that appears frequently. (ISO12620; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1984)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Possible
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ExclamatoryPronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES WHPronoun with Wh-Type="Exclamatory".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An exclamative pronoun is a word which marks an exclamation. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAnExclamative.htm 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#WHPronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DistributiveCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#DistributiveCase
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The distributive case is used on nouns for the meanings of per or each, e.g., Hungarian egyenként/egy, hetenként/hét, ilyenként/ily, kéthetenként/kéthét, rekordonként/rekord, tömbönként/tömb, vércsoportonként/vércsoport In Hungarian it is -nként and expresses the manner when something happens to each member of a set one by one (e.g., fejenként "per head", esetenként "in some case"), or the frequency in time (hetenként "once a week", tízpercenként "every ten minutes"). In the Finnish language, this adverb type is rare, even rarer in the singular. Its ending is -ttain/-ttäin. The basic meaning is "separately for each". For example, maa ("country") becomes maittain for an expression like Laki ratifioidaan maittain ("The law is ratified separately in each country"). It can be used to distribute the action to frequent points in time, e.g., päivä (day) has the plural distributive päivittäin (each day). It can mean also "in (or with) regard to the (cultural) perspective" when combined with a word referring to an inhabitant (-lais-). Frequently Finns (suomalaiset) say that suomalaisittain tuntuu oudolta, että, or "in the Finnish perspective, it feels strange that". (http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#DistributiveCase, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributive_case)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CountNumber
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#CountNumber
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	MULTEXT-East feature Number="count" (Nouns in Serbian, Macedonian, Bulgarian), e.g., Bulgarian яка/як, язовира/язовир, яда/яд, юргана/юрган, юбилея/юбилей, ъгъла/ъгъл (http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#CountNumber)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#NumberFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ErgativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TDS Ontology
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In ergative-absolutive languages, the ergative case identifies the subject of a transitive verb. In such languages, the ergative case is typically marked (most salient), while the absolutive case is unmarked. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#ergativeCase with reference to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ergative_case).
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NonSeparable
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES; note that UbyPos extends separability to particles
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Non-separable verbs are not composed of a verb stem and a separable affix. (cf. SeparabilityFeature: Separable)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SeparabilityFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Sequel
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TODO: provide definition
	added in accordance with ILPOSTS (for Indian languages), http://purl.org/olia/ilposts.owl#Sequel
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Adopted from ILPOSTS for Indian languages. No definition or examples provided: Distance=Sequel (http://purl.org/olia/ilposts.owl#Sequel)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ProximityFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DistinctiveParticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	distinctive particle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf particle (dcif:isA)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2228
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	distinctive particle (MIRACL & LSCA; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2228)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Particle
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Script
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1855
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Set of graphic characters used for the written form of one or more languages.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#OrthographicEntity
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PreferredEvaluative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3416
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An evaluative property of a noun that indicates the speaker regards the person or object being referred to with favor or admiration.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#EvaluativeFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ObliqueCase
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	oblique case
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1336; in EAGLES applied to non-subject pronouns in English and Dutch
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Case that is used when a noun is the object of a verb or a proposition, except for nominative and vocative case. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1336)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FusedPrepositionPronoun
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3009
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	word resulting from the aggregation of a preposition and a pronoun
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Preposition
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Pronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSubordType
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#domain	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubordinatingConjunction
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	remodelled within the hierarchy
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#GerundVerbPhrase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Ancorra, http://purl.org/olia/ancorra.owl#GerundChunk
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	VGNN Gerunds A verb chunk having a gerund will be annotated as VGNN. For example, h18a. sharAba ((pInA_VM))_VGNN sehata ke liye hAnikAraka hE. 'liquor' 'drinking' 'heath' 'for' 'harmful' 'is' “Drinking (liquor) is bad for health” h19a. mujhe rAta meM ((khAnA_VM))_VGNN acchA lagatA hai 'to me' 'night' 'in' 'eating' 'good' 'appeals' “I like eating at night” h20a. ((sunane_VM meM_PSP))_VGNN saba kuccha acchA lagatA hE 'listening' 'in' 'all' 'things' 'good' 'appeal' 'is' (Akshar Bharati, Dipti Misra Sharma, Lakshmi Bai, Rajeev Sangal (2006), AnnCorra : Annotating Corpora. Guidelines For POS And Chunk Annotation For Indian Languages, Tech. Rep., L anguage Technologies Research Centre IIIT, Hyderabad, version of 15-12-2006, http://ltrc.iiit.ac.in/tr031/posguidelines.pdf)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NonfiniteVerbPhrase
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NonInversePassive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#disjointWith	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InverseVoice
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Passive Unlike the GOLD definition, Passive is often not clearly distinguished from Inverse: According to Givón (1988), Inverse is characterized by obligatory realization of the suppressed agent, whereas the realization of the agent in a passive construction is optional (or impossible). This restrictive definition of passive does, however, conflict with the use of the term "passive" for European languages. Then, English and German "Passive" would be Inverses. Therefore, Inverse is a subconcept of Passive here. Givón's original Passive is NonInversePassive.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An agent-demoting voice construction where the realization of the demoted agent is not obligatory (against Inverse). In terminological systems that distinguish "InverseVoice" from "Passive" (e.g., Givon, 1988), this is the "Passive" concept. (Ch. Chiarcos) Associated with actions performed on the subject by an unspecified agent. (McIntosh 1984:108) Refers to the category of verb forms, typically identifies with a specific morphological marking, that encode the derived diatheses in which the agent role is not linked with a subject noun phrase (Shibatani 1995:7) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Passive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PassiveVoice
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CausalMood
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Nowak (1996)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In Inuktitut, causality is expressed by verbal inflection. Causal mood signifies causal relationships in a sentence. (Nowak 1996, p.39) Elke Nowak (1996), Transforming the images: Ergativity and transitivity in Inuktitut (Eskimo). Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MoodFeature
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CausalModality
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TenseMarkingAuxiliary
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from Sajjad (2007) for Urdu, cf. http://purl.org/olia/urdu.owl#TenseAuxiliary
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An auxiliary that marks exclusively tense, e.g., in Urdu: Auxiliaries: Based on the syntactic nature of Urdu, auxiliaries are divided into two categories. Aspectual auxiliaries always occur after main verb of the sentence. Tense auxiliaries are used to show the time of the action. They occurred at the end of the verb phrase. (Sajjad 2007). In Urdu, the auxiliary gā indicates future tense when it follows a verb in the subjunctive form. (http://purl.org/olia/emille.owl#GaAuxiliary)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#StrictAuxiliaryVerb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NominalPredicate
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in conformance with SFB632 annotation guidelines (Dipper et al., 2007)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A nominal predicate (noun or adjective), either with or without copula. The term nominal predicate may be used for the complements of further copulative verbs (cf. small clauses), e.g. "consider", "call", etc. (Dipper et al. 2007, §4.3.5)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Predicate
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InterterminativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Interminative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	InterterminativeCase expresses the notion of something moving into the middle of the referent of the noun it marks, but not through it. It has the meaning 'into the middle of'. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Interminative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NearFuture
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/NearFuture, classified as Future here
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	adopted from GOLD, no definition given there (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/NearFuture)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Future
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#OpenBracket
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	open bracket
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2082
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Punctuation that is represented graphically as [ (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2082)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LeftParentheticalPunctuation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TerminativeAspect
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Terminative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Denotes the termination of an event (Bhat 1999: 92). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Terminative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#AspectFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Hyphen
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	hyphen
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2077
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Punctuation that is graphically presented as "-". (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2077)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SentenceMedialPunctuation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ing
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Introduced in accordance with EAGLES, where 'Ing' is suggested as a cover term for the Gerund-Participle-Merger in English. This is, however, a language-specific phenomenon and should instead be represented by multiple inheritance from OLiA Reference Model concepts.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	English verb forms ending in '-ing' that represent either Gerunds or Participles.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Gerund
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Participle
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ImperfectiveAspect
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES, http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#imperfectiveAspect, http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Imperfective
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The Imperfective aspect is an aspect that expresses an event or state, with respect to its internal structure, instead of expressing it as a simple whole. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/glossaryoflinguisticterms/WhatIsImperfectiveAspect.htm 17.11.06) The imperfective aspects ... do not view the situation as bounded, but rather as ongoing in either a durative, continuative or habitual sense (Bybee 1985:21) (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#imperfectiveAspect) A viewpoint aspect which encodes the speaker’s lack of attention to the endpoints of the situation referred to. Imperfective aspect is the prototypical mode of presentation for states (Michaelis 1998:xiv). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Imperfective)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#AspectFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IllativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Illative; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1303
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	IllativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location into which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'into' (Lyons 1968: 299; Gove, et al. 1966: 1126; Crystal 1985: 152). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Illative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ExpansionVariation
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1850
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Description of the kind of variation between full and abbreviated forms.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#Relation
	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#LexicalRelation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#OrdinalAdjective
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	ordinal adjective
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RelationalAdjective
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf adjective (dcif:isA)
	DEPRECATED: The DCR definition and this term are incorrect. "Ordinal adjective" entered ISOcat from MULTEXT-East, where it was originally applied to relational adjectives (Slovene, Resian, Ukrainian, Czech). "Ordinal adjective" is a mistranslation from Slovene _vrstni pridevniki_ that should be properly rendered in English as "relational adjective" (Derzhanski and Kotsyba 2009). However, the Macedonian MULTEXT v.4 guidelines use this category for ordinal numerals. Due to its inherent ambiguity, this category is to be avoided.
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1338
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Adjective expressing a numeric ranking. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1338) Cf. "second", "next", "last"
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adjective
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#VerbalComplex
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In a German clause, the finite verb can appear in three different positions: verb-second, verb-initial, and verb-final. Only in verb-final clauses the verb complex consisting of the finite verb and non-finite verbal elements forms a unit. The discontinuous positioning of the verbal elements in verb-first and verb-second clauses is the traditional reason for structuring German clauses into fields. The positions of the verbal elements form the Satzklammer (sentence bracket) which divides the sentence into a Vorfeld (initial field), a Mittelfeld (middle field), and a Nachfeld (final field). The Vorfeld and the Mittelfeld are divided by the linke Satzklammer (left sentence bracket), which is the finite verb, the rechte Satzklammer (right sentence bracket) is the verb complex between the Mittelfeld and the Nachfeld. (Telljohann et al. 2009, p.13) The Verbkomplex is a sequence of verb forms. In verb-second and verb-first clauses it consists of one or more non-finite elements or - depending on the verb - of a separable prefix. In verb-final clauses it also contains the finite verb. The rule for the linear order in general is: right determines left. If there is a finite verb in the verb complex, it is usually the right-most element. (Telljohann et al. 2009, p.15)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#TopologicalField
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PreHodiernalPast
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/PreHodiernalPast, classified as absolute tense
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	PreHodiernalPastTense locates the situation in question before that of a contrasting HodiernalPastTense. According to Bybee, Perkins, Pagliuca 1994: 98. this category must be defined relative to a HodiernalPastTense. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/PreHodiernalPast)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AbsoluteTense
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AgentiveVerb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from Dzongkha tagset (Chungku et al. 2010)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An agentive verb marks the semantic role of agent or the doer of an action. Example: ་ ་ ས་ ་ ་ བསད་ ག། Dorji-gi jele sänu 'Dorji killed the cat' (http://panl10n.net/english/Outputs%20Phase%202/CCs/Bhutan/Papers/2007/0701/PartOfSpeech.pdf)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MainVerb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Initial
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES, reimplemented as subhierarchy of CoordinatingConjunction
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	When two distinct words occur, as in German "weder...noch...", then the first is given the Initial value. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node18.html#oav1av 17.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CoordTypeFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RaisableArgument
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:30
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	from http://lemon-model.net/lemon#RaisableArgument, deprecated because this is just a shorthand for Raising and SyntacticArgument
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PlaceNoun
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:31
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3857
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	noun expressing a location, equivalent to ProperNoun and hasSemanticRole some LocationRole
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ProperNoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Text
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	text
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1847
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Series of sentences expressed in a natural language. (Gil Francopoulo; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1847)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#OrthographicEntity
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ForceRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#forceRole
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A force role is one in which the instantiator (the “force”) exerts some degree of energy which initiates (or impacts on) the execution of the event. In contrast to an agent, an instantitor of a force may be an inanimate entity, such as a climactic condition. The non-controlling entity instigating a Process (=Dynamism or Change) (Dik, 1997:118) (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#forceRole)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ActorMacroRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DeclarativePunctuation
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2086
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Punctuation used at the end a declarative sentence.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SentenceFinalPunctuation
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DeclarativeModality
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InterminativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Interminative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	'into in(side of)'. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Interminative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ApplicativeVoice
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3846
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	voice which promotes an oblique argument of a verb to the core patient argument and indicates the oblique role within the meaning of the verb
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#VoiceFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IndirectObject
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#R, http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1310
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An indirect object is a grammatical relation that is one means of expressing the semantic role of goal and other similar roles. It is proposed for languages in which the role is distinct from the direct object and the oblique object on the basis of multiple independent syntactic or morphological criteria, such as the following: (i) Having a particular case marking, commonly dative (ii) Governing an agreement affix on the verb, such as person or number (iii) Being distinct from oblique relations in that it may be relativized A noun, pronoun, or noun phrase indicating the recipient or beneficiary of the action of a verb and its direct object (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1310) Third argument of a ditransitive verb. Ditransitive recipient (Siewierska 2004:57). (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#R)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SyntacticObject
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Elision
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	elision
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1277
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The omission of a syllable or vowel at the beginning or end of a word, esp. when a word ending with a vowel is next to one beginning with a vowel. (www.wordreference.com/English/definition.asp?en=elision; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1277)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#PhonologicalProcess
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Imperfect
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	imperfect
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf grammaticalTense (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1304
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Verb tense that refers to action in the past that is incomplete or ongoing. (www.southwestern.edu/~carlg/Latin_Web/glossary.html; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1304)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#StillPresent
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RelativePresent
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/RelativePresent
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	RelativePresentTense locates the situation in question simultaneously with some contextually determined temporal reference point. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/RelativePresent)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RelativeTense
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PathRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in accordance with TIGER way (directional modifier)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	added in accordance with TIGER way (directional modifier)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DirectionRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#VocativeExpression
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	vocative expression
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/tcodex.owl#VocativeForm
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An expression referring to a person to which the utterance is addressed, e.g. Old High German "truhtin", "meistar" or "fater". The vocative expression typically occurs outside of the clause and not in an argument position selected by the predicate. (Petrova 2008, see http://purl.org/olia/tcodex.owl)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#DiscourseEntity
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Homonym
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	homonym
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1301
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Word that sounds the same and is written the same as another word but is different in meaning.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#Relation
	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#LexicalRelation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DigitNumeral
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1935
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Numeral expressed by Arabic digits.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Numeral
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#String
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Fragment
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	PTB bracketing guidelines, Santorini 1991, Bies et al. 1995
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	FRAG marks those portions of text that appear to be clauses, but lack too many essential elements for the exact structure to be easily determined (e.g., answers to questions). Predicate argument structure therefore cannot be extracted from FRAGs. (Bies et al. 1995) Sentence fragments that end with sentence- nal punctuation like Not even an earthquake. should not be bracketed as S, but only with the highest appropriate label|in this case, NP. Do not attach such fragments to the preceding or following full sentence. (Santorini 1991)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#Constituent
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#imports	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl
