http://purl.org/wf4ever/wfprov |
|
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/description
|
The wfprov ontology shows how to express minimal provenance information about the execution of a workflow described using the wfdesc ontology.
|
|
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#imports
|
http://purl.org/wf4ever/wfdesc |
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
|
|
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionIRI
|
https://raw.github.com/wf4ever/ro/0.1.1/wfprov.owl
|
|
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#seeAlso
|
http://purl.org/wf4ever/ro
|
|
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
|
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology
|
|
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo
|
0.1.1
|
|
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment
|
The wfprov ontology shows how to express minimal provenance information about the execution of a workflow described using the wf ontology.
Here the concern is mainly the provenance which affects the research object, so in particular how some ro:Resource's might have been generated or used by the execution of a wfdesc:Workflow.
The main class here is a wfprov:WorkflowRun which shows how wfprov:Artifact instances (the data) wfprov:wasOutputFrom a wfprov:ProcessRun for generated artifacts, or wfprov:usedInput for consumed artifacts. The WorkflowRun is also a ProcessRun, and so the overall inputs and outputs of thw workflow execution can be described in the same manner.
These provenance details are linked to the corresponding wfdesc descriptions using wfdesc:describedbyProcess, wfdesc:describedByWorkflow and wfdesc:describedByParameter.
This ontology can be further linked to more specific provenance ontologies like OPM-V or W3C PROV-O, but this should be done separately.
|
|
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title
|
The Wfprov Ontology
|