	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Oct. 2005 created by Christian Chiarcos 2006-2008 maintained by Christian Chiarcos and Angelika Adam since 2008 maintained by Christian Chiarcos 10/01/08 updated by Christian Chiarcos 10/01/25 added SyntacticUnit categorization (from GOLD [http://www.linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2008] and EAGLES recommendations [http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/segsasg1/node29.html#SECTION00052000000000000000]) 10/01/28 removed all owl:disjointWith and owl:complementOf, these are language-specific and have to be represented in a separate language model. 10/02/17 extended SyntacticUnit categorization in accordance with the TDS ontologies (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl) Christian 10/02/18 adopted TIGER edge labels as syntactic role and semantic role 10/03/11 manual restructuring of OWL file begun 10/03/23 morphosyntactic classes revised 10/03/24 CaseFeature extended by TDS grammaticalCase, GOLD CaseValue and DCR case features DefinitenessFeature checked against TDS definitenessProperty and DCR (missing in GOLD) DegreeFeature checked against DCR (missing in GOLD and TDS) TenseFeature extended in accordance with TDS tenseProperty and GOLD TenseValue (DCR not yet) GenderFeature checked against TDS case and GOLD GenderValue (DCR not yet) SemanticRole extended in accordance with TDS semanticRoleProperty (missing in GOLD, merged with grammatical case there) PersonFeature checked and extended against GOLD and TDS MoodFeature extended in accordance with TDS modalityProperty and GOLD MoodValue AspectFeature extended in accordance with TDS aspectProperty and GOLD AspectValue Habitual remodelled as Aspect 10/03/25 SyntacticRole checked and extended against GOLD syntacticRole (properties) and DCR syntacticCategory, modifyingRelation VoiceFeature extended against GOLD VoiceValue and TDS grammaticalVoice hierarchically structured restructuring concluded 10/04/06 extended InflectionType, added Countability and Valency as features and properties (in accordance with Sampson (1995), see susa.owl 10/04/08 extensions with respect to constituent types, syntactic relations and semantic roles in accordance with Dipper et al. (2007), see sfb632.owl 10/04/13 extension wrt. the morphosyntactic profile of the DCR (ISOcat, www.isocat.org) 10/04/14 validation, PossessiveFeature removed 10/04/15-18 additions in accordance to the PTB Bracketing Guidelines (Santorini 1991, Bies et al. 1995) 10/11/26 introduced NounHeadedPhrase for improved compatibility with dependency parsing schemes (e.g., Connexor) 10/11/29 added categories for topological fields in German (as used in TüBa-D/Z) 10/12/02 added DeterminerPhrase, ForeignPhrase, subclasses of ExpletivePronoun (TüBa-D/Z) 11/07/29 replaced url http://purl.org/olia with purl http://purl.olcl.org/olia 11/07/31-11/08/04 linking with MULTEXT-East (http://nl.ijs.si/ME/owl/multext-east.owl = http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl) Clitic deprecated (replaced by CliticElement because of the ambiguity of the category in MULTEXT-East and ISOcat) additions: hasProximity, Distal, Proximal, CliticElement, CliticDefiniteArticle, SpecificArticle, CliticSpecificArticle, hasSpecificity, Specific, Nonspecific, Cliticization, ElementWithClitic, ElementWithoutClitic, ElementDemandingClitic, DistributiveCase, FactiveCase, DirectCase, FormalCase, MultiplicativeCase, TemporalisCase, ElativeDegree, CountNumber, AspectParticle, SubjunctiveParticle, VerbalParticle, LightVerb, VerbalAdverb, NegativeAdverb, ModifierAdverb, AdjectivalAdverb, NonspecificPronoun, DeterminalPronoun, AttributivePronoun, EmphaticDeterminer, NegativeDeterminer, UniquitiveDeterminer, PossessiveArticle, hasConjunct, hasWordConjunct, hasSentenceConjunct, RepetitiveCoordinatingConjunction, SubordinatingConjunctionWithNegation, SubordinatingConjunctionWithoutNegation, RelationalAdjective, PossessiveAdjective, NonreducedInflection, ReducedInflection, CollectiveNumeral, hasNumeralAgreement, DualQuantifier, PaucalQuantifier, SingularQuantifier, PluralQuantifier, Fraction, ApproximateNumeral, MultipleNumeral, ProQuantifier, InterrogativeQuantifier, IndefiniteQuantifier, DemonstrativeQuantifier, RelativeQuantifier, QuotativeVerb, QuotativeMood, NonNegated, Diminuitive, Human, AbbreviatedPronoun, FixedExpression, Adjectival, Typo, Verbal, hasObjectNumber, hasNumeralForm, ExistentialParticle 11/08/04 eliminated redundancy of olia-top:SyntacticRelation and olia:SyntacticRelation SubordType, CoordType deprecated, remodelled as subconcepts of Sub/CoordinatingConjunction 11/08/05 validation 11/08/11 VoiceParticle (from Portuguese EAGLES) 11/08/12 linking with T-CODEX (Old High German) VocativeExpression, Fronting, ConditionRole, HangingTopic (for Old High German, T-CODEX) CausalAdverb deprecated (= Adverb and hasSemanticRole some CauseRole) DeclarativeSentence = Sentence and hasMood some DeclarativeMood PresentParticiple (= Sentence and hasTense some Present) PastParticiple (= Sentence and hasTense some Past) 11/08/12-15 linking with ILPOSTS (for Indian languages) added PurposiveCase, PurposiveAspect, DistributivePronoun, ConditionalParticiple, ConditionalRealisMood, ConditionalIrrealisMood, PresumptiveMood, Sequel, AbilitativeMood, SecondHonorific, SecondNonHonorific, hasEmphasis, Emphatic, NonEmphatic, SimpleAspect EmphaticDeterminer, EmphaticPronoun deprecated CausalMood (from Nowak 1996, for Inuktitut) MannerAdverb (= Adverb and hasSemanticRole some MannerRole) {introduced as deprecated} LocationAdverb (= Adverb and hasSemanticRole some LocationRole) {introduced as deprecated} HabitualMood (= HabitualAspect) 11/08/15 olia_top:PhonologicalProcess introduced (reorganization of MorphologicalProcess) 11/08/15 linking with Ancorra and IIIT tagset (for Indian languages) GerundVerbPhrase, SpatiotemporalNoun, InfinitiveVerbPhrase, EchoWord, Composition Intensifier 11/08/15 linking with Urdu tagset (Sajjad 2007) TitleNoun, UnitNoun, AspectMarkingAuxiliary, TenseMarkingAuxiliary, Date added 11/08/16 linking with EMILLE Urdu tagset (Hardie 2003) AdjectivalParticle, ModalityMarkingAdverb, OpenQuote, CloseQuote, ContrastiveParticle, EmphaticParticle, MultiplicativeMarker, ExclusiveEmphaticParticle, InclusiveEmphaticParticle, ReflexivePossessiveDeterminer, Izafat, RelativeAdjective added ContrastiveEmphaticParticle (= ContrastiveParticle and EmphaticParticle) 11/08/16 linking with Dzongkha tagset (Chungku et al. 2010) added AspirationalVerb, AgentiveVerb, TenseMarkingParticle, NonAgentiveVerb, LocativePronoun, NominalNumber, CaseMarker, PeriodicAdjective, CharacteristicAdjective, DifferentialPronoun, NominalQuantifier HonorificVerb, HonorificCommonNoun added (=> Honorificity to be remodelled) 13/03/03 linking with Uby Pos annotation model (http://www.ukp.tu-darmstadt.de/data/lexical-resources/uby/) added GivenName, FamilyName, comments for PersonalPronoun, Separability 13/03/03 partial "hasFeature Self"-modeling for ...Feature concepts: not inferable through Fact++ or Hermit, though, hence incomplete 13/03/04 linking with Uby Pos annotation model (http://www.ukp.tu-darmstadt.de/data/lexical-resources/uby/) Contraction, Phraseme, LexicalUnit (as generalization over Phraseme and Lexeme), Initialism 13/03/04 olia-top:XYFeature olia:hasXY Self for most XYFeatures 13/06/24 additions from ISOcat morphosyntactic profile: FusedPrepositionPronoun, ElativeNoun, InterrogativeMultiplicativeQuantifier, FocusMarker, AdjutativeVoice, AversiveCase 13/06/25 additions from ISOcat morphosyntactic profile: VisualEvidentiality, OtherSourceEvidentiality, DeductiveEvidentiality, Exclusive, Inclusive, Homonym, Homophone, CircumstantialVoice 13/06/27 ISOcat additions: MannerNoun (deprecated), QuestionWord (extended to be a generalization over InterrogativeXY, deprecated), GeneralizationWord, EpistemicPossibilityModality, DebitiveMood, InchoativeAspect, PresentativePronoun, IndefiniteCardinalQuantifier, NumeralBoth (deprecated), GraphicalSeparator, Impossible, Possible, EpistemicNecessityModality, TemporallyDefinedUsage, PrepositionalAdverb, DeclarativePunctuation, Multal, ObligativeModality, RomanNumeral, DigitNumeral, Script, ParticleAdverb (deprecrated), ApplicativeVoice, EvaluativeModality, PlaceNoun (deprecated), String [generalized as orthographical anchor point for RomanNumeral] 13/06/28 ISOcat additions: Masdar, Ideophone, DeficientVerb (deprecated), IndefiniteMultiplicativeQuantifier, PermissiveModality, WeakObligativeModality, ExistentialPronoun (deprecated), InstrumentNoun, PhysicalAbilitiveModality, MedioPassiveVoice, InterrogativeCardinalQuantifier, CompletiveAspect, PseudopassiveVoice, LetterNumeral, ContextualVariation, Homograph, CollectivePronoun, PossessiveRelativePronoun, ExpansionVariation, CausativeVoice, Augmentative, FusedPronounAuxiliary, AntiCausativeVoice, StatusConstructus, PreferredEvaluative, PejorativeEvaluative, CommissiveForce, ActionalForce, VolitiveForce hasEvaluativeFeature (for ISOcat PreferredEvaluative and PejorativeEvaluative), HortativeModality (from GOLD, missing in the corresponding ISOcat export) disentangled Modality and Mood: for every Mood, created a corresponding Modality as superclass; XYMood is subconcept of Mood and XYModality concept, hasMood only for Mood, hasModality for Modality 16/04/18 selected French labels for the Bambara Reference Corpus (BRC) added OnomatopoeticWord, QualitativeVerb, PredicativeMarker OWL/DL validation 16/08/29 added Frame, hasMovementFeature, Control and Raising for compliance with lexinfo 17/06/26 fixed occasional type errors at owl:deprecated 18/01/08 added Converb (for Eastern Armenian National Corpus) Christian Chiarcos chiarcos@informatik.uni-frankfurt.de
	TODO: simplify {Interrogative,Indefinite,...}/{Cardinal,Multiplicative,...}Quantifier dichothomies In subsequent versions, however, orthographical definitions should be handled with existing ontologies specializing on the description on language, e.g., lexvo check gerundive vs. gerund update GOLD linking
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	OLiA Reference Model for Morphology, Morphosyntax and Syntax (originally based on the EAGLES recommendations, with modifications in accordance to DCR (ISOcat, June 2013), TDS ontology, GOLD v.03, the SFB 632 annotation guidelines, the MULTEXT-East ontology and various annotation schemes)
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Suffix
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	suffix
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1395
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Affix added at the end of the word to change its meaning or part of speech. (Sue Ellen Wright + Gil Francopoulo; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1395)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Affix
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ContablativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Contablative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	ContablativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location from near which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'from near'. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Contablative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#WordOrderInverse
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	PTB bracketing guidelines (Santorini 1991, Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	SINV|Inverted declarative sentence, i.e. one in which the subject follows the verb. See Section 5.19. (Santorini 1991) The SINV label is used for subject-auxiliary inversion in the case of negative inversion, conditional inversion, locative inversion, and some topicalizations. ... SINV â ´ Inverted declarative sentence, i.e. one in which the subject follows the tensed verb or modal. (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SyntacticConstruction
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DialectRegister
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	dialect register
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1990
	subClassOf register (dcif:conceptualDomain)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Register that is specific to a dialect. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1990)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#RegisterFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TranslativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Translative, http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1406
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	TranslativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun, or the quality of the adjective, that it marks is the result of a process of change (Lyons 1968: 299301, Gove, et al. 1966: 813,2429, Sebeok 1946: 17, Hakulinen 1961: 70). X along, across Y. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Translative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#EmphaticPronoun
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	emphatic pronoun
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:32
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1941
	DEPRECATED: shorthand for Pronoun and hasEmphasis some Emphatic
	subClassOf pronoun (dcif:isA)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Pronoun marked to show its importance. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1941)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Pronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DubitiveMood
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Dubitive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	DubitiveMood indicates a speaker's doubt or uncertainty about a proposition (Palmer 2001). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Dubitive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MoodFeature
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DubitiveModality
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PejorativeEvaluative
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3380
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An evaluative property of a noun that indicates the speaker regards the person or object being referred to with distaste, contempt, or displeasure [Valentine 2001: 190-193].
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#EvaluativeFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InessiveCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Inessive, http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1311
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	InessiveCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location within which another referent exists. It has the meaning of 'within' or 'inside' (Lyons 1968: 299; Gove, et al. 1966: 1156; Crystal 1985: 156). X in Y. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Inessive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Izafat
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	izafat
	ezafe
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2999
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	from the EMILLE tagset for Urdu, http://purl.org/olia/emille.owl#Izafat, cf. http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#GenitiveCase for the modelling of the Izafat in the Farsi MULTEXT-East.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The izāfat (pronounced as a shorter form of –ē–) is an enclitic of Persian origin which is used in Farsi and neighboring languages. In Urdu, it can be considered a preposition under certain circumstances: it links two nouns in a possessive relationship, although the phrase thus produced may often have a different meaning to a phrase produced with the native Urdu postposition kā. However, the izāfat may also join a noun to an adjective, in which case it is not so clearly accurate to describe it as a preposition parallel to the prepositions in European languages for which the EAGLES guidelines were compiled. A better way to treat izāfat is in the context of the Unique category of miscellaneous one-member wordclasses, discussed below. (Hardie 2003, http://purl.org/olia/emille.owl#Izafat) enclitic morpheme used to form noun phrases and that can denote possession, can form apposition or can join adjectives to nouns. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2999)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Unique
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Multal
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	multal number
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3327
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Multal is a number property that refers to a large number of individuals.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#NumberFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RepetitiveCoordinatingConjunction
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#RepetitiveCoordinatingConjunction
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Conjunction/Coord_Type="repetit" (Romanian). In Romanian, there are three kinds of conjunctions depending on their usage: as such or together with other conjunctions or adverbs: (1) simple, between conjuncts: Ion ori Maria (John or Mary); (2) repetitive, before each conjunct: fie Ion fie Maria fie... (either John or Mary or...) (3) correlative, before a conjoined phrase, it requires specific coordinators between conjuncts: atât mama cât şi tata (both mother and father). (MTE v4, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#RepetitiveCoordinatingConjunction)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CoordinatingConjunction
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Fraction
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	fraction
	fractional numeral
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#FractalNumeral, http://purl.org/olia/urdu.owl#FractionalNumeral
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	e.g., يک‌چهارمِ/يک‌چهار يک‌پنجمِ/يک‌پنج (fa, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#FractalNumeral)
	Numeral/Form="fractional" (Romanian) In traditional Romanian grammars, FractionalNumeral refers to expressions like treime-one third. (MTE v4, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#FractalNumeral)
	e.g., treisprezecimea/treisprezecime, treisprezecimi/treisprezecime, treisprezecimii/treisprezecime, treisprezecimile/treisprezecime, treisprezecimilor/treisprezecime, unsprezecimea/unsprezecime, unsprezecimi/unsprezecime, unsprezecimii/unsprezecime, unsprezecimile/unsprezecime (ro, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#FractalNumeral)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Numeral
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ThirdObviative
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/ThirdObviative, modelled here as a subconcept of Third
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Obviative refers to one or more non-participants that are in some way further removed from the speaker than other non-particpants. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/ThirdObviative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Third
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ParticleAdverb
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:33
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1917
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	merely a shorthand for the intersection of Adverb and Particle, hence deprecated
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Word that is both an adverb and a particle.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Particle
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adverb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SpatiotemporalNoun
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	spatio-temporal noun
	location noun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from Ancorra, http://purl.org/olia/ancorra.owl#SpatiotemporalNoun
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Noun denoting spatial and temporal expressions "A tag NST has been included to cover an important phenomenon of Indian languages. Certain expressions such as 'Upara' (above/up), 'nIce' (below) 'pahale' (before), 'Age' (front) etc are content words denoting time and space. These expressions, however, are used in various ways. For example, 5.1.2.1 These words often occur as temporal or spatial arguments of a verb in a given sentence taking the appropriate vibhakti (case marker): h3. vaha Upara so rahA thA . 'he' 'upstairs' 'sleep' 'PROG' 'was' “He was sleepign upstairs”. h4. vaha pahale se kamare meM bEThA thA . 'he' 'beforehand' 'from' ' room' 'in' 'sitting' 'was' “He was sitting in the room from beforehand” h5. tuma bAhara bETho 'you' 'outside' 'sit' “You sit outside”. Apart from functioning like an argument of a verb, these elements also modify another noun taking postposition 'kA'. h6. usakA baDZA bhAI Upara ke hisse meM rahatA hE 'his' 'elder' 'brother' 'upstairs' 'of' 'portion' 'in' 'live' 'PRES' “His elder brother lives in the upper portion of the house”. 5.1.2.2 Apart from occuring as a nominal expression, they also occur as a part of a postposition along with 'ke'. For example, h7. ghaDZe ke Upara thAlI rakhI hE. 'pot' 'of' 'above' 'plate' 'kept' 'is' The plate is kept on the pot”. h8. tuma ghara ke bAhara bETho 'you' 'home' 'of' 'outside' 'sit' “You sit outside the house”. 'Upara' and 'bAhara' are parts of complex postpositions 'ke Upara' and 'ke bAhara' in (h6) and (h7) respectively which can be translated into English prepositions 'on' and 'outside'. For tagging such words, one possible option is to tag them according to their syntactic function in the given context. For example in 5.2.2 (h7) above, the word 'Upara' is occurring as part of a postposition or a relation marker. It can, therefore, be marked as a postposition. Similarly, in 5.2.1. (h3) and (h6) above, it is a noun, therefore, mark it as a noun and so on. Alternatively, since these words are more like nouns, as is evident from 5.2.1 above they can be tagged as nouns in all there occurrences. The same would apply to 'bAhAra' (outside) in examples examples (h4), (h5) and (h8). However, if we follow any of the above approaches we miss out on the fact that this class of words is slightly different from other nouns. These are nouns which indicate 'location' or 'time'. At the same time, they also function as postpositions in certain contexts. Moreover, such words, if tagged according to their syntactic function, will hamper machine learning. Considering their special status, it was considered whether to introduce a new tag, NST, for such expressions. The following five possibilities were discussed : a) Tag both (h5) & (h8) as NN b) Tag both (h5) & (h8) as NST c) Tag (h5) as NN & (h8) as NST d) Tag (h5) as NST & (h8) as PSP e) Tag (h5) as NN & (h8) as PSP After considering all the above, the decision was taken in favour of (b). The decision was primarily based on the following observations: (i) 'bAhara' in both (h5) and (h8) denotes the same expression (place expression 'outside') (ii) In both (h5) and (h8), 'bAhara' can take a vibhakti like a noun ( bAhara ko bETho, ghara ke bAhara ko bETho) (iii) If a single tag is kept for both the usages, the decision making for annotators would also be easier. Therefore, a new tag NST is introduced for such expressions. The tag NST will be used for a finite set of such words in any language. For example, Hindi has Age (front), pIche (behind), Upara (above/upstairs), nIce (below/down), bAda (after), pahale (before), andara (inside), bAhara (outside) etc." (Akshar Bharati, Dipti Misra Sharma, Lakshmi Bai, Rajeev Sangal (2006), AnnCorra : Annotating Corpora. Guidelines For POS And Chunk Annotation For Indian Languages, Tech. Rep., L anguage Technologies Research Centre IIIT, Hyderabad, version of 15-12-2006, http://ltrc.iiit.ac.in/tr031/posguidelines.pdf)
	NLOC Noun Location This is an entirely new tag introduced to cover an important phenomenon of Indian Languages. Words like 'Age', 'upara', 'pahele', 'bAda', etc. are used in various ways in Hindi. 1. They act as a postposition along with 'ke' e.g. ghade ke upara thAlI rakhI HE. ("pot" "on" "plate" "kept" "is") Here 'ke upara' is a post position which is the direct equivalent of the English preposition 'on'. 2. They also act as adverbs. e.g. tuma upara jAo. ("You" "up" "go") Here 'upara' is an adverbial of place. 3. These words also take post positions themselves and so in some sense behave like nouns. e.g. vaHa upara se AyA. ("He" "above" "from" "came") 4. As pointed out in 3. above, these words take postpositions and act as arguments of the verb in the sentence. And they also take a post position to join with a another noun. So in that sense also they behave like nouns. e.g. upara kA HissA ("above" "of" "portion") To tag such words one option is to tag them according to the category to which they belong in the given sentence. For example in 1. above, the word is occurring as a postposition so can be marked as a postposition. In example 2. above, it is an adverb so can be marked as an adverb and so on. But we feel that these words are more like nouns as is evident from 3. and 4. above, and also if we consider for examples, 'aage', 'upara', etc. as places which are in front, up, etc then we can tag them as nouns. But these are not pure nouns. They are nouns which indicate a location or time. These also function as adverbs or prepositions in a context. So a new tag NLOC is introduced for such words. This tag will cater to a finite set of such words. set: (Age, piche, upara, nIce, bAda, pahele) ("front", "behind", "above", "below", "before") Such words if tagged according to their syntactic function, it will hamper machine learning. So a single tag, NLOC has been devised for such words which indicate location and time. e.g., (upara, Age, pahele, bAda) (IIIT (2007), A Part of Speech Tagger for Indian Languages (POS tagger), Tagset developed at IIIT - Hyderabad after consultations with several institutions through two workshops. available under http://shiva.iiit.ac.in/SPSAL2007/iiit_tagset_guidelines.pdf)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CommonNoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ConditionalParticiple
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from ILPOSTS for Indian languages
	TODO: check whether this could be modelled as Participle and hasMood some ConditionalMood
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	e.g. Bengali বুঝলে (bujhle) from বোঝা (bojha) "to understand" (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E0%A6%AC%E0%A7%8B%E0%A6%9D%E0%A6%BE)
	[In Bengali, t]he Conditional Participle is widely used to convey "if a certain action [pertaining to the parent verb] is done,...". The logic is: "in the case or condition of a certain action being done". Being impersonal, without regard for the doer of the action that caused the condition, it is not declined to suit number or gender. If this doer is not defined in the Bengali condition clause but needs to be stated in a natural-sounding English translation, this is identified and drawn from the second clause. For example:- Student: Teaching Truth in Bengali If you pay attention,* you will learn. manoyog kar-*le* tumi shikh-be. * [or, If attention is paid] (http://www.jaspell.co.uk/bengalicourse2007/wb149study49.pdf)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Participle
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DirectCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#DirectCase
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In the Romanian case system the value 'direct' conflates 'nominative' and 'accusative', e.g., -acea/acel, -aceasta/acesta, -această/acest (http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#DirectCase)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#StatusConstructus
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2997
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	According to the Arabic usage of this category, modeled here as a DefinitenessFeature, though not directly a subconcept of definite, because it has other functions in other languages.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	morphological form of the nominal head of noun+noun-phrases which in spite of a missing determiner (article) is invariably understood as semantically determined. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2997) The construct state or status constructus is a noun form occurring in Afro-Asiatic languages. It is particularly common in Semitic languages (such as Arabic, Hebrew, and Syriac), in the Berber languages, and in the extinct Egyptian language. ... In Semitic languages, nouns are placed in the construct state when they are semantically definite and modified by another noun in a genitive construction. Note that this differs from the genitive case of European languages in that it is the head (modified) noun rather than the dependent (modifying) noun which is marked. However, in Semitic languages with grammatical case (e.g. Classical Arabic), the modifying noun in a genitive construction is placed in the genitive case, in addition to marking the head noun with the construct state. ... The construct state is one of the three grammatical states of nouns in Arabic, the other two being the indefinite state and the definite state. ... (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Construct_state)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#DefinitenessFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Diminuitive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#Diminuitive, in MTE v.4 originally modelled as an aspect of Degree, but this is a misplacement. There are languages where Degree and Diminuitivity are independent. In Latvian, for example, the diminutive suffix may be attached to an adjective, not only in the positive but in the comparative and superlative degrees (Ruke-Dravina 1953). Velta Ruke-Dravina (1953), Adjectival Diminuitives in Latvian. The Slavonic and East European Review 31(77): 452-465
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A diminutive is a formation of a word used to convey a slight degree of the root meaning, smallness of the object or quality named, encapsulation, intimacy, or endearment. It is the opposite of an augmentative. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diminutive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Derivation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Coordination
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	As has already been shown in some of the preceding examples, the issue of coordination necessarily arises: how is coordination to be represented in terms of constituency? Different approaches have been taken, and in the example analyses given in this document, we have chosen to take a traditional approach, showing the coordinated constituents at the same level, with the conjunction between them (see also 47 and 48): (51) [NP [NP John NP] and [NP Mary NP] NP] (52) She went [PP [PP to the library PP] or [PP to the cafeteria PP] PP] (53) He works [ADVP [ADVP very slowly ADVP] but [ADVP very meticulously ADVP] ADVP] However, in practice, in an automated parsing system, this is not an easy differentiation to make, and in some existing schemes, a slightly less satisfactory solution has been found, viz. analysing coordination in a similar fashion to subordination. Most constituents (both phrases and clauses) can be coordinated, but the extent to which this is possible will differ across languages. The conjuncts may be marked as such by separate descriptors: NPtex2html_wrap_inline4084 etc. However, there are many occasions where the conjuncts are not of the same formal category, or where they do not correspond to an entire phrasal or clausal constituent. There is much to be said, in these cases, or perhaps for all cases of coordination, for the use of a generalised label applied to all coordinate constituents or conjuncts, e.g. the label CO used in the TOSCA system. We do not offer a definitive solution for the annotation of coordination, and the many variants of coordination will not be considered further in this report. See Sampson (1995: 310f) for a detailed treatment. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/segsasg1/node37.html)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Phrase
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AllativeCase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Allative; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1236
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	AllativeCase expresses motion to or toward the referent of the noun it marks (Pei and Gaynor 1954: 6,9,216; Lyons 1968: 299; Crystal 1985: 1213; Gove, et al. 1966: 55,2359). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Allative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SemanticInverseVoice
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/SemanticInverse
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	If the agent outranks the patient on the relevant generic topic hierarchy, the direct-active clause is used. If the relevant norm is reversed and the patient outranks the agent on the relevant hierarchy, the inverse clause is used. (Givon 1994:23) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/SemanticInverse)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InverseVoice
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Postposition
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES adposition with the optional attribute Type="Preposition".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A postposition is an adposition that occurs after its complement. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAPostposition.htm 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adposition
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#OpenCurlyBracket
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	open curly bracket
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2084
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Punctuation that is graphically represented as { (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2084)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LeftParentheticalPunctuation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ContrastiveParticle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from EMILLE, http://purl.org/olia/emille.owl#ContrastiveEmphaticParticle, note: there may be contrastive particles that are not emphatic
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Contrastive particle, e.g., (one of the uses of) Urdu tô: vo urdû parhê gâ "He will study Urdu." (simple statement) vo tô urdû parhê gâ "HE will study Urdu." (Contrast: the other students may not.) (Schmidt 1999, p. 232, see http://purl.org/olia/emille.owl#ContrastiveEmphaticParticle)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Particle
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Reduplication
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	reduplication
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2346 (reduplication)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	process to modify the sense of a word by some operations to repeat the sound of a word. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2346)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MorphologicalProcess
_:34
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LexicalUnit
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:35
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PresumptiveModality
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from ILPOSTS (http://purl.org/olia/ilposts.owl#PresumptiveMood) for Indian languages
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The presumptive mood is used in Romanian to express presupposition or hypothesis regarding the fact denoted by the verb, as well as other more or less similar attitudes: doubt, curiosity, concern, condition, indifference, inevitability. For example, acolo s-o fi dus "he might have gone there" shows the basic presupposition use, while the following excerpt from a poem by Eminescu shows the use both in a conditional clause de-o fi "suppose it is" and in a main clause showing an attitude of submission to fate le-om duce "we would bear". De-o fi una, de-o fi alta... Ce e scris și pentru noi, Bucuroși le-om duce toate, de e pace, de-i război. Be it one, be it the other... Whatever fate we have, We will gladly go through all, be it peace or be it war (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irrealis_mood#Presumptive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IrrealisModality
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Uncountable
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES, remodelling of MassNoun vs. CommonNoun
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A mass noun (also uncountable noun or non-count noun) can't be modified by a numeral, occur in singular/plural or co-occur with the relevant kind of determiner. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_noun 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CountabilityFeature
_:36
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasStrength
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CoordinateClause
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#coordinateClause
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A coordinate clause is a clause belonging to a series of two or more clauses which are not syntactically dependent on one another, and are joined by means of a coordinate conjunction, a connective or parataxis. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/glossaryoflinguisticterms/WhatIsACoordinateClause.htm).
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FiniteClause
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasReflexivity
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ReflexivityFeature
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#domain	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Verb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Question
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Santorini 1991, Bies et al. 1995
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	There are two types of questions: direct questions (which are main clauses ending with a question mark) and indirect questions (which are subordinate clauses embedded under a verb). In this section, we discuss only direct questions; indirect questions are bracketed as SBARâ ¹s (see Section 5.17). (Santorini 1991)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SentenceTypeFeature
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InterrogativeModality
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InterrogativeModality
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#interrogativeModality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The interrogative modality serves to indicate interrogative quality. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#interrogativeModality)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ModalityFeature
_:0
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:37
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IndefiniteDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Determiner with DetType="Indefinite"
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An indefinite determiner is a determiner that expresses a referent's indefinite number or amount, i.e. "some", "any", "many". (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAQuantifier.htm 22.09.06) Note that here, a separate top-level class Quantifier has been introduced that covers expressions of number and amount as *semantic* concepts. Plural indefinite determiners are thus to be modeled as IndefiniteDeteriner and Quantifier.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Determiner
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MorphosyntacticCategory
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
_:22
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:38
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ConditionalIrrealisModality
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	ILPOSTS (Indian languages), http://purl.org/olia/ilposts.owl#NonReal is restricted to conditional participles, hence probably a subtype of ConditionalMood
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Conditional Mood (modality) with Irrealis meaning (ILPOSTS)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ConditionalModality
_:39
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasNumber
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Control
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	From http://www.lexinfo.net/ontology/2.0/lexinfo#Control. But note that we regard Control as a feature of syntactic units (either verbs [=> control/raising] or arguments [=> raisable argument], not as a subclass of Frame, this reflects a different understanding of "Frame", in OLiA, Frames are semantic units, in lexinfo, they seem to be syntactic patterns, in other resources, e.g., VerbNet, both aspects are combined.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Control indicates how a an argument from a main clause will be utilized in a subclause. This class includes both control structures and raising structures (http://www.lexinfo.net/ontology/2.0/lexinfo#Control)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MovementFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#WHPronoun
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Pronoun with Pron.-Type="Int./Rel.".
	TODO: Check cross-linguistic validity of this class. This class is based on surface criteria of Indo-European languages. In other (and even IE) languages, relative pronouns are partly also derived from non-interrogatives, but rather from demonstratives, cf. English "that". Should be abandoned unless language-independent evidence for its existence is provided. DEPRECATED: to be replaced with InterrogativePronoun or RelativePronoun
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:40
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Pronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#VoiceFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	hierarchically restructured
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:41
	_:42
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Converb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Introduced to account for Converbs in Armenian and other languages, a generalization over деепричастие
	TODO: clarify terminological relation between Converb, Supine and AdverbialParticiple
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A converb is "[...] a nonfinite verb form whose main function is to mark adverbial subordination. Another way of putting it is that converbs are verbal adverbs, just like participles are verbal adjectives." Haspelmath, M., & König, E. (1995). Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, p. 3
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NonFiniteVerb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#HabitualAspect
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Habitual (as Aspect), http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#habitualTense (as Tense), modelled as an aspect here (temporally unmarked Habitual should be modelled as NotTemporallyAnchored)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Habitual tense pertains to verbs which refer to an action that occurs repeatedly. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#habitualTense) Refers to the internal temporal contour of a situation — a repeated situation that occupies a large slice of time. Can be based on the observation of a single occurrence. (Bhat 1999:177) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Habitual)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#AspectFeature
_:43
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasEmphasis
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
http://purl.org/olia/system.owl
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology
_:44
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasDefiniteness
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSyntacticRole
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SyntacticRole
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#domain	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#UnitOfAnnotation
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Head
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TIGER edge label HD, definition according to Penn Treebank Bracketing Guidelines (Santorini 1991)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	TIGER edge label HD
	Heads are single words that function as the nucleus of a phrase. For instance, the head of the noun phrase John’s book is book. Book is also the head of the more complex noun phrase that interesting book that you were telling me about the other day. The head of the verb phrase telling me about the other day is telling. The head of a prepositional phrase is the preposition. (Santorini 1991)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SyntacticRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Conjunction
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	conjonction
	conjunction
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES top-level concept Conjunction (C).
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A conjunction is a word that syntactically links words or larger constituents, and expresses a semantic relationship between them. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAConjunction.htm 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MorphosyntacticCategory
_:3
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:45
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
_:46
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CommonNoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:47
_:48
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:49
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasClusivity
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ClusivityFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
_:50
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	_:51
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Inflected
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Chiarcos
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	see subclasses
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#InflectionTypeFeature
https://mtp.linked.solutions/olia
http://purl.org/dc/terms/source	https://github.com/linked-solutions/prefix.cc-harvest/master
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Read timed out
http://purl.org/vocab/vann/preferredNamespaceUri	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#
http://purl.org/vocab/vann/preferredNamespacePrefix	olia
_:29
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:52
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
_:53
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MiddleVoice
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:54
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adverb
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	adverbe
	adverb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES top-level category Adverb (AV). Skipped subconcepts ParticleAdverb and GeneralAdverb: ParticleAdverb is better described by the join of particles or adverbs rather than positing an independent category; GeneralAdverb is merely the complement of DegreeAdverb.
	TODO: currently, different criteria are employed to characterize Adverbs, including lexical criteria (e.g., AdjectivalAdverb) and semantic criteria (e.g., CausalAdverb). The subclassification according to semantic criteria is to be expressed with hasSemanticRole, the classes are thus deprecated.
	DCR general adverb (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1435) ignored
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An adverb is a part of speech that serves to modify non-nominal parts of speech, i.e., verbs, adjectives (including numbers), clauses, sentences and other adverbs. Modifiers of nouns are primarily determiners and adjectives. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adverbs 18.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MorphosyntacticCategory
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Abbreviation
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	abbreviation
	abreviation
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Category Abbreviations with Type="Abbreviation".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Abbreviation (from Latin brevis "short") is strictly speaking a shorter form of a word, but more particularly, an abbreviation is a letter or group of letters, taken from a word or words, and employed to represent them for the sake of brevity. For example, the word "abbreviation" can be abbreviated as "abbr." or "abbrev." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abbreviation 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Residual
_:55
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#WHTypeAdverbs
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:56
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#DefinitenessFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TODO: use this property to define Definite/IndefiniteArticle
	Skipped EAGLES "Unmarked" definiteness that was only introduced "to handle the suffixed definite article in Danish: e.g. "haven" (`the garden'); "havet" (`the sea')." (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node19.html#oav2 16.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:44
_:13
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:57
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
_:58
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Article
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:59
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ReduplicationTypeFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:60
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasTense
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#TenseFeature
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#domain	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Verb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#WHDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TODO: This class is based on surface criteria of Indo-European languages. In other (and even IE) languages, relative pronouns are partly also derived from non-interrogatives, but rather from demonstratives, cf. English "that". Should be abandoned unless language-independent evidence for its existence is provided. DEPRECATED: to be replaced by InterrogativeDeterminer or RelativeDeterminer
	EAGLES Determiner with Det.-Type="Int./Rel.".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:61
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Determiner
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ExistentialParticle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#ExistentialThere
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	English existential there is specified as a subtype of pronoun in MTE v4, i.e., Pronoun/Type="ex-there" (http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#ExistentialThere)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Particle
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MorphologicalCategory
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
_:30
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:62
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
_:63
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InterrogativePronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
_:7
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#someValuesFrom	_:64
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasChild
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#NarrativeType
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
_:65
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adverb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:66
_:27
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:67
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
_:68
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Verb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:69
_:70
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:71
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SyntacticRelation
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TODO: check TDS and GOLD
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:72
	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#Relation
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#GenderFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:73
_:74
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	_:75
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
_:76
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Clause
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
_:33
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:77
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
_:78
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:79
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasInflectionType
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#InflectionTypeFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
_:80
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:81
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Present
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES, http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#presentTense
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Present tense refers to the moment of utterance. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#presentTense) Present tense refers to the moment of utterance. It often refers to events or states that do not merely coincide with the moment of utterance, such as those that are continuous, habitual, or lawlike. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/glossaryoflinguisticterms/WhatIsPresentTense.htm 17.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AbsoluteTense
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SentenceMedialPunctuation
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in accordance with a suggestion by Wilson and Leech (1996)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	SentenceMedialPunctuation are , ; : - . (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node17.html#recv 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SecondaryPunctuation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ExpletivePronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TODO: revise definition, the GOLD definition applies to copula, too.
	Missing in the EAGLES recommendations, added in accordance with the TIGER annotation scheme (for German). As expletive pronouns often (e.g., in German or English) have the form of 3.sg personal pronouns, expletives are modelled here as subclass of ThirdPersonPronoun.
	TODO: compare with GOLD, modeled as a PartOfSpeechProperty there
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An expletive (also known as a dummy word) is a part of speech whose members have no meaning, but complete a sentence to make it grammatical [Crystal 1997, 127] (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Expletive) In European languages, expletives are pronouns. A verbal part of speech that "has no meaning, but complete a sentence to make it grammatical" is a copula (see AuxiliaryVerb).
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ThirdPersonPronoun
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Expletive
_:82
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Noun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
_:83
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Determiner
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:84
_:85
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#someValuesFrom	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InterrogativeModality
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasModality
_:69
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adjective
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:86
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PersonalPronoun
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	personal pronoun
	irreflexive personal pronoun
	pronom personnel
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3013 (irreflexive personal pronoun)
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES PersReflPronoun with "Special PronounType"="Personal".
	TODO: the SIL definition (also used in GOLD) is nonsatisfactory. German reflexive pronouns have person distinction, so this definition actually applies to EAGLES PersReflPronoun rather than EAGLES PersonalPronoun.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A personal pronoun is a pronoun that expresses a distinction of person deixis. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAPersonalPronoun.htm 19.09.06) Note that (despite the SIL definition), an olia:PersonalPronoun refers to irreflexive personal pronouns. Personal pronoun categories without reflexivity sensitivity should be mapped onto olia:PersReflPronoun. (CC)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PersReflPronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DubitiveModality
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Dubitive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	DubitiveMood indicates a speaker's doubt or uncertainty about a proposition (Palmer 2001). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Dubitive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ModalityFeature
_:20
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:87
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Prefix
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	prefix
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1365
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Affix added before a word to change its meaning or part of speech. (Sue Ellen Wright + Gil Francopoulo; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1365)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Affix
_:77
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adverb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:88
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Preposition
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	préposition
	preposition
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES adposition with Type="Preposition".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A preposition is an adposition that occurs before its complement. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAPreposition.htm 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adposition
_:89
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:90
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
_:37
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CommonNoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:50
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AttributivePronoun
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:91
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	In languages with grammaticalized determiners, attributive pronouns are determiners. In languages without grammaticalized determiners, attributive pronouns are described as adjectives. In order to provide a uniform modeling of attributive pronouns, they are defined here as being the intersection of Determiner and Pronoun. Note that this entails that the definition of "Determiner" is broadened to include determiner-like elements in languages without grammatical determiners. (Chiarcos)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An attributive pronoun is a pronoun that modifies an NP.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Determiner
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Pronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#AnimacyFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubordinateClause
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Subclassification here follows the functional subclassification of subordinate clauses in the TDS ontologies. GOLD proposes an alternative syntax-based subclassification (yet without documentation or explanation) in AdjunctSubordinate and ComplementSubordinate. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/ComplementSubordinate, http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/AdjunctSubordinate)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	SubordinateClause is the class of clauses that cannot stand on their own as sentences. A matrix clause combined with a subordinate clause form a main clause. In the sentence 'John thinks that Mary is sick', 'Mary is sick' is the subordinate clause. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/SubordinateClause) Dependent clauses (which are also sometimes referred to as subordinate clauses) cannot stand alone as sentences. They usually begin with subordinating conjunctions. A sentence with an independent clause and any number of dependent clauses is referred to as a complex sentence. One with two or more independent clauses and any number of dependent clauses is referred to as a compound-complex sentence (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clause, cf. http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#subordinateClause). A subordinate clause is an embedded construction which contains a finite verb form. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#finiteEmbeddedConstruction)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FiniteClause
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#QuestionWord
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	question word
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:89
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-4205
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	deprecated, as merely a shorthand for Lexeme and hasModality some InterrogativeModality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A proform that is used in questions to stand for the item questioned.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Lexeme
_:92
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasMood
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
_:93
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasModality
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TemporallyDefinedUsage
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	dating
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1959
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Indication specifying whether the usage is old or modern.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Possible
_:94
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Noun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:95
_:96
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	_:97
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
_:98
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSemanticRole
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
_:99
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ProperNoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:100
_:101
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#someValuesFrom	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CoordinatingConjunction
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasParent
_:15
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:102
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NonFiniteVerb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1332
	EAGLES Verb with Finiteness="Non-finite".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Verb forms occurring on their own only in dependent clauses and lacking tense and mood contrasts. (adapted from Crystal 2003; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1332) A non-finite verb is a verb that is not fully inflected for categories that are marked inflectionally in a language, such as the following: Tense, Aspect, Modality, Number, Person. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsANonfiniteVerb.htm 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Verb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Exclusive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3029
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	a form denoting that the addressee (addressees) are not included into the set of their referents which contain also the speaker
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ClusivityFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Particle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	synonym of Unique, to be avoided because of its divergent definitions, applies to every category that *contains* the expression "Particle" in its name
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	synonym of Unique, to be avoided because of its divergent definitions (Chiarcos)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Unique
_:103
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasAspect
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
_:100
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	_:104
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
_:105
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasDegree
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasReduplicationType
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ReduplicationTypeFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	cf. http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2240
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#EmphaticParticle
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:106
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from EMILLE, http://purl.org/olia/emille.owl#ContrastiveEmphaticParticle, http://purl.org/olia/emille.owl#ExclusiveEmphaticParticle, etc. From a logical point of view, emphasis is closely related to intensification, hence, subconcept of Intensifier
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Emphatic particle, e.g., (one of the uses of) Urdu tô: vo urdû parhê gâ "He will study Urdu." (simple statement) vo urdû parhê gâ tô lêkin imtihân nahîm dê gâ "He will STUDY Urdu, OF COURSE, but he won't take the examination." (Schmidt 1999, p. 232, see http://purl.org/olia/emille.owl#ContrastiveEmphaticParticle)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Particle
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Intensifier
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#PersonFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:107
_:108
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#QuestionWord
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
_:75
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#someValuesFrom	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Past
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasTense
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CliticElement
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	cliticness
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1903 (cliticness), http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#Cliticness
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Note that Clitic covers only one aspect of the original MULTEXT-East (and ISOcat) definitions of cliticness, i.e., that an element is a clitic
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Morpheme
_:109
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#unionOf	_:110
_:111
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Sentence
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:76
_:112
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasProximity
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
_:25
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:46
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
_:113
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Noun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:114
http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#UnitOfAnnotation
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ActionalModality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	actional force
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3063
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	ActionalForce indicates that the speaker or hearer is to undertake some action. Actional force subsumes Imperative, Commissive and Hortatory force.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MoodFeature
_:115
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSyntacticFunction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Sentence
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TODO: model Sentence as separate concept indepdendently from Constituent (cf. TüBa-DZ "Root"). But what would be an appropriate name for that ?
	EAGLES category Sentence (S), http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/OrthographicSentence
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The maximal, syntactically independent, segments into which a text is subdivided, for parsing purposes, are normally considered to be sentences. In a written text, they are typically (though by no means invariably) delimited by an initial capital letter and a final full stop (`.') or other terminal punctuation. It is convenient to accept this primary orthographic definition of `sentence' for the purposes of syntactic annotation. However, a sentence, so defined, may be either a full sentence (9) or a `grammatically incomplete' one (10). (9) [S This is a sentence. S] (10) [S Well done. S] The same applies to sentences included within other sentences, as in (11) (11) [S [S ``Well done'', S] she said. S] } ``Well done'' in 11 is labelled as a sentence, since it clearly has an independent syntactic status equivalent to those of 9, even though it is included in another sentence. This inclusion of one independent sentence within another is found both with reported speech and elsewhere. Phenomena such as those illustrated in 10 are by no means exceptional in text corpora. In transcriptions of spoken discourse, there is no simple answer to the question ``What is a sentence?''. Some transcriptions, based on standard orthography, yield de facto sentences in the form of units beginning with a capital letter and closing with a terminal punctuation mark. For these, there is no problem in recognising the primary sentential segments and delimiting them by [S ... S], even though these segments frequently lack the canonical structure of a complete written sentence. Moreover, even in other transcriptions, where the standard orthographic practices of sentence delimitation are avoided, it is possible to identify `primary segments' analogous to the written sentence, viz. the primary units into which the transcribed discourse is divided for parsing purposes. For spoken as well as written language, then, the [S] unit may be retained, although it may be interpreted differently, and some other term, such as `primary segment', may be preferred to `sentence'. We conclude by recommending, for the syntactic annotation of any text (including a transcription of spoken language), an exhaustive division of the text into units labelled [S ... S]. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/segsasg1/node30.html#SECTION00052100000000000000)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#Constituent
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#PolarityFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:116
	_:117
_:118
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Noun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
_:119
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasInflectionType
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
_:24
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#someValuesFrom	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Atransitive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSemanticValency
_:120
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasReflexivity
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
_:31
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:99
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
_:121
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Noun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:122
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SyntacticConstruction
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ElativeDegree
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#ElativeDegree, http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1276, note that the latter conflates ElativeDegree and ElativeCase
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	e.g., прешпионска/шпионски, прешпионскава/шпионски, прешпионскана/шпионски, прешпионската/шпионски, прешпионски/шпионски, прешпионскиве/шпионски, прешпионскине/шпионски, прешпионскиов/шпионски, прешпионскион/шпионски (mk)
	e.g., predivan, prekasan, premanjeg/premali, premanjega/premali, premanjem/premali, premanjemu/premali, premanji/premali (sr)
	MULTEXT-East Degree="elative" (Adjective: Resian, Serbian, Macedonian) In Semitic languages, ElativeDegree refers to the “adjective of superiority.” In some languages such as Arabic, the concepts of comparative and superlative degree of an adjective are merged into a single form, the elative. How this form is understood or translated depends upon context and definiteness. In the absence of comparison, the elative conveys the notion of “greatest”, “supreme.” The elative of كبير (kabí:r, "big") is أكبر (’ákbar, “bigger/biggest”, “greater/greatest”). (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/elative) In Slavic languages, as well, it is pretty standard. I do agree with the definition though, that "the elative conveys the notion of “greatest”, “supreme.”" So, Slovene "lep" is beautiful, "prelep" is very (or supremely) beautiful; I guess the "pre-" prefix could be roughly translated as "over-". Used in Resian, Serbian, Macedonian. In Slovenian, we banished it, as even "ordinary" degrees are borderline inflection / derivation, but, I think, elative is is definitely not inflection. (Tomaž Erjavec, email 2010/06/21)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#DegreeFeature
http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasTarget
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
_:123
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Verb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:124
_:125
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Verb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:126
_:104
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#someValuesFrom	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LocationRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSemanticRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSemanticValency
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ValencyFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Ch. Chiarcos
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Semantic valency pertains to the number of semantic arguments a predicate takes. This is not necessarily the same as syntactic valency: In English, expletive "it" is used as a syntactic argument if no semantic argument is available, cf. van Valin and Lapolla (1997).
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
_:127
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Particle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:128
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#StrictAuxiliaryVerb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Definition in accordance with the SFB632 definition of "auxiliary verb" as non-copular and non-modal verb. In EAGLES, auxiliary verb also seems to be non-modal: In addition to main and auxiliary verbs, it may be useful (e.g. in English) to recognise an intermediate category of semi-auxiliary for such verbs as be going to, have got to, ought to. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node18.html#oav1v 20.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Non-modal, non-copular auxiliary verb.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AuxiliaryVerb
_:129
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#someValuesFrom	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Transitive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSyntacticValency
_:130
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#someValuesFrom	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Emphatic
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasEmphasis
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InanimateGender
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Inanimate
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	One of the two grammatical genders, or noun classes, of Nishnaabemwin, the other being animate. Membership in the inanimate grammatical class is largely based on meaning, in that non-living things, such as objects of manufacture and natural 'non-living' things are included in it (Valentine 2001: 114). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Inanimate)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#GenderFeature
_:131
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSeparability
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
_:132
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#unionOf	_:133
_:134
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#someValuesFrom	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Transitive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSyntacticValency
_:135
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Residual
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
_:136
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasMood
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SemanticRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	One may consider modelling SemanticRoles and discourse relations within the same dimension. In particular, the semantics of adverbial modifiers (causal, temporal, 3al, etc.) closely resembles discourse relations.
	TODO: Check subcategorization in MacroRoles. Currently, this follows the TDS ontology, but the strict assignment of semantic roles to macroroles contradicts the selection algorithm as described by van Valin and Lapolla (1997): MacroRoles are not assigned a priori, but on on the basis of *relative agentivity* among the arguments.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:137
	_:98
_:62
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Raising
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:138
_:47
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	_:139
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MainVerb
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	main verb
	plain verb
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3004 (plainVerb)
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf verb (dcif:isA)
	to be renamed to LexicalVerb ("main verb" can also mean "head of a finite clause")
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1400 (main verb)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Main verb in contrast to a modal or an auxiliary. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1400) verb which has its own semantics (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3004, plainVerb)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Verb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TimitiveModality
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Timitive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	TimitiveMood expresses that the speaker fears something expressed in what is said (Palmer 2001: 13, 22). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Timitive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ModalityFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Atransitive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Chiarcos
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A predicate/verb that takes no argument. English "to rain" is semantically atransitive, hence, an expletive is to be used in "it's raining", cf. van Valin and Lapolla (1997).
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ValencyFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Clause
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES, http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Clause
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Traditionally sentences are deemed to be composed of major constituents known as clauses, which may be main clauses (not included in a superordinate clause) or embedded clauses (included in a superordinate clause) such as relative clauses or adverbial clauses. A main clause, unless it is coordinated, is equivalent to a simple sentence, and does not need to be separately labelled. Embedded and coordinated clauses, on the other hand, will need to be separately identified. We recommend that such units be identified in the annotation, and labelled either as sentences (S) or as clauses (CL), according to the preference specified in the annotation scheme. The reason for allowing choice here is that different theoretical preferences have to be accommodated. In some syntactic models, the `clause' category is not used (except informally), embedded clauses being marked by included [S] constituents. In other models, clauses are identified as such, even where they are coextensive with an independent sentence. One solution which commends itself (and is employed in the Lancaster Treebank and the SUSANNE Corpus) is to retain [S ... S] as the delimiter of sentences, whether included or not, and also to use [S ... S] for the coordinated parts of a compound sentence; but to use `clause' labels for subordinate clauses. An example which illustrates this division is 12: (12) [S [S The distinction at issue is relatively clear S] , but [S closer examination reveals [CL that all is not quite so straightforward [CL as it seems CL] CL] S] . S] Embedded (subordinate) clauses are generally identified by some sign of their dependence on the superordinate clause or sentence, such as an introductory conjunction or a non-finite verb form. It is noticeable that the coordinated parts of the compound sentence do not have to be clause-like units with subjects and verbs, and to this extent [CL] would be a misleading label to apply to them. This is true, in 13, of so far so good in: (13) [S [S So far so good S] , but [S now consider gender in adjectives S] . S] (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/segsasg1/node31.html)
	Clause is the class of constructions that form minimal sentential units. They must include a predicate, all arguments of the predicate, and all modifiers of the predicate and the arguments. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Clause)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#Constituent
_:140
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ProQuantifier
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:141
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Fronting
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	T-CODEX (Petrova 2008, http://purl.org/olia/tcodex.owl#InitionalPosition)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Expression occurs at the left periphery of the sentence. This includes various noncanonical and canonical word order possibilities. (Note that it is not restricted here to noncanonical word order; for noncanonical fronting see subconcepts, e.g., Topicalization.) (Chiarcos)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SyntacticConstruction
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PluralQuantifier
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:142
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#PluralQuantifier Numeral/Class="definite", Numeral/Class="definite1", Numeral/Class="definite234" etc. refer to specific patterns of congruency with Slavic numerals that originate from the difference between Old Slavic singular (definite1), dual (definite2, definite234) and plural (definite).
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A PluralQuantifier is a Quantifier (or Numeral) that specifies a large multitude of entities. The agreement pattern of a plural quantifier is different from that or an singular quantifier, but as opposed to DualQuantifier and PaucalQuantifier, PluralQuantifier includes quantifiers that denote arbitrarily large sets of entities. (Chiarcos) The corresponding category in Czech, Polish and Slovak MTE v4 specs is Numeral/Class="definite", that refers to numerals larger than four. (MTE v4)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#NumeralAgreementClass
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SpecificArticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	specific article
	specific determiner
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	introduced to account for the specific determiner in Farsi (http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#CliticSpecificDeterminer)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	"By ʻspecificʼ and ʻnon-specificʼ I intend the difference between the two readings of English indefinites like (3): (3) Iʼm looking for a deer. In the specific reading there is a particular deer, say Bambi, that I am looking for. In the non-specific reading I will be happy to find any deer. Von Heusinger (2002) likes the test in English of inserting ʻcertainʼ after the ʻaʼ to fix the specific reading. In either reading of (3) a deer is being introduced as a new discourse referent. This is opposed to ʻdefiniteʼ which requires a previous pragmatic instantiation as in ʻIʼm looking for the deer.ʼ In English both the readings of (3) are indefinite. In Klallam, the specific demonstratives are neither definite nor indefinite." (Montler, Timothy. 2007. Klallam demonstratives. Papers ICSNL XLVII. The 42nd International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Language, pp. 409-425. University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics, Volume 20; on specific vs. nonspecific determiners in Klallam, a Salish language, http://montler.net/papers/KlallamDemons.pdf)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Article
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#DegreeFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:105
_:143
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	_:144
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:145
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AuxiliaryVerb
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	auxiliaire
	auxiliary verb
http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#altLabel	auxiliary
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Verbs with Status="Auxiliary", http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1244
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An auxiliary verb is a verb which accompanies the lexical verb of a verb phrase, and expresses grammatical distinctions not carried by the lexical verb, such as person, number, tense aspect, and voice. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAnAuxiliaryVerb.htm 19.09.06) Besides modal verbs ("semiauxiliary") and "strict" auxiliary verbs, also copulas are classified under auxiliary verbs here, as this is a praxis applied in practically every EAGLES-conformant morphosyntactic annotation scheme. Part of speech referring to the set of verbs, subordinate to the main lexical verb which help to make distinction in mood, aspect, voice etc. (Crystal 2003; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1244)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Verb
_:146
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#someValuesFrom	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DeclarativeModality
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasModality
_:147
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	_:130
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
_:148
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	_:149
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ProQuantifier
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#ProQuantifier
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A ProQuantifier is a quantifier derived from a pronominal element. ProQuantifiers thus partly characterized as pronouns (e.g., as pronominal adverbs) or quantifiers (e.g., "indefinite numeral" as in MTE v.4). (http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#ProQuantifier)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Pronoun
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Quantifier
_:126
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PronounOrDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ThirdPersonPronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Pronoun with Person="Third". As only personal and reflexive pronouns show person differentiation, ThirdPersonPronoun is modelled as a subclass of PersReflConcept here.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Third person reference is a deictic reference to a referent(s) not identified as the speaker or addressee. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsThirdPersonDeixis.htm 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PersReflPronoun
_:150
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasNumeralAgreementClass
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Second
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES, http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Second
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Refers to the person(s) the speaker is addressing (Crystal 1997: 285). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Second)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#PersonFeature
_:151
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	_:152
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:82
_:153
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RelativePronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Countable
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES, remodelling of MassNoun vs. CommonNoun
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A countable noun (also count noun) is a noun which can be modified by a numeral and occur in both singular and plural form, as well as co-occurring with quantificational determiners like every, each, several, most, etc.. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Countable_noun 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CountabilityFeature
_:154
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasClusivity
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
_:155
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasAspect
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LayoutElement
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Introduced to account for Bullet http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1438
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Residual
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Noun
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	noun
	nom
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES top-level category "Noun".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A noun, or noun substantive, is a part of speech (a word or phrase) which can co-occur with (in)definite articles and attributive adjectives, and function as the head of a noun phrase. The word "noun" derives from the Latin 'nomen' meaning "name", and a traditional definition of nouns is that they are all and only those expressions that refer to a person, place, thing, event, substance, quality, idea or an appointment. They serve as the subject or object of a verb, and the object of a preposition. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noun 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MorphosyntacticCategory
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#GraphicalSeparator
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1863
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Character string that appears between two written forms
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Character
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Character
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#OrthographicEntity
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasValency
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ValencyFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SyntacticArgument
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added to account for TIGER edge labels with syntactic function
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An inherent (morpho)syntactic constituent subcategorized for by a predicate. 'Arguments are those terms which are required by some predicate in order to form a complete nuclear predication. They are essential to the integrity of the SoA designated by the predicate frame. If we leave them out, the property/relation designated by the predicate is not fulfilled or satisfied.' (Dik, 1997:86f) An argument can be a controller in an agreement relation. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#syntacticArgument) The category ARG is assigned to those syntactic constituents that appear as obligatory complements to the main verb. This means that they cannot be left out without a change in grammaticality or a significant change in meaning. (Dipper et al. 2007, §4.3.3)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SyntacticRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#EvidentialityFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:156
_:157
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Numeral
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:135
_:158
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#someValuesFrom	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MannerRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSemanticRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSyntacticFunction
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SyntacticFunction
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Bies et al. 1995
	TODO: apply this to primitive concepts, too
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Relation to be used when the syntactic function of a constituent is different from its morphosyntactic type, cf. FormFunctionDiscrepancy in the PTB bracketing guidelines, Bies et al. (1995, §2.2.1)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#OptativeModality
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Optative, http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#optativeModality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Optative indicates that the speaker wishes or hopes that the expressed proposition be the case (Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca 1994: 179; Palmer 2001: 204). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Optative)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ModalityFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasPolarity
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#PolarityFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MovementFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	2016/08/29 introduced to account for raising and control features in lexinfo
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:159
_:23
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:160
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Transitive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	SUSANNE (Sampson 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A predicate/verb that takes two arguments, e.g., English "to kiss", cf. van Valin and Lapolla (1997).
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ValencyFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Plural
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Plural is a grammatical number, typically referring to more than one of the referent in the real world. In English, nouns, pronouns, and demonstratives inflect for plurality. In many other languages, for example German and the various Romance languages, articles and adjectives also inflect for plurality. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plural 17.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#NumberFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ProximityFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:161
	_:112
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CommonNoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Noun with Type="Common".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A common noun is a noun that signifies a non-specific member of a group. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsACommonNoun.htm 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Noun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Infix
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	infix
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1313
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Affix inserted in the middle of a word to change its meaning or part of speech value. (Sue Ellen Wright; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1313)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Affix
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Quote
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	quote
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2081
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Punctuation usually used to surround a quotation. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2081)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SecondaryPunctuation
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#EvaluativeFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:162
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DirectObject
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/directObject, http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1274
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A direct object is a grammatical relation that exhibits a combination of certain independent syntactic properties, such as the following: the usual grammatical characteristics of the patient of typically transitive verbs; particular case marking; a particular clause position; the conditioning of an agreement affix on the verb; the capability of becoming the clause subject in passivization; the capability of reflexivization. The identification of the direct object relation may be further confirmed by finding significant overlap with similar direct object relations previously established in other languages. This may be done by analyzing correspondence between translation equivalents (Crystal 1985: 94; Hartmann and Stork 1972: 155; Mish et al. 1990: 358; Comrie 1989: 66; Andrews, Avery 1985: 68,120,126; Comrie 1985a: 337). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/directObject)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SyntacticObject
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasStrength
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#StrengthFeature
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#domain	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PronounOrDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
_:163
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RelativeDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DeclarativeModality
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	generalization over DeclarativeMood
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Pertaining to the mood or mode of a verb form or clause such that it predicates a type of (formal) assertion (OED). (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#declarativeModality)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ModalityFeature
_:164
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Sentence
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:165
_:166
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adjective
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:167
_:159
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasMovementFeature
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Collocation
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	collocation
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#Collocation
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A collocation is any habitually linked group of words - a kind of lexical partnership, e.g. 'fish and chips', 'salt and pepper', 'don't mention it', 'it's nothing...', 'Oh well!', 'bangers and mash'... and so on. Many idioms or idiomatic phrases exhibit collocation, e.g. in a jiffy. (http://www.englishbiz.co.uk/grammar/main_files/definitionsa-m.htm)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SemanticUnit
_:51
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#someValuesFrom	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MannerRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSemanticRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#AspectFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:103
	_:155
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ClusivityFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:168
	_:154
_:169
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasCoordType
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SyntacticFunction
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:115
	_:170
_:171
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#unionOf	_:94
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RelationalAdjective
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	relational adjective
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	cf. OrdinalAdjective
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The Slovene adjective expresses three main ideas: quality (qualitative adjectives, kakovostni pridevniki), relation (relational adjectives, vrstni pridevniki) and possession (possessive adjectives, svojilni pridevniki). Relational adjectives express type, class or numerical sequence of a noun. For instance: kemijska in fizikalna sprememba (chemical and physical change), fotografski aparat (photographic device (=camera)). (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slovene_grammar)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adjective
_:152
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#someValuesFrom	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Uncountable
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasCountability
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DirectionRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in conformance with PTB bracketing guidelines, Bies et al. (1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	-DIR (direction) â ´ marks adverbials that answer the questions â ¼from where?â ½ and â ¼to where?â ½ It implies motion, which can be metaphorical as in â ¼...rose 5 pts. to 57-1/2â ½ or â ¼increased 70% to 5.8 billion yenâ ½ (see section 23 [â ¼Financialspeakâ ½ Conventions]). -DIR is most often used with verbs of motion/transit and financial verbs: (S (NP-SBJ I) (VP flew (PP-DIR from (NP Tokyo)) (PP-DIR to (NP New York)))) (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SemanticRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Cliticization
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	cliticization
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.glottopedia.de/index.php/Cliticization; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1903 (cliticness), http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#Cliticness. Note that Cliticization covers only one aspect of the original MULTEXT-East (and ISOcat) definitions of cliticness, i.e., that an element is a clitic
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In morphosyntax, cliticization is a process by which a complex word is formed by attaching a clitic to a fully inflected word. Exsmple: In Je t'aime, t' is the clitic attached to aime. (http://www.glottopedia.de/index.php/Cliticization) Note that cliticization can also be understood as the process of an independent word developing into a clitic. This is not the meaning intended here, as the OLiA ontologies are currently not applied to the description of diachronic processes. (Chiarcos)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MorphologicalProcess
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#InflectionTypeFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In this category, different inflection-relevant features are assembled. Typically, inflection phenomena are language-specific and pertain to different grammatial categories; therefore, this collection is neither to be supposed exhaustive nor are the features necessarily disjoint (e.g., InflectedWithOvertMarker overlaps with StrongInflection or WeakInflection)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:172
	_:119
_:117
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasPolarity
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
_:173
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Article
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:157
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Diacritic
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#OrthographicEntity
_:35
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Phrase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Expletive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	expletive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	modelled as a Unique concept here, although normally not considered a Particle
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1283
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Word which serves no grammatical function, but which fills up a sentence or gives emphasis. (www.southwestern.edu/~carlg/Latin_Web/glossary.html; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1283)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Unique
_:124
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PronounOrDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:58
_:110
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Noun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:174
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Residual
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES top-level category Residual (R) with the exception of its subclass "Unclassified". Unclassified is not represented in the OLiA ontology, as it does not represent information, but the absence of information.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The residual value (R) is assigned to classes of text words which lie outside the traditionally accepted range of grammatical classes, although they occur quite commonly in many texts and very commonly in some. For example: foreign words, or mathematical formulae. It can be argued that these are on the fringes of the grammar or lexicon of the language in which the text is written. Nevertheless, they need to be tagged. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node16.html#mr 19.09.06) Although words in the Residual category are on the periphery of the lexicon, they may take some of the grammatical characteristics, e.g., of nouns. Acronyms such as IBM are similar to proper nouns; symbols such as alphabetic characters can vary for singular and plural (e.g. How many Ps are there in `psychopath'?), and are in this respect like common nouns. In some languages (e.g. Portuguese) such symbols also have gender. It is quite reasonable that in some tagging schemes some of these classes of word will be classified under other parts of speech. (The Unclassified category applies to word-like text segments which do not easily fit into any of the foregoing values. For example: incomplete words and pause fillers such as er and erm in transcriptions of speech, or written representations of singing such as dum-de-dum. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node17.html#recr 19.09.06)
	From a linguistic point of view, Residuals are a heterogeneous class and so, Residual may overlap with every linguistically motivate annotation concept. Also between subconcepts, overlap may occur (e.g. \LaTeX which is a symbol which can be read as an Acronym or acronyms which are related to Abbreviations, e.g. GNU "Gnu is not Unix")
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MorphosyntacticCategory
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SpecificityFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:175
	_:176
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SemanticUnit
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
_:177
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#someValuesFrom	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CauseRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSemanticRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PastParticiple
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:178
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	introduced as a shorthand for Participle and hasTense some Past
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Participle
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasConjunct
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#CoordinatingConjunction_ConjunctType
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:101
	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SyntacticRelation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Participle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	participe
	participle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1341
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES NonFinite with VerbForm="Participle".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A participle is a lexical item, derived from a verb that has some of the characteristics and functions of both verbs and adjectives. In English, participles may be used as adjectives, and in non-finite forms of verbs. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAParticiple.htm 19.09.06) Non-finite form of a verb other than the infinitive that is used in many languages possibly in conjunction with an auxiliary and that functions attributively, predicatively or adverbially. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1341)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NonFiniteVerb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Extraposition
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	PTB bracketing guidelines, Bies et al. 1995
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	*EXP* — Expletive (extraposition) ... In cases where a clausal subject has been extraposed and replaced by an expletive it, we use a type of pseudo-attach called *EXP*. (In the small ATIS sample included with this release, it is also used for existential there.) Use of *EXP*-attach is discussed in more detail in section 17 [It-Extraposition]. (S (NP-SBJ (NP It) (SBAR *EXP*-1)) (VP is (ADJP-PRD clear) (PP to (NP me)) (SBAR-1 that (S (NP-SBJ this message) (VP is (ADJP-PRD unclear)))))) (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SyntacticConstruction
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CoordTypeFeature
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	DEPRECATED: reimplemented as class hierarchy
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:169
_:179
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Particle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:180
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InterrogativePronoun
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:181
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES WHPronoun with Wh-Type="Interrogative".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A interrogative pronoun is a pro-form that is used in questions in place of the item questioned for. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAnInterrogativeProForm.htm 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#WHPronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasEvaluativeFeature
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#EvaluativeFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Antipassive
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Antipassive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Derives an intransitive verb from a transitive stem whereby the original agent (only) is cross-referrenced by the absolutive markers on the verb and the original patient, if it appears, is in an oblique phrase. (England 1983:110) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Antipassive)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#VoiceFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Predicate
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adapted from http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/predicate
	Note that most predicates are also (semantic) Heads of the respective clause (cf. van Valin and Lapolla 1997, who, however, use the term "nucleus"). A syntax-centered approach on heads may, however, assign the label Head to an auxiliary. As "head" is ambiguous between a syntactic function (finite verb) and a semantic function (predicate), a direct association is avoided here.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The predicate is the relation between the Clause and a portion of a clause, excluding the subject, that expresses something about the subject (Crystal 1980: 280; Hartmann and Stork 1972: 182; Pei and Gaynor 1954: 173; Pike and Pike 1982: 40; Mish et al. 1990: 926; Crystal 1985: 241-242). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/predicate)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SyntacticRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasGender
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#GenderFeature
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#domain	_:132
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
_:182
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Quantifier
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:183
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RelativePronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES WHPronoun with Wh-Type="Relative".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A relative pronoun is a pronoun that marks a relative clause, functions grammatically within the relative clause, and is coreferential to the word modified by the relative clause. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsARelativePronoun.htm 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#WHPronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Inclusive
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3030
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	the form denoting that the addressee (addressees) are included into the set of their referents which contain also the speaker
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ClusivityFeature
_:12
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:113
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
_:184
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasStrength
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
_:88
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Particle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
_:1
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#someValuesFrom	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Token
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasChild
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MainPunctuation
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	main punctuation
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf punctuation (dcif:isA)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2075
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Punctuation that is more important than a secondary punctuation with regards to sentence splitting in a text. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2075)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Punctuation
_:160
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adverb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:96
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasAspect
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#AspectFeature
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#domain	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Verb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
_:183
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	_:185
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ActiveVoice
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#activeVoice
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	When the subject is the agent or actor of the verb, the verb is in the active voice. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_voice 17.11.06) Associated with transitivity, when the action is performed by an agent (subject) on another participant (object), or with intransitivity (McIntosh 1984:108). Refers to the category of underived verb forms associated with the basic diathesis: Diathesis=D0:(X=SUBabs/nom) (Y=DIROBacc) (Shibatani 1995:7) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Active)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#VoiceFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LexicalUnit
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	introduced as a generalization over Lexeme and Phraseme (as opposed to phrase) with the extension to lexical-semantic resources like Uby
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A LexicalUnit is a grammatical expression that is known to the speakers of that language as a conventional expression of a particular concept. It consists of a single lexeme or a conventional combination of lexemes with certain unchangeable characteristics (CC).
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SemanticUnit
_:168
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasClusivity
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Derivation
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	derivation
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1271
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Change in the form of a linguistic unit, usually modification in the base/root or affixation to create a new word. (Sue Ellen Wright + Gil Francopoulo; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1271)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MorphologicalProcess
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ConditionalMood
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	conditional
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf verbFormMood (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1258
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In Inuktitut, conditionality is expressed by verbal inflection. Conditional mood signifies conditional relationships in a sentence. (Nowak 1996, p.39) A conditional relation is a logical relation in which the illocutionary act employing one of a pair of propositions is expressed or implied to be true or in force if the other proposition is true. (www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAConditionalRelation.htm; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1258) Elke Nowak (1996), Transforming the images: Ergativity and transitivity in Inuktitut (Eskimo). Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MoodFeature
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ConditionalModality
_:186
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Noun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:187
_:188
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Participle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:74
_:178
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:188
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasCountability
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CountabilityFeature
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#domain	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Noun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PrepositionalPhrase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A sequence of a preposition and its complement is a prepositional phrase. The complement of a preposition is usually a noun phrase (see examples 38 to 40), but may also be a clause or an adverb phrase. According to the categories recommended here, a prepositional phrase may be analysed further into preposition and noun phrase. The examples below demonstrate how this further analysis can be a recursive procedure. (38) [PP en [NP sustitucion [PP de [NP los canales correspondientes [PP de [NP 50 baudios NP] PP] NP] PP] NP] PP]. (39) [NP Fairbanks NP] [VP hummed [NP a few bars NP] VP] [PP in [NP a voice [VP made resonant [PP by [NP the very weakness [PP of [NP his chest NP] PP] NP] PP] VP] NP] PP]. (40) [PP En [NP el caso [PP de [NP un sistema mixto [PP en [NP el [CL que [VP se utilicen [NP canales [PP con [NP tres velocidades [PP de [NP modulacion NP] PP] diferentes NP] PP] NP] VP] CL] NP] PP] NP] PP] NP] PP] In a language such as Spanish, where a large proportion of the modification of nouns takes the form of a following preposition de and another noun, this recursion is extremely prevalent, as in 40. In cases where the prepositional phrase is complemented by a one word noun phrase, it may be advantageous to leave the analysis at this point, rather than continuing to analyse further by enclosing the complement (see also one-word constituents). (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/segsasg1/node34.html#SECTION00052500000000000000)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NounHeadedPhrase
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PaucalQuantifier
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:70
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#PaucalQuantifier
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Quantifiers that enforce paucal agreement. In many Slavic languages, numerals between 2 and 4 (and some quantifiers) involve a specific agreement patterns that is different from that of smaller and greater numbers. In Russian, for example, genitive singular is requires. These numerals and quantifiers with the same characteristics are referred to here as "paucal quantifiers". (cf. David Pesetsky, http://www.uni-leipzig.de/~jtrommer/Harvard/pesetsky.pdf)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#NumeralAgreementClass
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LeftParentheticalPunctuation
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in accordance with a suggestion by Wilson and Leech (1996); http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2078 (open punctuation)
	TODO: rename to OpeningPerentheticalPunctuation to support scripts running from left to right.
	TODO: rename to OpenPunctuation
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Beginning of a paired punctuation. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2078)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ParentheticalPunctuation
_:10
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:34
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IrrealisModality
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#irrealisModality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Irrealis modality indicates the situation to which it pertains is non-actual or non-factual. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#irrealisModality)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ModalityFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ProperNoun
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	proper name
	nom propre
	proper noun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Noun with Type="Proper".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Proper nouns (also called proper names) are the names of unique entities. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noun 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Noun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasPerson
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#PersonFeature
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#domain	_:189
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SyntacticAdjunct
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#syntacticAdjunct
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Prototypically, an optional (morpho)syntactic constituent. 'Satellites are not ... required by the predicate; they give optional further information pertaining to additional features of the SoA ..., the location of the SoA ..., the speaker's attitude towards or evaluation of the propositional content ..., or the character of the speech act...' (Dik, 1997:87) (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#syntacticAdjunct) The category adjunct (ADJ) is assigned to those constituents that appear as optional additions, be it to the main verb or to a given noun. This means that they can be left out freely without a change in grammaticality or a significant change in meaning. In "John called Mary (from school) (with his cell phone)" the optional additions "from school" and "with his cell phone" are such optional additions that can be left out freely. Adjuncts are generally used to convey additional information about the time, place, manner, or cause of the event or situation described by the clause (see below). That is, they restrict the class of events/ situations described by the clause to a subset. If required the category ADJ can be split up into semantic sub-categories, that are annotated in layer semantic roles (time, location, etc.). (Dipper et al. 2007, §4.3.3)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SyntacticRole
_:52
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ExistentialParticle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:190
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Animate
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	animate
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf animacy (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1911
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Perceived as alive. (ISO12620; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1911)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#AnimacyFeature
_:8
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:191
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MorphologicalParticle
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:78
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in accordance with TIGER MorphologicalParticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	added in accordance with TIGER MorphologicalParticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Token
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Morpheme
_:192
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RelativePronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:63
http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#Relation
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
_:142
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:193
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#VerbalHead
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#VerbalHead
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in conformance with the SFB632 Annotation Guidelines (Dipper et al. 2007)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A Verb (V) at the syntax layer is either a lexical (VLEX) or a copula verb (VCOP) at the POS layer. Modal verbs and auxiliaries are not annotated in the constituent structure. The verb and its arguments are placed at the same CSn layer. Raising and control verbs are treated like ordinary verbs. They subcategorize for a sentential complement. (Dipper et al 2007, §3.3.3)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Head
_:5
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:186
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasCoordType
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CoordTypeFeature
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#domain	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CoordinatingConjunction
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ImperativeModality
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#imperativeModality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Pertaining to the mood or mode of a verb form or clause such that it predicates a command, request, or exhortation (OED). (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#imperativeModality)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ActionalModality
_:194
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Participle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:195
_:196
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Token
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ParentheticalPunctuation
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in conformance with Penn Treebank Bracketing Guidelines (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Parenthetical elements are dominated by a node labeled PRN. Punctuation marks that set off a parenthetical (i.e., commas, dashes, parentheses (-LRB- and -RRB-)) are contained within the PRN node. Use of PRN is determined ultimately by individual annotator intuition, though the presence of dashes or parentheses strongly suggests a parenthetical. (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SecondaryPunctuation
_:197
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#someValuesFrom	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Emphatic
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasEmphasis
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AdverbPhrase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An adverb phrase may consist of an adverb, or a sequence of words in which an adverb is the head of the phrase. Adverb phrases may function as adverbials, as in 41: (41) [NP Her beautiful white hat NP] [VP was [ADVP very nearly ADVP] ruined VP] or as modifiers of adjectives, as in 42: (42) [NP Il NP] [VP parle [ADVP infiniment plus couramment ADVP] VP] or noun phrases, as in 43: (43) [NP They NP] [VP let [NP me NP] [VP speak VP] [ADVP now and then ADVP] VP] or as the complement of a preposition, as in 44: (44) [ADVP Strangely enough ADVP] , [NP we NP] [VP received [NP a reply NP] [NP the next day NP] VP] Other examples: (45) [NP The book NP] [VP is [ADVP right here ADVP] VP] (46) [ADVP Como [NP resultado [PP de [NP esa trama NP] PP] NP] ADVP] [VP no se lleva [PP a cabo PP] [NP ninguna acción NP] VP] (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/segsasg1/node35.html)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Phrase
_:198
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Pronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:147
_:145
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	_:199
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
_:200
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSyntacticRole
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RelativeModality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3836
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Clarify relationship with DirectSpeech
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Mood to express reported speech (or indirect speech) as opposed to direct speech.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ModalityFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FiniteClause
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Clause
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MiddleVoice
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#middleVoice
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A verb that appears active but expresses a passive action may be called middle voice, e.g. 'The chicken cooked in the oven'. In Greek the middle voice is often reflexive expressing a causative reading or that the action is performed for one's own benefit. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#middleVoice)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#VoiceFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasEmphasis
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#EmphasisFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Lexeme
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	lexeme
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1325
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Minimal unit of language which : has a semantic interpretation and embodies a distinct cultural concept. (www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsALexeme.htm; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1325)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LexicalUnit
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SyntacticRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	2010/04/08 merged with EAGLES NPFunction "NPFunction is an additional optional attribute for adjectives. It subsumes the values HeadFunction, Postmodifying and Premodifying." (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node18.html#oav1a 20.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:200
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSeparability
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SeparabilityFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
_:95
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adjective
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:123
_:201
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#someValuesFrom	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PaucalQuantifier
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasNumeralAgreementClass
_:61
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#unionOf	_:202
_:203
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#someValuesFrom	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Countable
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasCountability
_:202
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InterrogativeDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:163
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#OrthographicEntity
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Article
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLE top-level category "Article" (AT): In Eagles articles are subsumed under determiners and kept as a separate class. It is a sub-class of determiners which is disjoint with the other determiner classes. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node17.html#recn 18.09.06) Modelled here as sub-class of Determiner because of its syntactic function.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An article is a member of a small class of determiners that identify a noun's definite or indefinite reference, and the new or given status. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAnArticle.htm 02.05.07)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Determiner
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NonfiniteVerbPhrase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TüBa-D/Z
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#VerbPhrase
_:64
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#unionOf	_:111
_:193
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Quantifier
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:204
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SecondPersonPronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Pronoun with Person="Second". According to Mish et al. (1990:878), this pertains to PersonalPronoun only (and ReflexivePronoun as German "dich"), so SecondPersonPronoun is modelled as a PersReflPronoun here.
	TODO: Person as property
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Second person deixis means deictic reference to a person or persons identified as addressee. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsSecondPersonDeixis.htm 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PersReflPronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RelativeTense
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	relative tense
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#relativeTense
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Relative tense is a tense that refers to a time in relation to a contextually determined temporal reference point, regardless of the latter’s temporal relation to the moment of utterance. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#relativeTense with reference to http://www.sil.org/linguistics/glossaryoflinguisticterms/whatisrelativetense.htm)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#TenseFeature
_:190
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Pronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
_:66
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	_:158
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#NumberFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TODO: extend with TDS numberProperty and GOLD NumberValue
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:205
	_:39
_:206
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#someValuesFrom	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Emphatic
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasEmphasis
_:107
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasPerson
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IndefinitePronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Pronoun with Pron.-Type="Indefinite".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An indefinite pronoun is a pronoun that belongs to a class whose members indicate indefinite reference. Examples in English are "anybody", "one", "somebody". (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAnIndefinitePronoun.htm 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Pronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#StillPresent
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/StillPresent
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	StillPresentTense is similar to PresentTense but carries the presupposition that an event or state held before the moment of utterance. In positive declarative clauses, still present tense asserts that the event or state holds at the moment of utterance (Comrie 1985: 54; named changed from 'StillTense'). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/StillPresent)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Past
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MoodFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Mood feature pertains to grammaticalized moods (as expressed in verbal inflection), Modality refers to the underlying concept that can also be manifested by other grammatical or orthographic markers. Every Mood concept however, entails the corresponding Modality, hence modelled as subsmption between these.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:92
	_:136
_:207
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PossessiveDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adjunction
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	PTB Bracketing Guidelines, Santorini (1991)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The term \adjunction structure" refers to structures which would be represented by tree diagrams of the general form in (@9). The de ning characteristic of adjunction structures is that a node X dominates another instance of X. (Santorini 1991)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SyntacticConstruction
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ElementWithoutClitic
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#ElementWithoutClitic"
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Expression representing a lexeme without any clitics (i.e. because of the absence of cliticization or because the clitic is represented separately) (Chiarcos)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Cliticization
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InterrogativeQuantifier
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:208
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#InterrogativeQuantifier
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In the Czech and Slovak MTE v4 pecs, Numeral/Class="interrogative" are items meaning `how many/much', etc. Strictly speaking, they are pronumerals (pro-quantifiers), but traditional descriptions don't recognise such a category, so they are described variously as pronouns or as numerals (because their syntactic distribution is that of numerals, or very close)." (Ivan A Derzhanski, email 2010/06/11, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#InterrogativeQuantifier)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ProQuantifier
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Gerund
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES NonFiniteVerb with VerbForm="Gerund"; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2243 (gerundive)
	cf. ILPOSTS NominalParticiple, for Indian languages, there in contrast with AdjectivalParticiple, AdverbialParticiple and ConditionalParticiple, but no definition provided. (http://purl.org/olia/ilposts.owl#NominalParticiple)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	property for a non-finite form of a verb other than the infinitive. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2243) A gerund is a kind of verbal noun that exists in some languages. In today's English, gerunds are nouns built from a verb with an '-ing' suffix. They can be used as the subject of a sentence, an object, or an object of preposition. They can also be used to complement a subject. Often, gerunds exist side-by-side with nouns that come from the same root but the gerund and the common noun have different shades of meaning. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerund, http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/English:Gerund 19.09.06) The term _gerund_ is ambiguous: with respect to Latin, in whose grammatical tradition it originates, it refers to a deverbal noun, and is needed in this function for Polish as well; in descriptions of some other languages, however, it has been used for an adverbial participle. The two meanings have nothing in common, except that the English _ing_-form can translate both. (Ivan A Derzhanski, email 2010/06/09) Here, it is assumed that Gerund refers only to deverbal nouns, cf. NominalNonfiniteVerb in the IIIT tagset (http://purl.org/olia/iiit.owl#NominalNonFiniteVerb)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NonFiniteVerb
_:204
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	_:209
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
_:59
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Numeral
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:210
_:208
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:140
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adposition
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES top-level category Adposition (AP).
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An adposition is a cover term for prepositions, postpositions and circumpositions. It expresses a grammatical and semantic relation to another unit within a clause. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAnAdposition.htm, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adposition 19.09.06) The majority of cases of adpositions we have to consider in European languages are prepositions. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node17.html#SECTION00062200000000000000 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MorphosyntacticCategory
_:139
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#someValuesFrom	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Emphatic
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasEmphasis
_:211
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasModality
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PossessiveDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Determiner with DetType="Possessive".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A possessive determiner is a part of speech that modifies a noun by attributing ownership to someone or something. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Possessive_adjective 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PossessivePronoun
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AttributivePronoun
_:212
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#someValuesFrom	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TimeRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSemanticRole
_:209
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#someValuesFrom	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PluralQuantifier
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasNumeralAgreementClass
_:191
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Determiner
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:213
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AdnominalConstituent
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	adnominal modifier
	nominal modifier
	adnominal constituent
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#nominalModifier
	TODO: rename to AdnominalModifier
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Adnominal wird jedes Element in einer Konstruktion bezeichnet, das der Modifizierung eines Nomens dient, d.h. alle Formen von Attributen wie Adjektive, Genitivattribute, PrÃ¤positionalattribute, RelativsÃ¤tze. Zum Beispiel, das schÃ¶ne Haus; das Haus des Nachbars; das Haus am See; das Haus, das ich mir schon immer gewÃ¼nscht habe. (http://www.uni-trier.de/uni/fb2/ldv/ldv_wiki/index.php/Adnominal)
	Each element in a construction is called adnominal that modifies a nominal, such as, all types of attributives, such as adjectives, possessives, prepositional attributes and relative clauses, such as the beautiful house; the neighbour’s house, the house at the sea, the house, that I want. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#nominalModifier)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Modifier
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#UndergoerMacroRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#undergoerRole
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The least agentive argument of the current clause (van Valin and Lapolla 1997), the designated object (from a semantic perspective).
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SemanticRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CountabilityFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:214
_:215
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#someValuesFrom	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DualQuantifier
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasNumeralAgreementClass
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#EmphasisFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	in EAGLES and MULTEXT-East restricted to pronouns, in ILPOSTS applicable to many different WordClasses, hence modelled as an independent feature, cf. http://purl.org/olia/ilposts.owl#Emphasis
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:43
_:174
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PronounOrDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:216
_:41
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasVoice
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Numeral
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	numératif
	numeral
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES top-level category Numeral (NU). Modelled as subclass of Quantifier (a concept that is absent in EAGLES) in accordance with GOLD. DCR subclassification (numberBoth, numeralRoman) ignored
	Subclassification combines syntactic (Ordinal/CardinalNumeral) and morphological (Fraction, ApproximateNumeral) criteria. To be resolved. In the MULTEXT-East ontology, the latter aspect is represented as http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#MorphologicalFormOfNumeral
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A numeral is a word, functioning most typically as an adjective or pronoun, that expresses a number, and relation to the number, such as one of the following: Quantity, Sequence, Frequency, Fraction. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsANumeral.htm 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Quantifier
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasDefiniteness
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#DefinitenessFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
_:42
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasVoice
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasDegree
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#DegreeFeature
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#domain	_:217
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CoordinatingConjunction
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Conjunction with Type="Coordinating". EAGLES' optional CoordType attribute subclassifies coordinating conjunctions, with respect to positional characteristics (repetition/pairing of expressions forming complex conjunctions). (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node18.html#oav1av 17.11.06) CoordType was originally implemented as MorphosyntacticFeature, the new modelling follows the MULTEXT-East ontology (http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#CoordinatingConjunction_PositionalType)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Coordinating conjunctions, also called coordinators, are conjunctions that join two items of equal syntactic importance. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_conjunction 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Conjunction
_:218
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#QuestionWord
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
_:219
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:194
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Possible
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1865
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Value that denotes a linguistic situation considered as being correct in the given language
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#UsageAndFrequencyFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SingularQuantifier
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:220
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#SingularQuantifier (MTE v4 Numeral/Class="definite1", http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#SingularQuantifier) Numeral/Class="definite", Numeral/Class="definite1", Numeral/Class="definite234" etc. refer to specific patterns of congruency with Slavic numerals that originate from the difference between Old Slavic singular (definite1), dual (definite2, definite234) and plural (definite).
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A singular quantifier is a quantifier or a numeral that specifies a single referent from a set. (Chiarcos) In Czech and Slovak MTE v4 specs, the corresponding category Numeral/Class="definite1" is applied to the numeral "one". (MTE v4)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#NumeralAgreementClass
_:221
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#someValuesFrom	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Present
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasTense
_:32
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:198
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
_:205
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasNumber
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AbsoluteRelativeTense
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	absolute-relative tense
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#absoluteRelativeTense
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Absolute-relative tense is a tense that (i) refers to a time in relation to a temporal reference point that, in turn, is referred to in relation to the moment of utterance (ii) in which the time and the reference point are not identical, and (iii) the reference point and the moment of utterance are not identical. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#absoluteRelativeTense with reference to http://www.sil.org/linguistics/glossaryoflinguisticterms/whatisabsoluterelativetense.htm)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#TenseFeature
_:114
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	_:203
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NounHeadedPhrase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A NounHeadedPhrase takes a nominal as its (semantic) head. Introduced as a generalization over NounPhrase and PrepositionalPhrase for reasons of consistency with dependency parsers like Connexor where this differentiation is not made.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Phrase
_:222
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasCase
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
_:223
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	_:177
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
_:199
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#cardinality	1
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasChild
_:97
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#someValuesFrom	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LocationRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSemanticRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SecondaryPunctuation
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	secondary punctuation
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf punctuation (dcif:isA)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2076
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Punctuation that is not very important with regards to sentence splitting in a text. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2076)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Punctuation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PrepositionalObject
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in conformance with SFB632 annotation guidelines (Dipper et al. 2007, §4.3.4)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Prepositional object
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SyntacticObject
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#First
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	first person
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1288
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES, http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/First
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	First person deixis is deictic reference that refers to the speaker, or both the speaker and referents grouped with the speaker (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1288) cf. gold:First: Refers to the speaker and one or more nonparticipants, but not hearer(s). Contrasts with FirstPersonInclusive (Crystal 1997: 285). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/First)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#PersonFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ConditionalRealisModality
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	ILPOSTS (Indian languages), http://purl.org/olia/ilposts.owl#Real is restricted to conditional participles, hence probably a subtype of ConditionalMood
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Conditional Mood (modality) with Realis meaning (ILPOSTS)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ConditionalModality
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Affix
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	affix
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1234
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Letter or group of letters which are added to a word to make a new word. (Sue Ellen Wright; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1234)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Morpheme
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FixedExpression
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#PartOfFixedExpression
	Corresponds to MTE Burkinostka (Adverb/Clitic="burkinostka"; Polish) "Burkinostka was a local joke :). IsPartOfFixedExpression, to be more precise. Or somehow shorter." (Natalia Kotsyba, email 2010/06/21, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#PartOfFixedExpression)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Some forms can only be used in a fixed context, e.g., polsku in po polsku. They are classified as special kinds of adjectives in the IPIC. In the MTE version this information is preserved in the status of a "burkinostka". This term is devised by Magdalena Derwojedowa and refers to dependent words like Burkina which only make sense and can be morphosyntactically identified in a fixed combination (Burkina Faso).
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Collocation
_:40
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#unionOf	_:192
_:210
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Residual
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RelativeDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Determiner with Wh-Type="Relative".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The relative determiner describes a attributive relative pronoun. In German "wessen" in "Ich weiss nicht, wessen Auto das ist." or the English "whose" in "The man whose daughter became ill.". The relative determiner needs a noun to complete a NP (Nominal Phrase). (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/pub/eagles/lexicons/elm_en.ps.gz, p.28, 07.05.07)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#WHDeterminer
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SeparabilityFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:224
	_:131
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PresentParticiple
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:219
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	introduced as a shorthand for Participle and hasTense some Present
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Participle
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TimeRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in conformance with Stanford Parser Dependency Label TIME and SFB632 annotation guidelines (Dipper et al. 2007)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Semantic role corresponding to the label "TIME" used by the Stanford Dependency Parser. Time covers a point or an interval of time at which the action takes place. (Dipper et al. 2007, §5.3.9) -TMP (temporal) — marks temporal or aspectual adverbials that answer the questions when, how often, or how long. It has some uses that are not strictly adverbial, such as with dates that modify other NPs (see section 11 [Modification of NP]). (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SemanticRole
_:102
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Raising
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:225
_:213
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	_:206
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
_:60
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasReduplicationType
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SentenceTypeFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
_:133
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Noun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:68
_:226
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	_:201
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ActorMacroRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#actorRole
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The most agentive semantic role of the current clause (van Valin and Lapolla 1997), designated subject (from a semantic point of view)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SemanticRole
_:172
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasInflectionType
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
_:224
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSeparability
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#UsageAndFrequencyFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
_:138
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SyntacticArgument
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
_:187
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	_:227
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#VerbalParticle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#VerbalParticle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A verbal particle modifies the verb and carries information on the verb form (e.g., finiteness, tense and aspect). (Dimitrova et al. 2009, Dan Tufis, email 2010/06/09). In the Bulgarian MTE specs, Particle/Type=verbal(v) is used to form different type of verbal syntactical relationships, e.g. to create future tense (ще говориш), or particles like се, да. (Dimitrova et al. 2009) The Romanian MTE v4 specs provide a more fine-grained subclassification of (verbal) particles (MTE v4, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#VerbalParticle)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Particle
_:72
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:143
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
_:228
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adposition
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
_:162
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasEvaluativeFeature
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
_:137
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSemanticRole
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
_:227
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#someValuesFrom	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InstrumentRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSemanticRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#VerbPhrase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	This category is slightly more difficult to define, since there is disagreement over the extent of the verb phrase. In particular, should the verb phrase include only the words that are verbs, or should it also include the complements of the verb? In the examples given in this document, and in the sample texts in the appendices, we have chosen to include the complements, but it must be noted that this is an open issue, and we are in no way implying that this analysis is preferable to the alternative. The choice to be made at this level, i.e. the inclusion or exclusion of verbal complements in the Verb Phrase, is shown by the examples in 27 and 28, 27 showing the inclusion of the complement of the verb in the verb phrase and 28 excluding the complement: (27) He [VP took up [NP a clothes brush NP] VP] (28) He [VP took up VP] [NP a clothes brush NP] An advantage in the type of analysis shown in 27 is that the relative levels of the constituents can be shown to a greater extent -- i.e. complements of the verb are included in the verb phrase, while adjuncts and peripheral adverbials are left at sentence level. However, in a case where an adjunct occurs before the complement of the verb, the approaches used in 27 and 28 would cause problems, since either both the adjunct and the complement would be included as daughters of the verb phrase, or both would be daughters of the sentence, rather than keeping the complement as a daughter of the verb phrase and the adjunct as a sister of the verb phrase. These problems may be solved by an additional notation, but at some level, arbitrariness is inevitable. Regardless of the choice made over the extent of the Verb Phrase, there arises a problem of discontinuous Verb Phrases. A complex verbal construction may be discontinuous, e.g. the auxiliary and the main verb are separated in inverted constructions in English, or the main verb is positioned at the end of the sentence in German and Dutch. Such discontinuity can be avoided by having different labels and constituents for the auxiliary verb and the main verb, resulting in an analysis as shown in the Dutch example 29 below: (29) [NP Ze NP] [AUX zullen AUX] [ADVP er ADVP] [VP [NP de VN-agenda [PP voor [NP het komende jaar NP] PP] NP] behandelen VP]. and in the English interrogative inverted example 30, using the so-called `dummy auxiliary' do: (30) [AUX Do AUX] [NP they NP] [VP confide [PP in you PP] VP]? As with Noun Phrases, Verb Phrases can be identified by a constituency test. In strong constituency languages like English, the whole VP can be moved, but not part of it: compare 31 and 32: (31) Give in to blackmail, I never will (32) *Give in, I never will to blackmail However, there are languages in which constituent tests do not work. These will typically be languages with flexible word order, such as Finnish. 33 is an example of a discontinuous VP (Vilkuna 1989: 26): (33) Maailmaa nähnyt hän on. world-Part seen he is `He IS a widely-travelled person.' For Finnish, then, evidence for a VP is less convincing than it is for English, and a dependency approach seems the more natural choice. (Covington (1990) provides a parsing strategy for variable word order languages and Covington (1991) for parsing discontinuous constituents, both using a dependency syntax approach.) In Italian also, constituency tests cannot be applied. This can be shown through the distribution of VP-adverbs (e.g. completamente `completely', intenzionalmente `intentionally', attentamente `carefully') and S-adverbs (e.g. probabilmente `probably', certamente `certainly'). In English, these different classes of adverbs have a different distribution within the sentence. In contrast, in Italian, the distinct adverb classes cannot be distinguished on the basis of their distribution in the sentence. S-adverbs and VP-adverbs can occur in the same positions within the sentence, as illustrated in examples 34 to 37: (34) Attentamente/certamente, il bambino ascoltó la storia `Carefully/certainly, the child listened to the story' (35) Il bambino attentamente/certamente ascoltó la storia `The child carefully/certainly listened to the story' (36) Il bambino ascoltó attentamente/certamente la storia `The child listened carefully/certainly to the story' (37) Il bambino ascoltó la storia attentamente/certamente `The child listened to the story carefully/certainly' Thus, in Italian as well as other languages, neither the position nor the syntactic context can help to decide whether an adverb is an S-adverb or a VP-adverb; this can only be stated by considering its semantic content and the way it relates to the content of the predicate or the sentence. This situation has consequences for the success of standard VP-tests. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/segsasg1/node33.html)
	VerbPhrase is the class of phrases that have verbs as heads. They can play the role of predicate in a main clause. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/VerbPhrase)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Phrase
_:229
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adverb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:223
_:141
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#QuestionWord
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasChild
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In hierarchical relations, the parent is modelled as source, the child as target.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasTarget
_:81
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#WHDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:218
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#NumeralAgreementClass
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:150
_:9
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#unionOf	_:53
_:16
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:230
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
_:176
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSpecificity
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PassiveVoice
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3839
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#passiveVoice
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	When the subject is the patient, target or undergoer of the action, it is said to be in the passive voice. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_voice 17.11.06) When the subject is the agent or actor of the verb, the verb is said to be in the active voice. When the subject is the patient, target or undergoer of the action, it is said to be in the passive voice. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#passiveVoice) Passive is often not clearly distinguished from Inverse: According to Givón (1988), Inverse is characterized by obligatory realization of the suppressed agent, whereas the realization of the agent in a passive construction is optional (or impossible). This restrictive definition of passive does, however, conflict with the use of the term "passive" for European languages. Then, English and German "Passive" would be Inverses. Therefore, Inverse is a subconcept of Passive here. Givón's original Passive is NonInversePassive.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#VoiceFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NonFiniteEmbeddedConstruction
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An embedded construction which contains a non-finite verb form (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#non-finiteEmbeddedConstruction with reference to Dik 1997)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Clause
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PossessivePronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TODO: Check regrouping possibilities, as it is covered by the GOLD definition of PersonalPronoun (i.e., person marking, although no person congruency). PossessivePronoun isn't disjoint with IndefinitePronoun (German: "jemandes" nach jemandes Pfeife tanzen), DemonstrativePronoun (German:"dessen" Zähne alle exakt gleich waren), WHPronoun (German: "wessen" Bedürfnissen soll sie genügen), ReflexivePronoun (Old English "sin" his/her/its).
	EAGLES Pronoun with Pron.-Type="Possessive".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A possessive pronoun is a pronoun that expresses relationships like ownership, such as kinship, and other forms of association. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAPossessivePronoun.htm 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Pronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Phrase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Phrase
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Phrase is the class of syntactic constructions that consist of one or more syntactic words, but lack the subject-predicate organization of a clause. Phrases get their grammatical characteristics according to what word occupies the head position; thus, all phrases have heads [Crystal 1980, 232-233; Pei and Gaynor 1954, 169; Pike and Pike 1982, 453]. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Phrase)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#Constituent
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Third
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES, http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Third
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Third person is deictic reference to a referent(s) not identified as the speaker or addressee. For example in English "he", "she", "they" or the third person singular verb suffix -s, e.g. in "He sometimes flies." (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsThirdPersonDeixis.htm 20.11.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#PersonFeature
_:231
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	_:134
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
_:79
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Morpheme
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:196
_:217
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#unionOf	_:166
_:232
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasTense
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
_:90
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Lexeme
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:233
_:234
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#WHPronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:108
_:17
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#someValuesFrom	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Nonspecific
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSpecificity
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Pronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES PronounOrDeterminer with Category="Pronoun".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A pronoun is a pro-form which functions like a noun and substitutes for a noun or a noun-phrase. A language may have several classes of pronouns. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAPronoun.htm 19.09.06) A pronominal is a phrase that functions as a pronoun (www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAPronominal.htm; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1369)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PronounOrDeterminer
_:38
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Verb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:231
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CauseRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in conformance with the SFB632 Annotation Guidelines (Dipper et al. 2007)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Cause indicates the reason why something happens and is often expressed by a PP (because of, with, through etc.). Sometimes this role is close to the role of Instrument. The criterion for the choice of tag CAUSE is if the expression can be paraphrased through a clausal subordinate clause. (Dipper et al. 2007, 5.3.10)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SemanticRole
_:87
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PossessivePronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:153
_:91
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:83
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#LexicalRelation
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
_:116
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasPolarity
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MorphologicalProcess
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ConditionalModality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	conditional
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf verbFormMood (dcif:conceptualDomain)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1258
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In Inuktitut, conditionality is expressed by verbal inflection. Conditional mood signifies conditional relationships in a sentence. (Nowak 1996, p.39) A conditional relation is a logical relation in which the illocutionary act employing one of a pair of propositions is expressed or implied to be true or in force if the other proposition is true. (www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAConditionalRelation.htm; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1258) Elke Nowak (1996), Transforming the images: Ergativity and transitivity in Inuktitut (Eskimo). Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ModalityFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSemanticRole
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SemanticRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasMood
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MoodFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasModality
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubjunctiveModality
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Subjunctive, http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#subjunctiveModality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The subjunctive is the mood that is minimally marked as opposed to the indicative and that marks a clause as not directly representing an assertion of the speaker. (http://www.uni-erfurt.de/sprachwissenschaft/proxy.php?port=8080&file=lido/servlet/Lido_Servlet Subjunktiv 18.06.07)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ModalityFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Morpheme
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	morpheme
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1330
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A morpheme is the smallest meaningful unit in the grammar of a language. (www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAMorpheme.htm; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1330)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MorphologicalCategory
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Unique
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES top-level category Unique (U). "The unique value (U) is applied to categories with a unique or very small membership, such as negative particle, which are ‘unassigned’ to any of the standard part-of-speech categories. The value unique cannot always be strictly applied, since (for example) Greek has three negative particles ... No subcategories are recommended, although it is expected that tagsets for individual languages will need to identify such one-member word-classes as Negative particle, Existential particle, Infinitive marker, etc" (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node16.html) According to the EAGLES definition and examples, this seems to be closely related to "particle". Particles are uninflected function words, in a broader sense, everything which is not inflected is a particle, i.e. including interjections, in GOLD, uninflected items such as adpositions, conjunctions and interjections are excluded: "A particle is a partOfSpeech whose members do not belong to one of the main classes of words, is invariable, and typically has grammatical or pragmatic meaning." The EAGLES definition emphasizes the invariability of particles.
	TODO: rename to Particle
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Unique approximates the linguistic concept "Particle". It covers categories with unique or very small membership, such as negative particle, which are `unassigned' to any of the standard part-of-speech categories. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node16.html#mp 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MorphosyntacticCategory
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Modifier
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SyntacticAdjunct
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Modifier
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in conformance with TIGER, equivalent to SyntacticAdjunct, cf. definition by Dipper et al. (2007) there
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	added in conformance with TIGER
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SyntacticRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Token
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	token
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1403
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Character string surrounded by separators. (Gil Francopoulo; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1403)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#OrthographicEntity
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#Constituent
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2008/SyntacticConstruction
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Constituents correspond to a GOLD SyntacticConstruction: SyntacticConstruction is the class of grammar units that have syntactic structure, i.e., consisting of more than one syntactic word or construction in a syntactic configuration. [Crystal 1980, 85-86]. (http://www.linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2008) Corresponds to units of annotation in the EAGLES recommendations for syntactic annotation (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/segsasg1/node29.html#SECTION00052000000000000000)
_:230
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ReflexiveDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:207
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Intensifier
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from Ancorra, http://purl.org/olia/ancorra.owl#Intensifier
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	For Hindi, words like 'bahuta', 'kama', etc. when intensifying adjectives or adverbs will be annotated as INTF. Example, h37. hEdarAbAda meM aMgUra bahuta_INTF acche milate hEM 'HyderabAd' 'in' 'grapes' 'very' 'good' 'available' 'are' “Very good grapes are available in Hyderabad” (Bharati et al. 2006) Akshar Bharati, Dipti Misra Sharma, Lakshmi Bai, Rajeev Sangal (2006), AnnCorra : Annotating Corpora. Guidelines For POS And Chunk Annotation For Indian Languages, Tech. Rep., L anguage Technologies Research Centre IIIT, Hyderabad, version of 15-12-2006, http://ltrc.iiit.ac.in/tr031/posguidelines.pdf
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Unique
_:26
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:121
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
_:54
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PassiveVoice
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InverseVoice
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/InverseVoice
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Signals when actions proceed from ontologically less salient to more salient participants (Klaiman 1991:32) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/InverseVoice)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PassiveVoice
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ReflexiveDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	reflexive adjective
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf determiner (dcif:isA)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1377
	TOCHECK: Are there non-possessive reflexive determiners ?
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Determiner that refers to the same entity. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1377)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Determiner
_:4
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:164
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#VerbalNoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Missing in EAGLES, added as subclass of Verb and Noun in accordance with the SFB632 annotation guidelines: VN verbal noun (§4.3.12.2): Some of the Chadic languages have morphologically opaque verbal noun stems in the progresive aspect, i.e. it is not obvious from the morphology that we deal with a deverbal noun, instead of a verb proper. In such cases, use the tag VN.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A verbal noun is a noun formed directly as an inflexion of a verb or a verb stem, sharing at least in part its constructions. This term is applied especially to gerunds, and sometimes also to infinitives and supines. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verbal_noun 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CommonNoun
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NonFiniteVerb
_:185
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#someValuesFrom	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SingularQuantifier
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasNumeralAgreementClass
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasNumber
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#NumberFeature
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#domain	_:171
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#TenseFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Subclassification in absolute, relaive and absolute-relative adopted from TDS. Habitual is modelled here as Aspect, in accordance with GOLD, replaced here by NotTemporallyAnchored. Skipped TDS non-presentTense (= complement of Present), http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/NonFuture, http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/NonPast, redefined Future and Past as superconcepts to cover different future and past tenses
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:232
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#WHTypeAdverbs
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	See remarks on WHPronoun, this is actually a language-specific trait and should probably be removed.
	TODO: rename to WHTypeAdverb
	EAGLES Adverb with Polarity="Wh-type".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Adverb that serves to express interrogativity, exclamation or that serves to link a subordinate clause to the matrix clause. (Ch. Chiarcos)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adverb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DualQuantifier
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:48
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#DualQuantifier
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Quantifiers that enforce dual agreement (i.e., as with the numeral "2"). Some feminine and neuter body parts in Czech have preserved dual forms, and if the noun is dual, so are its attributes (adjectives, pronouns). So the agreement of the numeral 2 differs formally from 3-4 (Ivan A. Derzhanski, email 2010/06/16, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#DualQuantifier) Numeral/Class="definite", Numeral/Class="definite1", Numeral/Class="definite234" etc. refer to specific patterns of congruency with Slavic numerals that originate from the difference between Old Slavic singular (definite1), dual (definite2, definite234) and plural (definite). (http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#DualQuantifier)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#NumeralAgreementClass
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#PhonologicalProcess
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasCase
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#domain	_:109
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DebitiveModality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3835
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Mood to express necessity or requirement
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ModalityFeature
_:73
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasGender
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
_:71
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Quantifier
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:226
_:128
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#QuestionWord
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ReflexivityFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TODO: integrate with VoiceFeature (as in the TDS Ontology) implementation
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:120
	_:235
	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#VoiceFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSpecificity
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SpecificityFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SyntacticObject
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#syntacticObject
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In linguistics, the object of a transitive verb is one of its core arguments, which generally represents the target of the verb's action or the undergoer of its effects. In more general terms, an object is a patient. Verbs with no object (as in the sentence "I run") are called intransitive verbs. Those which do take objects are called transitive verbs. Transitive verbs which take only one object are known as monotransitive. Ditransitive verbs have two objects, a patient and a recipient. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object_%28grammar%29). (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#syntacticObject) An object, traditionally defined, is either a direct object or an indirect object. An object, in some usages, is any grammatical relation other than subject (Crystal 1985: 211; Hartmann and Stork 1972: 155-156; Mish et al. 1990: 814, Comrie 1989: 66). (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/object)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SyntacticArgument
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LocationRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#locationRole, cf. the TIGER edge label "Locative"
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Semantic role for the final location of action or a time of the action. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1326) Adverbials that indicate place/setting of the event. (PP-LOC on (NP the moon)) May also indicate metaphorical location: (PP-LOC amongst (NP yourselves)) (Bies et al. 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SemanticRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasMovementFeature
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MovementFeature
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#domain	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#UnitOfAnnotation
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ReferentTypeFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
_:84
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Pronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
_:216
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adjective
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:236
_:237
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasValency
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasParent
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In hierarchical relations, the parent is modelled as source, the child as target.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasSource
_:165
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	_:146
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Past
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES, http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#pastTense
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The past tense is a verb tense expressing action, activity, state or being in the past. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Past_tense 17.11.06) The past tense refers to a tense category which places an event in the past. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#pastTense)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AbsoluteTense
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Qualifier
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Qualifier
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1373
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Also called MODIFIER : A word or phrase that qualifies the sense of another word; for example, the noun alarm is a modifier of clock in "alarm clock" and the phrase every day is an adverbial modifier of walks in "he walks every day" (www.wordreference.com/English/definition.asp?en=modifier; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1373)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Modifier
_:220
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:182
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#NullElement
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
_:238
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Article
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
_:161
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasProximity
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSyntacticValency
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ValencyFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	SUSANNE (Sampson 1995)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In annotation schemes for morphosyntax, "valency" normally means syntactic valency, i.e., the number of syntactic arguments a verb/clause takes.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PronounOrDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	pronom / determinatif
	pronoun or determiner
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES top-level category PronounOrDeterminer (PD). The existence of this class is, however, controversial. In EAGLES, it has been introduced for reasons of lexical ambiguity in European languages thus it could be described by the joint of Pronoun and Determiner rather than as an independent class. Indeed, at least one fundamental difference is blurred here: Determiners are purely modifiers whereas pronouns contribute independent meaning. This could be adopted here as a criterion for higher-level organization of the OLiA Reference Model. The original EAGLES definition is not very specific about the difference between Pronouns and Determiners. Here, we assume two definitions: * semantic definition of pronouns: Pronouns are bound variables. They are referential. * syntactic definition of determiners: Determiners turn nominal expressions (of type ) into noun phrases (of type ). Note that these definitions are not exclusive (which is why annotation schemes differ in this aspect). Attributive possessive pronouns ('my book', 'their article') are semantically pronouns (they have an independent reference), but syntactically determiners. For the sub-classes, no exclusivity is required as Olia allows a hybrid ("both") category by multiple inheritance.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The parts of speech Pronoun, Determiner and Article heavily overlap in their formal and functional characteristics, and different analyses for different languages entail separating them out in different ways. In Eagles, Pronouns and Determiners are placed in one `super-category'. For some descriptions it may be thought best to treat them as totally different parts of speech. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node17.html#recp 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MorphosyntacticCategory
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ValencyFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	ValencyFeature cannot be reflexive, because hasSyntacticValency is distinguished from hasSemanticValency
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:237
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PronominalAdverb
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	pronominal adverb
	adverbial pronoun
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3011 (adverbialPronoun)
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Adverb with Adverb-Type="Pronominal". Against the EAGLES definition given below, pronominal adverbs can but don't have to be used for pronominal references, thus this special and diachronically important case is better described by the join of this with personal pronoun.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Pronominal adverbs substitute for a preposition (which is incorporated into them) and an NP, cf. English therefore lit. "for this (reason, ...)", German deswegen lit. "because of this (reason, ...)". (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/elm_de/node235.html 21.09.06, examples Ch. Chiarcos)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adverb
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ObligativeModality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3356
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	ObligativeModality indicates that an agent is required to perform the action expressed by the predicate [Bybee, Perkins and Pagliuca 1994: 177; Palmer 2001: 71].
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ModalityFeature
_:175
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSpecificity
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IndefiniteQuantifier
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#IndefiniteQuantifier
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In the Czech and Slovak MTE v4 specs, Numeral/Class="indefinite" are items meaning `several/some', etc. Strictly speaking, they are pronumerals (pro-quantifiers), but traditional descriptions don't recognise such a category, so they are described variously as pronouns or as numerals (because their syntactic distribution is that of numerals, or very close)." (Ivan A Derzhanski, email 2010/06/11, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#IndefiniteQuantifier)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ProQuantifier
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#CausalModality
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Nowak (1996)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In Inuktitut, causality is expressed by verbal inflection. Causal mood signifies causal relationships in a sentence. (Nowak 1996, p.39) Elke Nowak (1996), Transforming the images: Ergativity and transitivity in Inuktitut (Eskimo). Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ModalityFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adjective
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	adjective
	adjectif
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES top-level category Adjective (AJ).
	the subclassification of Adjective currently conflates syntactic (PredicativeAdjective), morphological (ParticipleAdjective) and semantic (QualifierAdjective, RelativeAdjective) criteria. to be resolved
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An Adjective is a noun-modifying expression that specifies the properties or attributes of the nominal referent. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAnAdjective.htm 18.9.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MorphosyntacticCategory
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TenseMarkingParticle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	adopted from Dzongkha tagset (Chungku et al. 2010, http://purl.org/olia/dzongkha.owl#TenseMarker)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Dzongkha has also a tense marker, which is not complicated like in other languages. It has got only six tense markers and can be used in a very simple and effective way. They are: ('Ni'+'Wong') for future, ('D'o'+'D'ä') for present and ('Ci'+'Yi') for past tense. ང་ ནངས་པ་ འ ་ ། Nga naba jo-ni[past tense] I tomorrow go-will-[past] 'I am going tomorrow' (http://panl10n.net/english/Outputs%20Phase%202/CCs/Bhutan/Papers/2007/0701/PartOfSpeech.pdf)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#VerbalParticle
http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasSource
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
_:21
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#unionOf	_:239
_:195
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	_:221
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#String
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2182
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Introduced as a generalization over numeralRoman which is orthographically defined but not a single character
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Character string to be interpreted in context
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#OrthographicEntity
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasVoice
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#VoiceFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
_:156
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasGender
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InterrogativeDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass	_:80
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Determiner with WhType="Interrogative"
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A interrogative is a function word used to introduce an interrogative clause. E.g. "which", "what", "whose" (interrogative possessive determiner) are interrogative determiner in English. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interrogative_word 02.05.07)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#WHDeterminer
_:239
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MorphologicalParticle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:228
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Emphatic
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in accordance with ILPOSTS, cf. http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#EmphaticDeterminer, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#EmphaticPronoun, http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1941 (emphatic pronoun)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Pronoun marked to show its importance. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1941) In Romanian, the so-called emphatic determiner may accompany both a noun and a personal pronoun: fata *însăşi* (the girl *herself*), also ea *însăşi* (she *herself*). (http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#EmphaticDeterminer) Emphasis can not only be expressed on nouns and pronouns, but also at verbs, adverbs, adpositions, etc., cf. http://purl.org/olia/ilposts.owl#Emphasis
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#EmphasisFeature
_:2
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:65
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#CaseFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Note that also Indian case markers were included here (ILPOSTS). These are described differently, either as postpositions or as grammatical cases.
	Skipped EAGLES case feature values Uninflected (uninformative), and NonGenitive (= complement of Genitive). As for TDS case feature values, only "grammaticalCase" has been adopted. As for GOLD case feature values, everything has been adopted, although it seems that some of these cases are actually semantic (theta) roles, i.e., "case" in the sense of Fillmore (1966), e.g., BenefactiveCase.
	TODO: rename all subconcepts to ...Case
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:222
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasProximity
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ProximityFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
_:49
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Quantifier
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:240
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Punctuation
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES top-level category Punctuation (PU). For subconcepts, Wilson and Leech (1996) propose two alternative classifications: Here, we implement the more interesting, i.e. position (the alternative is just enumeration of possible signs)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Punctuation marks (PU) are treated here as a part of morphosyntactic annotation, as it is very common for punctuation marks to be tagged and to be treated as equivalent to words for the purposes of automatic tag assignment. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node16.html#mp 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MorphosyntacticCategory
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Future
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES, http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#futureTense, http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Future
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The future tense refers to events that have yet to happen. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Future 17.11.06) The future tense refers to a tense category which places an event in the future. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#futureTense) FutureTense locates the situation in question later than the present moment (time of speaking.) (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/Future)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AbsoluteTense
_:45
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Verb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:241
_:214
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasCountability
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
_:170
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasSyntacticFunction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
_:122
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	_:212
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Raising
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.lexinfo.net/ontology/2.0/lexinfo#RaisableArgument
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Control indicates how a an argument from a main clause will be utilized in a subclause. Control includes both control structures and raising structures of verbs/clauses (see Control). As opposed to this, the OLiA Raising class pertains to raisable/raised arguments, cf. http://www.lexinfo.net/ontology/2.0/lexinfo#RaisableArgument
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MovementFeature
_:28
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:229
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
_:240
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	_:215
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasModality
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ModalityFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NounPhrase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	At phrase level, the noun phrase is probably the least problematic of the categories to be dealt with. In general, a noun phrase will a have noun or a pronoun as its head, and included within the noun phrase are the determinative elements, any premodification, and any postmodification. The examples below, 14 to 17 show noun phrases with the head noun/pronoun in bold: (14) [NP He NP] was a tiny man (15) [NP his white shirt cuffs NP] (16) [NP his surprisingly thick and hairy wrists NP] (17) [NP some wholly unanticipated but remotely possible event of absorbing interest NP] However, noun phrases may also occur with adjectival heads, as in 18 and 19: (18) [NP The unemployed NP] have had enough (19) We've beaten [NP the best NP] or with a head which is a cardinal or ordinal number, as in 20 and 21: (20) [NP The ninth NP] is my particular favourite (21) [NP The other seven NP] continued with the trip In `pro-drop' languages, such as Spanish and Italian, pronominal Subjects are usually not expressed. Depending on the chosen type of analysis, this may require another definition of noun phrase, in order to include `empty noun phrases', in which the pronoun is not actually present, but may be inferred from the verb ending. A classic constituency test for Noun Phrases is that only whole NPs can be moved within the same sentence. In English, constituents can be preposed to achieve some effect, as in 23 (from Radford 1988: 70): (22) I can't stand your elder sister (23) Your elder sister I can't stand (though your brother's OK). Examples 24 and 25 show that it is not possible to move only part of the NP: (24) *Your elder I can't stand sister (25) *Elder sister, I can't stand your However, this test should be used with caution. It works well in English, but not always in other languages. For example, in 26 Neue Bücher is moved to the beginning of the sentence while keine is left at the end: (26) Neue Bücher habe ich keine new books have I no `I have not got any new books' (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/segsasg1/node32.html)
	NounPhrase is the class of phrases that have nouns as heads. They can play the role of subject in a main clause. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/NounPhrase)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#NounHeadedPhrase
_:225
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SyntacticSubject
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
_:67
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Quantifier
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:118
_:106
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:179
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InstrumentRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#instrumentRole, cf. TIGER edge label "Instrumental"
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	SemanticRole added in conformance with TIGER
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SemanticRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MannerRole
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in conformance with the SFB632 annotation scheme (Dipper et al. 2007)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Manner applies to constituents that denote how something is carried out. Adverbs may also denote manner, however, they are not annotated at any of the syntactic layers. (Dipper et al. 2007, §5.3.11)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SemanticRole
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ParticipleAdjective
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	participle adjective
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	subClassOf adjective (dcif:isA)
	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1598
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Adjective based on a verb. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1598)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Participle
	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adjective
_:11
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:127
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
_:19
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:55
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#QuotativeModality
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#Quotative, MTE VForm="quotative" (Estonian)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A quotative is grammatical device to mark reported speech in some languages (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quotative), e.g., in Estonian. ‘Reportedly, while he was going (in his boat), he turned over.’ Ta olevat oma paadiga ümber läinud He was_QUOTATIVE his_own boat_WITH over gone. (Estonian translation of an example given under http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAQuotativeEvidential.htm) (Heiki-Jaan.Kaalep, email 2010/06/22)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ModalityFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AbilitativeModality
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Adopted from ILPOSTS (for Indian languages), http://purl.org/olia/ilposts.owl#AbilitativeMood
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	modality expressed by AbilitativeMood: Abilitative is a mood that indicates ability, comparable to the use of "can" in English. (http://zbb.spinnwebe.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=34901)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ModalityFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Nonspecific
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	see olia:NonspecificArticle, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#NonspecificPronoun
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	"By ʻspecificʼ and ʻnon-specificʼ I intend the difference between the two readings of English indefinites like (3): (3) Iʼm looking for a deer. In the specific reading there is a particular deer, say Bambi, that I am looking for. In the non-specific reading I will be happy to find any deer. Von Heusinger (2002) likes the test in English of inserting ʻcertainʼ after the ʻaʼ to fix the specific reading. In either reading of (3) a deer is being introduced as a new discourse referent. This is opposed to ʻdefiniteʼ which requires a previous pragmatic instantiation as in ʻIʼm looking for the deer.ʼ In English both the readings of (3) are indefinite. In Klallam, the specific demonstratives are neither definite nor indefinite." (Montler, Timothy. 2007. Klallam demonstratives. Papers ICSNL XLVII. The 42nd International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Language, pp. 409-425. University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics, Volume 20; on specific vs. nonspecific determiners in Klallam, a Salish language, http://montler.net/papers/KlallamDemons.pdf) A nonspecific pronoun refers to an unidentified or general entity (e.g., "I saw *someone*", "I saw *everyone*"). A nonspecific pronoun is not, therefore, a personal pronoun, but an indefinite one. (Andrews 2003). Andrews, Richard J. (2003), Introduction to Classical Nahuatl. University of Oklahoma Press. Halliday, M.A.K. (1985), An introduction to Functional Grammar, London: Edward Arnold (http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#NonspecificPronoun)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SpecificityFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#TopologicalField
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Telljohann et al. (2009, p.13)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Topological fields are a descriptive formalism to describe regularities of the makro-structure of sentences, for example, in the traditional description of word order inseveral Germanic languages (e.g., German, Dutch, Danish). More recently, similar conceptions of topological fields have been further developed in the context of constructivistic grammar formalisms, e.g., Role and Reference Grammar (van Valin and LaPolla 1997).
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasNumeralAgreementClass
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#NumeralAgreementClass
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#domain	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Quantifier
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf	http://purl.org/olia/system.owl#hasFeature
_:236
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Numeral
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:238
_:189
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#unionOf	_:125
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Determiner
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	determiner
	determinatif
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Note that "Determiner" in OLiA also covers determiner-like elements in languages without grammaticalized determiner category. This is because AttributePronoun is defined as being in the intersection of Determiner and Pronoun. In languages without grammaticalized determiners, attributive pronouns are, howevetr, not characterized as determiners, but rather as adjectives. In order to provide a uniform modeling of attributive pronouns, they are defined here as being the intersection of Determiner and Pronoun. (Chiarcos)
	introduced AttributivePronoun as subclass of Determiner (Article is no AttributivePronoun)
	EAGLES PronounOrDeterminer with category="Determiner"
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A determiner is a noun modifier that expresses the reference of a noun or noun phrase in the context, including quantity, rather than attributes expressed by adjectives. This part of speech is defined in some languages, such as in English, as it is distinct from adjectives grammatically, though most English dictionaries still identify the determiners as adjectives. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Determiner 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PronounOrDeterminer
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#StrengthFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TODO: link with concept hierarchy
	TODO: rename to ReductionFeature
	merged with http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#AdjectiveFormation, http://purl.org/olia/mte/multext-east.owl#ReductionFeature: reduced vs. full inflection
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:36
	_:184
_:149
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#complementOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AttributivePronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#ModalityFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	note that Modality overlaps with SentenceType (cf. InterrogativeModality besides Question, DeclarativeModality vs. DeclarativeSentence, etc.). The main difference between both is the restriction of SentenceType to full sentences as a basis of analysis. Any updates should maintain this relationship.
	Mood feature pertains to grammaticalized moods (as expressed in verbal inflection), Modality refers to the underlying concept that can also be manifested by other grammatical or orthographic markers
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	_:211
	_:93
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SubordinatingConjunction
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Following EAGLES and MULTEXT-East, the subclassification of SubordinatingConjunction reflects constraints on MorphosyntacticFeatures of verbal and nominal arguments of subordinating conjunctions, in these cases verbal inflection (finiteness, negation) and Degree
	EAGLES Conjunction with Type="Subordinating". The language- (German-) specific EAGLES feature "subord-type" was originally modelled as MorphosyntacticFeature, when integrating the MULTEXT-East ontology, it was remodelled within the taxonomy
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Subordinating conjunctions, also called subordinators, are conjunctions that introduce a dependent clause. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_conjunction 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Conjunction
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#FiniteVerb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Verb with Finiteness="Finite".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A finite verb is a verb form that occurs in an independent clause, and is fully inflected according to the inflectional categories marked on verbs in the language. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAFiniteVerb.htm 19.09.06) Property applied to a verb form that can occur on its own in an independent sentence. (Crystal 2003; http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1287)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Verb
_:6
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:151
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
_:241
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	_:129
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AbsoluteTense
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	absolute tense
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#absoluteTense
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	Absolute tense refers to a time in relation to the moment of utterance. (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#absoluteTense with reference to http://www.sil.org/linguistics/glossaryoflinguisticterms/whatisabsolutetense.htm")
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#TenseFeature
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#RegisterFeature
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Verb
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	verb
	verbe
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES top-level category "Verb" (V)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A verb is a part of speech that usually denotes action ("bring", "read"), occurrence ("decompose", "glitter"), or a state of being ("exist", "stand"). Depending on the language, a verb may vary in form according to many factors, possibly including its tense, aspect, mood and voice. It may also agree with the person, gender, and/or number of some of its arguments (subject, object, etc.). (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verb 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MorphosyntacticCategory
_:235
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasReflexivity
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#hasSelf	true
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SentenceFinalPunctuation
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	added in accordance with http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node17.html#recv
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	SentenceFinalPunctuation are . ? !. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node17.html#recv 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#MainPunctuation
_:18
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:242
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
_:233
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	_:85
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
_:56
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#QuestionWord
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DefiniteArticle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	EAGLES Article with Article-Type="Definite".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A definite article is used before singular and plural nouns that refer to a particular member of a group. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_%28grammar%29 18.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Article
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#DiscourseEntity
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
_:86
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PronounOrDeterminer
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:173
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AdjectivePhrase
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/AdjectivePhrase
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	An adjective phrase may consist of an adjective, or a sequence of words in which an adjective is the head of the phrase, as shown in 47 to 50 below. (47) [NP his [ADJP surprisingly thick and hairy ADJP] wrists NP] (48) [NP some [ADJP [ADJP wholly unanticipated ADJP] but [ADJP remotely possible ADJP] ADJP] event NP] (49) [S [NP His speeches NP] [VP are [ADVP always ADVP] [ADJP too long [PP for comfort PP] ADJP] VP] S] (50) [AUX have AUX] [NP you NP] [VP found [NP something [ADJP suitable [PP for [NP your needs NP] PP] ADJP] NP] VP] ? (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/segsasg1/node36.html)
	AdjectivePhrase is the class of phrases that have adjectives as heads. (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/AdjectivePhrase)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Phrase
_:180
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	_:197
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
_:144
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#cardinality	1
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#onProperty	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#hasParent
_:167
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adverb
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
_:14
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#complementOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Adjective
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#SubordTypeFeature
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#deprecated	true
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	reimplemented as concepts
_:242
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ContrastiveParticle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:243
_:243
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#EmphaticParticle
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PersReflPronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	TODO: This class should be renamed to PersonalPronoun, as it corresponds to the definition of PersonalPronoun in GOLD. Subclasses then should be renamed to ReflexivePronoun and NonreflexivePersonalPronoun.
	EAGLES Pronoun with Pron.-Type="Pers/Ref".
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	In Eagles personal and reflexive pronouns are brought together as a single value Pers./Refl. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node17.html#recp 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Pronoun
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Quantifier
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	A category "Quantifier" is missing in EAGLES, but seems to be conflated with IndefiniteDeterminer. Added as top-level concept in accordance with the SFB632 annotation guidelines. Against the original (and meanwhile corrected) modelling in GOLD, Quantifier is not a subconcept of Determiner.
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	A quantifier is a determiner that expresses a referent's definite or indefinite number or amount. A quantifier functions as a modifier of a noun, or pronoun. (http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAQuantifier.htm 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia-top.owl#MorphosyntacticCategory
_:181
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#intersectionOf	_:234
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DirectQuestion
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	Santorini 1991, Bies et al. 1995
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	There are two types of direct questions: yes-no questions and wh-questions. Yes-no questions should be bracketed as SQ. The auxiliary verb or form of do that precedes the subject in a yes-no question is a child of SQ. Note that yes-no questions need not contain a VP node (Santorini 1991)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Question
_:57
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Pronoun
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest	_:148
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#RightParentheticalPunctuation
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2079
	TODO: rename to ClosePunctuation to support scripts running from left to right
	added in accordance with EAGLES suggestions (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node17.html#recv)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	End of a paired punctuation. (http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2079) RightParentheticalPunctuation is a punctuation mark which concludes a constituent whose the opening is marked by a LeftParentheticalPunctuation, e.g. ), ] and Spanish ?. (http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/annotate/node17.html#recv 19.09.06)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ParentheticalPunctuation
http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SyntacticSubject
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo	http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#syntacticSubject
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment	The subject of a sentence is one of the two main parts of a sentence, the other being the predicate. Providing an adequate definition of the notion of a subject is notoriously difficult, and depends on a range of grammatical properties that may vary from language to language. For this reason, many current grammatical theories avoid using the term, except for purely descriptive purposes, or define it in terms of occupying a particular position in the clause. The term subject refers to the grammatical function an expression may have in relation to other expressions in a sentence, and it should be distinguished from parts of speech, which classify expressions independently of their relations to other constituents of a sentence. The subject of a verb is the argument which generally refers to the origin of the action or the undergoer of the state shown by the verb. However, this definition depends on the particular language under consideration. In languages where a passive voice exists, the subject of a passive verb may be the target or result of the action. This is a semantic definition. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subject_(grammar)). (http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/tds/onto/LinguisticOntology.owl#syntacticSubject)
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf	http://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SyntacticArgument